Advertisement

Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 85, Issue 4, pp 2431–2436 | Cite as

The use of critical load exceedances in abatement strategy planning

  • Gun Lövblad
  • Peringe Grennfelt
  • Olle Westling
  • Harald Sverdrup
  • Per Warfvinge
Part V Critical Loads

Abstract

Critical loads for sulphur and nitrogen are defined to produce effective control strategies over Europe, such as those of the new sulphur protocol. To determine the critical load exceedances on the European scale it is necessary to simplify and generalize. The spatial variation on a scale smaller than the 150 × 150 km EMEP grid squares is considered for critical loads, via a cumulative frequency distribution and the 95 percentile for the grid square is determined. The deposition is assumed to be uniform over the area and the exceedance over the 95 percentile critical load is determined. In reality, the spatial variation is considerable for critical loads as well as for deposition. Calculations based on the frequency of local critical load exceedances have been made for two grid squares in southern Sweden. Local critical loads for acidity are compared to local deposition. Deposition variations due to pollution gradients within the square and to ecosystem structure have been considered. The results are similar for the two squares. The calculations based on local exceedances on 50×50 km grid squares and consideration to landuse variability, indicate that in order to protect 95% of the ecosystems in the square, emission reductions 25% greater than the large-scale European approach are needed. The effect of enhanced deposition at forest edges is of relatively small importance for the total exceedance.

Keywords

Critical loads acidity sulphur variability abatement strategy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Downing, R.J., Hettelingh, J-P. & de Smet, P.A.M. (Eds.) (1993) Calculation and Mapping of Critical Loads in Europe: Status Report 1993. RIVM Report, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  2. Hallgren-Larsson, E. & Westling, O. (1993a, b, c) Luftfororeningar i Sverige. Nedfall och effekter okt. 1992 till sept. 1993. IVL Reports B-1133, 1139 and 1150. Swedish Environmental Res. Inst., IVL-Aneboda, Sweden. In Swedish, English summary.Google Scholar
  3. Lövblad, G., Pedersen, U., Andersen, B., Hovmand, M., Joffre, S. & Reissell, A. (1992) Mapping deposition of sulphur, nitrogen and base cations in the Nordic countries. IVL Report B-1055, Swedish Environmental Res. Inst., Göteborg, Sweden.Google Scholar
  4. Lövblad, G., Erisman, J.W. & Fowler, D. (Eds.) (1993) Models and Methods for the Quantification of Atmospheric Input to Ecosystems. Nordiste Seminarog Arbejdsrapporter 1993:573. The Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  5. Lövblad, G., Grennfelt, P., Westling, O., Sverdrup, H. & Warfvinge, P. (1995) Hur påverkas bedömningen av ett områdes kritiska belastning av variabilitet i tid och rum? IVL-Report for the National Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Swedish Environmental Res. Inst., Göteborg 1995-01-30. In Swedish, English summary.Google Scholar
  6. Tuovinen, J-P., Barrett, K. & Styve, H. (1994) Transboundary Acidifying Pollution in Europe: Calculated fields and budgets 1985–1993. EMEP/MSC-W Report 1/94. The Norwegian Meteorological Inst., Blindem, Norway.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gun Lövblad
    • 1
  • Peringe Grennfelt
    • 1
  • Olle Westling
    • 1
  • Harald Sverdrup
    • 2
  • Per Warfvinge
    • 2
  1. 1.Swedish Environmental Research Institute (IVL)GöteborgSweden
  2. 2.Department of Chemical Techn.Lund Institute of TechnologyLundSweden

Personalised recommendations