Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 87, Issue 3, pp 295–304 | Cite as

Evaluation of five strategies for obtaining a core subset from a large genetic resource collection of durum wheat

  • P. L. Spagnoletti Zeuli
  • C. O. Qualset
Article

Abstract

The use of plant genetic resources contained in a large collection may be enhanced by specifying subsamples, called core samples. Five strategies for selecting a core sample from a collection of 3000 durum wheat accessions were applied and evaluated using four qualitative and eight quantitative spike characters. Each of the following strategies generated about 500 accessions for the core sample: random, random-systematic according to chronology of entry of the accessions into the collection, stratified by countryof-origin, stratified by log frequency by country-of-origin, and stratified by canonical variables. The first three strategies produced samples representative of the whole collection, but the remaining two produced the desired effect of increasing frequencies from less-represented countries-of-origin for several characters. The stratified canonical sample increased phenotypic variances. The quality of core samples is dependent upon good passport and evaluation data to partition the collection. The multivariate approach is extremely useful, but requires considerable data from the whole collection. Ecogeographic origin may be used in the absence of evaluation data on several characters to select useful core samples.

Key words

Triticum turgidum L. durum group Genetic resource conservation Core collection 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown AHD (1989a) Core collections: a practical approach to genetic resources management. Genome 31:818–824Google Scholar
  2. Brown AHD (1989b) The case for core collections. In: Brown AHD, Frankel OH, Marshall DR, Williams JT (eds) The use of plant genetic resources. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 136–156Google Scholar
  3. Frankel OH, Brown AHD (1984) Plant genetic resources today: a critical appraisal. In: Holden JHW, Williams JT (eds) Crop genetic resources: conservation and evaluation. Allen and Unwin, Winchester, Massachusetts, pp 249–268Google Scholar
  4. Growth JV, Roelfs AD (1987) The concept and measurement of phenotypic diversity inPuccinia graminis on wheat. Phytopathology 77:1395–1399Google Scholar
  5. Harlan JR (1972) Genetic resources in sorghum. In: Rao NGP, House LR (eds) Sorghum in the seventies. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  6. Jain SK, Qualset CO, Bhatt GM, Wu KK (1975) Geographical patterns of phenotypic diversity in a world collection of durum wheats. Crop Sci 15:700–704Google Scholar
  7. Kimura M, Crow JF (1964) The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics 49:725–738Google Scholar
  8. Peeters JP, Martinelli JA (1989) Hierarchial cluster analysis as a tool to manage variation in germplasm collections. Theor Appl Genet 78:42–48Google Scholar
  9. Pimentel RA (1979) Morphometrics. The multivariate analysis of biological data. Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque, IowaGoogle Scholar
  10. Qualset CO, Puri YP (1974) Sources of earliness and winter habit in durum wheat. Wheat Inf Serv 38:13–15Google Scholar
  11. Qualset CO, Carvalho FIF, Vogt HE (1976) A comparison of the theoretical variance in tetraploid wheat leaf traits with implications on optimum sampling size. Agron Sulriograndense 12:97–109Google Scholar
  12. SAS Institute Inc. (1987) SAS Application Guide, 1987 edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  13. Seal H (1964) Multivariate statistical analysis for biologists. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Spagnoletti Zeuli PL, Qualset CO (1987) Geographical diversity for quantitative spike characters in a world collection of durum wheat. Crop Sci 27:235–241Google Scholar
  15. Spagnoletti Zeuli PL, Qualset CO (1990) Variation for flag leaf dimensions in durum wheat germplasm from different geographic origins. Plant Breed 105:189–202Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. L. Spagnoletti Zeuli
    • 1
  • C. O. Qualset
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of BasilicataPotenzaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Agronomy and Range ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations