Brain Topography

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 169–176

The effect of pre-stimulus alpha activity on the auditory p300 paradigm: A prospective study

  • Gregory W. Price
Article

Summary

A method is described for carrying out Evoked Response Potential (ERP) testing in which the background EEG is itself treated as an independent variable, and the application of a stimulus made contingent upon this variable. As an illustration of the method, an Auditory Oddball paradigm was implemented, in association with real time processing and testing of the background EEG, and an investigation was carried out into the effect of background alpha activity in 35 normal subjects. In the novel methodology presented here, stimulus presentation was conditional on a “high” level of alpha activity in the pre-stimulus EEG as evaluated by real-time spectral analysis. The dependency of presentation of the stimuli on the state of the pre-stimulus EEG suggests the term “interactive” ERP for the methodology. The resulting ERP was compared with that of a matched recording without pre-stimulus EEG testing. The results show that the parietal P300 peak is reduced by the use of alpha dependent recording. This result indicates that the background EEG activity at the time of application of a stimulus can have an effect on the resulting ERP.

Key words

ERP EEG P300 Alpha rhythm 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amochaev, A., Salamy, A., Alvarez, W., and Peeke, H. Topographic mapping and habituation of event related EEG alpha band desynchronisation. Intern. J. Neuroscience, 1989, 49: 151–155.Google Scholar
  2. Basar, E., Basar-Eroglu, C., Rosen, B. and Schutt, A. A new approach to endogenous Event-Related Potentials in man: Relation between EEG and P300-wave. Intern. J. Neuroscience, 1984, 24 (Suppl. 1): 1–21.Google Scholar
  3. Boiten, F., Sergeant, J. and Geuze, R. Event related desynchronization: Effects of energetic and computational demands. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1992, 82: 302–309.Google Scholar
  4. Brandt, M.E., Jansen, B.H. and Carbonari, J.P. Pre-stimulus EEG patterns and the visual evoked response. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1991, 80: 16–20.Google Scholar
  5. Duncan-Johnson, C.C. and Donchin, E. On quantifying surprise: The variation of event related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology, 1977, 14: 456–467.Google Scholar
  6. Fitzgerald, P.G. and Picton, T.W. Temporal and sequential probability in evoked potential studies. Can. J. Psychol., 1981, 35: 188–200.Google Scholar
  7. Gevins, A.S. and Cutillo, B.A. Signals of cognition. In: F. H. Lopes da Silva (Ed.), Handbook of Electroencephalography: Event related potentials (1st Edition). Elsevier, New York, 1986: 335–382.Google Scholar
  8. Glabus, M.F., Blackwood, D.H.R., Ebmeier, K.P., Souza, V., Walker, M.T., Sharp, C.W., Dunan, J.T., and Muir, W. Methodological considerations in measurement of the P300 component of the auditory oddball ERP in schizophrenia. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1994, 90: 123–134.Google Scholar
  9. Jansen, B.H. and Brandt, M.E. The effect of the phase of prestimulus alpha activity on the averaged visual evoked potential. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1991, 80: 241–250.Google Scholar
  10. Jasiukaitis, P. and Hakerem, G. The effect of pre-stimulus alpha activity on the P300. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1988, 25(Suppl. 2): 157–65.Google Scholar
  11. Jodo, E. and Inoue, K. Effects of practice on Go/No Go task. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1990, 76: 249–257.Google Scholar
  12. Languis M.L. and Miller D.C. Development and utilisation of single trial evoked potential analysis using forward and back averaging of marked EEG. BASIS newsletter. 1989, Nov: 3–6.Google Scholar
  13. NÄÄtÄnen, R., PÄÄvilainen, P. and Reinikainen, K. Do event-related potentials to infrequent decrements in duration of auditory stimuli demonstrate a memory trace in man? Neuroscience Letters, 1989, 107 (Suppl. 1): 347–52.Google Scholar
  14. Niedermeyer, E. The normal EEG of the waking adult. In: E. Niedermeyer and F. E. Lopes da Silva (Eds.), Electroencephalography: Basic principles, clinical applications and related fields (3rd Edition), Williams and Wilkins, 1993: 131–152.Google Scholar
  15. Picton, T.W. The endogenous evoked potentials. In: E. Basar and T. Melnechuk (Eds.). Dynamics of sensory and cognitive processing by the brain (1st Edition). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988: 258–265.Google Scholar
  16. Picton, T.W. and Hillyard, S.A. Endogenous ERPs. In: T.W. Picton (Ed.), Handbook of Electroencephalography: Event related potentials (1st Edition). Elsevier, New York, 1988: 361–416.Google Scholar
  17. Polich, J., Howard, L. and Starr, A. Effects of age on the P300 component of the event related potential from auditory stimuli: Peak definition, variation and measurement. Journal of Gerontology, 1985, 40(6): 721–726.Google Scholar
  18. Polich, J. Normal variation of P300 from auditory stimuli. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1986, 65: 236–240.Google Scholar
  19. Polich, J. P300 in clinical applications. Am. J. EEG Technol., 1991, 31, 201–231.Google Scholar
  20. Polich, J. On the clinical application of the P300. Biological Psychiatry, 1992, 31: 647–649.Google Scholar
  21. Pritchard, W.S. Psychophysiology of P300. Psychological Bulletin, 1981, 89(3): 506–540.Google Scholar
  22. Remond, A. and Lesevre, N. Variations in the average Visual Evoked Potential as a function of the Alpha Rhythm phase (“Autostimulation”). In: W. Cobb and C. Morocutti (Eds.), The Evoked Potentials. Proceedings of International Meeting held in Siena (Italy) 1966. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1967: 42–51.Google Scholar
  23. Romani, A., Callieco, R. and Cosi, V. Pre-stimulus spectral EEG patterns and the evoked auditory vertex response. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1988, 70: 270–272.Google Scholar
  24. Squires, K.C. and Donchin, E. Beyond averaging: The use of discriminant functions to recognise event related potentials elicited by auditory stimuli. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1976, 41: 449–459.Google Scholar
  25. Squires, K.C., Wickens, C., Squires, N.K. and Donchin, E. The effect of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical event related potential. Science, 1976, 193: 1142–1146.Google Scholar
  26. Stampfer, H.G. An analysis of preparation and response activity in P300 experiments in humans. In: E. Basar and T. Melnechuk (Eds.), Dynamics of sensory and cognitive processing by the brain (1st Edition). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988: 276–286.Google Scholar
  27. Van Dijk, J.G., Caekebeke, J.F.V., Jennekens-Schinkel, A. and Zwinderman, A. H. Background EEG reactivity in auditory event related potentials. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1992, 83: 44–51.Google Scholar
  28. Verbaten, M.N., Roelofs, J.W., Sjouw, W. and Slangen, J.L. Habituation of early and late visual ERP components and the orienting reaction: The effect of stimulus information. Int. J. Psychophysiol., 1986, 3(Suppl. 4): 287–98.Google Scholar
  29. Woods, D.L., Courchesne, E., Hillyard, S.A. and Galambos R. Recovery cycles of event-related potentials in multiple detection tasks. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1980, 50:335–347.Google Scholar
  30. Wright, J.J., Sergejew, A.A. and Stampfer, H.G. Inverse filter computation of the neural impulse giving rise to the auditory evoked potential. Brain Topography, 1990, 2:293–302.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregory W. Price
    • 1
  1. 1.Clinical Electrophysiology UnitWolston Park HospitalBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Clinical Electrophysiology UnitWolston Park HospitalWacolAustralia

Personalised recommendations