Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 229–238 | Cite as

Psychology of the scientist: An analysis of problem-solving bias

  • Michael J. Mahoney
  • Bobby G. DeMonbreun


The problem-solving skills of 30 Ph.D. scientists were compared to those of 15 conservative Protestant ministers. Of particular interest was the frequency with which these groups generated confirmatory (rather than disconfirmatory)experiments to test their hypotheses. Experimental results showed that—contrary to a popular assumption—the reasoning skills of the scientists were not significantly different from those of nonscientists. In this study, the ministers showed a longer latency to speculation and generated more experiments per hypothesis than did the scientists. These findings are discussed in terms of the psychology of the scientist.


Cognitive Psychology Longe Latency Reasoning Skill Protestant Minister 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bacon, F.Novum organum. (original 1621). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1889.Google Scholar
  2. Greenwald, A. G. Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.Psychological Bulletin 1975,82 1–20.Google Scholar
  3. Lakatos, I., & Musgrave, A. (Eds.),Criticism and the growth of knowledge. London: Cambridge University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  4. Mahoney, M. J.Cognition and behavior modification. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger, 1974.Google Scholar
  5. Mahoney, M. J.Scientist as subject. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger, 1976.Google Scholar
  6. Mitroff, I. I.The subjective side of science. New York: Elsevier, 1974.Google Scholar
  7. Popper, K.Objective knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  8. Rokeach, M.The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books, 1960.Google Scholar
  9. Wason, P. C. On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1960,12 129–140.Google Scholar
  10. Wason, P. C., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (Eds.),Thinking and reasoning. Baltimore: Penguin, 1968.Google Scholar
  11. Wason, P. C., & Johnson-Laird, P. N.Psychology of reasoning. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  12. Weimer, W. B.Psychology and the conceptual foundations of science. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, in press.Google Scholar
  13. West, S. S. The ideology of academic scientists.IRE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1960, June, 54–62.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael J. Mahoney
    • 1
  • Bobby G. DeMonbreun
    • 1
  1. 1.Pennsylvania State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations