Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 79, Issue 3, pp 353–359 | Cite as

The effects of promoter on transient expression in conifer cell lines

  • F. Bekkaoui
  • R. S. S. Datla
  • M. Pilon
  • T. E. Tautorus
  • W. L. Crosby
  • D. I. Dunstan
Originals

Summary

Protoplasts from suspension cultures of somatic embryos of white spruce (Picea glauca Moench Voss) were electroporated with plasmids containing the chimeric genes for chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) or β-glucuronidase (GUS), under control of one of three promoters. Transient CAT gene expression of approximately equal magnitude resulted when the CAT gene was fused to either the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter or the nopaline synthase (NOS) promoter. When the CAT gene was fused to a tandem repeat CaMV 35S promoter (pPBI-363), CAT enzyme activity compared to NOS or 35S promoters increased up to eightfold (cell line WS-34), and were up to 100-fold greater than control (electroporated without plasmid). Comparatively, protoplasts of black spruce (Picea mariana Mill) and jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.), electroporated with pPBI-363, produced increases in CAT activity compared to control of 90-fold and 70-fold, respectively. White spruce (WS-34) protoplasts were subsequently electroporated with the GUS gene fused to the tandem repeat CaMV 35S promoter. Comparatively, GUS enzyme activity increased up to tenfold compared to GUS fused to a CaMV 35S promoter. The results indicated that transient expression of the CAT and GUS genes was influenced by the type of promoter and cell line used, as well as by electroporation conditions.

Key words

Conifer Electroporation Promoter CAT GUS 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold S von, Eriksson T (1981) In vitro studies of adventitious shoot formation inPinus conforta. Can J Bot 59:870–874Google Scholar
  2. Attree SM, Bekkaoui F, Dunstan DI, Fowke LC (1987) Regeneration of somatic embryos from protoplasts isolated from an embryogenic suspension culture of white spruce (Picea glauca). Plant Cell Rep 6:480–483Google Scholar
  3. Attree SM, Dunstan DI, Fowke LC (1989) Improved regeneration of protoplasts from embryogenic suspension cultures of white spruce (Picea glaucd). Can J Bot 67:1790–1795Google Scholar
  4. Bates GW, Piastuch W, Riggs CD, Rabussay D (1988) Electroporation for DNA delivery to plant protoplast. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 12:213–218Google Scholar
  5. Bekkaoui F, Dunstan DI (1989) Permeabilization ofPicea glauca protoplasts to macromolecules. Can J For Res 19:1316–1321Google Scholar
  6. Bekkaoui F, Saxena PK, Attree SM, Fowke LC, Dunstan DI (1987) The isolation and culture of protoplasts from an embryogenic cell suspension culture ofPicea glauca (Moench) Voss. Plant Cell Rep 6:476–479Google Scholar
  7. Bekkaoui F, Pilon M, Lain/'e E, Raju DSS, Crosby WL, Dunstan DI (1988) Transient gene expression in electroporatedPicea glauca protoplasts. Plant Cell Rep 7:481–484Google Scholar
  8. Bevan M (1984) BinaryAgrobacterium vectors for plant transformation. Nucl Acids Res 12:8711–8721PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bevan MW, Mason SE, Goelet P (1985) Expression of tobacco mosaic virus coat protein by a cauliflower mosaic virus promoter in plants transformed byAgrobacterium. EMBO J 4:1921–1926Google Scholar
  10. Dandekar AM, Gupta PK, Durzan DJ, Knauf V (1987) Transformation and foreign gene expression in micropropagated Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). Bio/Technol 5:587–590Google Scholar
  11. Fromm ME, Taylor LP, Walbot V (1985) Expression of genes transferred into monocot and dicot plant cells by electroporation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:5824–5828PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fromm ME, Taylor LP, Walbot V (1986) Stable transformation of maize after gene transfer by electroporation. Nature 319:791–793PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gorman CM, Moffat LF, Howard BH (1982) Recombinant genomes with express chloramphenicol acetyl transferase in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol 2:1044–1051PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gupta PK, Dandekar AM, Durzan DJ (1988) Somatic proembryo formation and transient expression of a luciferase gene in douglas fir and loblolly pine protoplasts. Plant Sci 58: 85–92Google Scholar
  15. Hakman IL, Fowke LC (1987) An embryogenic cell suspension culture ofPicea glauca (white spruce). Plant Cell Rep 6: 20–22Google Scholar
  16. Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW (1987) GUS fusions: glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J 6:3901–3907PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Junker B, Zymny J, Luhrs R, Lörz H (1987) Transient expression of chimaeric genes in dividing and non-dividing cereal protoplasts after PEG-induced DNA uptake. Plant Cell Rep 6:329–332Google Scholar
  18. Kay R, Chan A, Daly M, McPherson J (1987) Duplication of CaMV 35S promoter sequences creates a strong enhancer for plant genes. Science 236:1299–1302Google Scholar
  19. Langridge WHR, Li BJ, Szalay AA (1985) Electric field-mediated stable transformation of carrot protoplasts with naked DNA. Plant Cell Rep 4:355–359Google Scholar
  20. Litvay JD, Johnson MA, Verma D, Einsphar D, Weyrauch K (1981) Conifer suspension culture medium development using analytical data from developing seeds. Institute Paper Chemistry Technical Paper Series No. 115, Appelton/WIGoogle Scholar
  21. Sederoff R, Stomp A-M, Chilton WS, Moore LW (1986) Gene transfer into loblolly pine byAgrobacterium tumefaciens. Bio/Technol 4:647–649Google Scholar
  22. Shigekawa K, Dower WJ (1988) Electroporation of eukaryotes and prokaryotes: a general approach to the introduction of macromolecules into cells. Biotechniques 6:742–751PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Shillito RD, Saul MW, Paszkowski J, Müller M, Potrykus I (1985) High efficiency direct gene transfer to plants. Bio/ Technol 3:1099–1103Google Scholar
  24. Shiou A, Smith JM (1988) Improved CAT gene cassette for promoter analysis and genetic constructions. Gene 67: 295–299PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Tautorus TE, Bekkaoui F, Pilon M, Datla RSS, Crosby WL, Fowke LC, Dunstan DI (1989) Factors affecting transient gene expression in electroporated black spruce (Picea mariana) and jack pine (Pinus banksiana) protoplasts. Theor Appl Genet 78:531–536Google Scholar
  26. Werr W, Lörz H (1986) Transient gene expression in a Gramineae cell line. A rapid procedure for studying plant promoters. Mol Gen Genet 202:471–475Google Scholar
  27. Widholm JM (1972) The use of fluorescein diacetate and phenosafranine for determining viability of cultured plant cells. Stain Technol 6:189–194Google Scholar
  28. Wilson SM, Thorpe TA, Moloney MM (1989) PEG-mediated expression of GUS and CAT genes expression in protoplasts from embryogenic suspension cultures ofPicea glauca. Plant Cell Rep 7:704–707Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Bekkaoui
    • 1
  • R. S. S. Datla
    • 1
  • M. Pilon
    • 2
  • T. E. Tautorus
    • 1
  • W. L. Crosby
    • 1
  • D. I. Dunstan
    • 1
  1. 1.Plant Biotechnology InstituteSaskatoonCanada
  2. 2.Unit for Applied Cell and Molecular BiologyUniversity of UmeáUmeáSweden

Personalised recommendations