Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 247–255 | Cite as

Scientific inquiry, assessment, and logic: Comments on Bowers and Mahoney—DeMonbreun

  • Walter B. Weimer


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bunge, M.Scientific research (2 vols.). New York: Springer Verlag, 1967.Google Scholar
  2. Kuhn, T. S. Second thoughts on paradigms. In F. Suppe (Ed.),The structure of scientific theories. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1974. Pp. 459–482.Google Scholar
  3. Lakatos, I. Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.),Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970. Pp. 91–195.Google Scholar
  4. Maxwell, G. Induction and empiricism: A Bayesian-frequentist alternative. In G. Maxwell & R. M. Anderson, Jr. (Eds.),Induction, probability, and confirmation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1975. Pp. 106–165.Google Scholar
  5. Weimer, W. B. The history of psychology and its retrieval from historiography (2 parts).Science Studies 1974,4 235–258; 367–396.Google Scholar
  6. Weimer, W. B. Science as a rhetorical transaction: Toward a nonjustificational conception of rhetoric.Philosophy and Rhetoric 1977,10 1–29.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walter B. Weimer
    • 1
  1. 1.Pennsylvania State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations