Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 85, Issue 4, pp 2119–2124

Orographic enhancement of wet deposition in the United Kingdom: case studies and modelling

  • Inglis D. W. F. 
  • Choularton T. W. 
  • Wicks A. J. 
  • Fowler D. 
  • Leith I. D. 
  • Werkman B. 
  • Binnie J. 
Part III Deposition Processes
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

Two field experiments to observe the detailed response of wet deposition to orography in a polluted environment are reported. Rain events were classed as frontal, convective or mixed on the basis of meteorological data. Analysis of the deposition enhancement and cap cloud composition confirmed that for the frontal events the seeder-feeder effect (scavenging of cap cloud by rain drops) dominates. The greater concentration of ions in the water scavenged from the cap cloud than in the rain means that deposition is enhanced for all ions. For marine ions the scavenged water was found to be between five and six times as concentrated as the rain and for anthropogenically produced ions it was about twice as concentrated.

A computational model of rainfall incorporating the seeder-feeder effect has been broadly successful in predicting enhancement although some details of the observed pattern remain to be explained.

Convective events were only important in the deposition of marine ions although this may not be the case in the summer months. Convective events were found not to be subject to the seeder-feeder effect.

Keywords

Wet Deposition Orographic Rainfall Pollution Seeder-feeder Effect 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bader M.J. and Roach W.T.: 1977, “Orographic Rainfall in Warm Sectors of Depressions”, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society,103, 269–280.Google Scholar
  2. Carruthers D.J. and Choularton T.W.: 1983, “A model of the seeder-feeder mechanism of orographic rain including stratification and wind drift effects”, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society,109, 575–588.Google Scholar
  3. Carruthers D.J. and Hunt J.C.R.: 1990, “Fluid Mechanics of Air Over Hills: Turbulence, Fluxes, and Waves in the Boundary Layer”, American Met. Soc., Meteorological Monographs,23, No.45.Google Scholar
  4. Dore A.J., Choularton T.W., Brown R. and Blackall R.M.: 1992, “Orographic rainfall enhancement in the mountains of the Lake district and Snowdonia”, Atmospheric Environment,26, No. 3, 357–371.Google Scholar
  5. Fowler D., Leith I., Binnie G., Crossley A., Inglis D.W.F. and Choularton T.W.: 1995, Submitted to this volume.Google Scholar
  6. Inglis D.W.F., Choularton T.W. and Wicks A.J.: 1995, “The Effect of Orography on Wet Deposition in and Industrial Area”, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society,121, to appear Oct 1995.Google Scholar
  7. Weast R.C.: 1978, “CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 59th Edition”, CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Inglis D. W. F. 
    • 1
  • Choularton T. W. 
    • 1
  • Wicks A. J. 
    • 1
  • Fowler D. 
    • 2
  • Leith I. D. 
    • 2
  • Werkman B. 
    • 2
  • Binnie J. 
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsU.M.I.S.T.ManchesterUK
  2. 2.Institute of Terrestrial EcologyPenicuikUK

Personalised recommendations