Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 24–28 | Cite as

Role of the spatial organization of efferent projections of the striopallidum in cortical and thalamic function

  • N. F. Suvorov
  • L. K. Danilova
  • A. I. Gorbachevskaya
  • S. F. Ermolenko
Article
Received:
  • 13 Downloads

Conclusions

  1. 1.

    The relative uniformity of cellular structure of the nuclei of the striopallidum and the wide overlapping of their efferent connections in the cortex and thalamus are one cause of the common features of striatal influences on behavior.

     
  2. 2.

    Special features of the spatial organization of striatal projections in the cortical and thalamic structures of the brain are comparable with the functional heterogeneity of striatal formations.

     

Keywords

Cellular Structure Spatial Organization Functional Heterogeneity Efferent Projection Efferent Connection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. 1.
    O. S. Adrianov and N. P. Shugalev, in: Proceedings of a Symposium on Mechanisms of Organization of Movements [in Russian], Leningrad (1976), p. 7.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. A. Al'tova, in: Functional and Structural Principles of Activity of Brain Systems and Mechanisms of Brain Plasticity [in Russian], No. 3, Moscow (1974), p. 36.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    É. B. Arushanyan and V. A. Otellin, The Caudate Nucleus [in Russian], Nauka, Leningrad (1976).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. B. Dzugaeva, V. A. Sorokin, and A. I. L'vovich, in: Functional and Structural Principles of Activity of Brain Systems and Mechanisms of Brain Plasticity [in Russian], No. 3, Moscow (1974), p. 27.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    I. S. Egorova, in: Structural and Functional Mechanisms of Cortical Integration [in Russian], Gor'kii (1976), p. 22.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. N. Litvinova and E. P. Lukhanina, Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,26, No. 2, 343 (1976).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. P. Lukhanina and A. N. Litvinova, Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,27, No. 3, 505 (1977).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. F. Suvorov, Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,27, No. 3, 451 (1977).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. F. Suvorov, A. I. Gorbachevskaya, and S. F. Ermolenko, Fiziol. Zh. SSSR,65, No. 4, 527 (1977).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. F. Suvorov, V. A. Otellin, and S. F. Ermolenko, Arkh. Anat. Gistol. Émbriol.,73, No. 11, 52 (1977).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. F. Suvorov, Yu. T. Shapkov, and K. B. Shapovalova, Fiziol. Zh. SSSR,63, No. 2, 191 (1977).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. A. Cherkes, Usp. Fiziol. Nauk,8, No. 4, 120 (1977).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    N. A. Buchwald, E. J. Wyers, J. Carlin, and R. Farly, Anat. Rec.,136, 172 (1960).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    K. M. Campbell and R. E. Dill, Exp. Neurol.,42, No. 3, 555 (1974).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. M. K. Delgado, Int. Rev. Neurobiol.,6, 349 (1964).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. R. Delong, J. Neurophysiol.,34, No. 3, 414 (1971).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. Denny-Brown and N. Yanagisawa, The Basal Ganglia, M. D. Yahr, ed., Raven Press, New York (1976), p. 115.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    G. Heuser, N. A. Buchwald, and E. J. Wyers, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.,13, No. 4, 519 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. S. Levine, C. D. Hull, and N. A. Buchwald, Exp. Neurol.,44, No. 2, 448 (1974).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. J. Potegal, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.,69, No. 4, 756 (1969).PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. F. Suvorov
    • 1
  • L. K. Danilova
    • 1
  • A. I. Gorbachevskaya
    • 1
  • S. F. Ermolenko
    • 1
  1. 1.I. P. Pavlov Institute of PhysiologyAcademy of Sciences of the USSRLeningrad

Personalised recommendations