Brain Topography

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 41–51 | Cite as

Sources of attention-sensitive visual event-related potentials

  • Carlos M. Gomez Gonzalez
  • Vincent P. Clark
  • Silu Fan
  • Steven J. Luck
  • Steven A. Hillyard


In a study of the neural processes that mediate visual attention in humans, 32-channel recordings of event-related potentials were obtained from 14 normal subjects while they performed a spatial attention task. The generator locations of the early C1, P1, and Nl components of the visual evoked response were estimated by means of topographic maps of voltage and current source density in conjunction with dipole modelling. The topography of the C1 component (ca. 85 ms post-stimulus) was consistent with a generator in striate cortex, and this component was unaffected by attention. In contrast, the P1 and Nl components (ca. 95 and 170ms) exhibited current density foci at scalp sites overlying lateral extrastriate cortex and were larger for attended stimuli than for unattended stimuli. The voltage topographies in the 75–175 ms latency range were modeled with a 5-dipole configuration consisting of a single striate dipole and left-right pairs of dipoles located in lateral extrastriate and inferior occipito-temporal areas. This model was found to account for the voltage topographies produced by both attended and unattended stimuli with low residual variance. These results support the proposal that visual-spatial attention modulates neural activity in extrastriate visual cortex but does not affect the initial evoked response in striate cortex.

Key words

Event-related potential Visual-spatial attention Source localization Dipole Current source density 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aine, C.J., Bodis-Wollner, I. and George, J.S. Generators of visually evoked neuromagnetic responses: Spatial-frequency segregation and evidence for multiple sources. In: S. Sato (Ed.), Advances in Neurology: Magnetoencephalography, 54. Raven Press, New York, 1990: 141–155.Google Scholar
  2. Aine, C.J., Supek, S. and George, J.S. Temporal dynamics of visual-evoked magnetic sources: Effect of stimulus parameters and selective attention. International Journal of Neuroscience, in press.Google Scholar
  3. Clark, V.P., Courchesne, E. and Grafe, M. In vivo myeloarchitectonic analysis of human striate and extrastriate cortex using magnetic resonance imaging. Cerebral Cortex, 1992, 2: 417–424.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark, V.P. Localization and identification of functional regions within the human visual system. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego, 1993.Google Scholar
  5. Corbetta, M., Miezin, F.M., Dobmeyer, S., Shulman, G.L. and Petersen, S.E. Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography. Journal of Neuroscience, 1991, 11: 2383–2402.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dale, A.M. and Sereno, M.I. Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: A linear approach. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1993, 5: 162–176.Google Scholar
  7. Desimone, R. and Ungerleider, L.G. Neural mechanisms of visual processing in monkeys. In: F. Boller and J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of Neuropsychology, 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1989: 267–299.Google Scholar
  8. Desimone, R., Wessinger, M., Thomas, L. and Schneider, W. Attentional control of visual perception: Cortical and subcortical mechanisms. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology, 1990, 55: 963–971.Google Scholar
  9. Duncan, J. The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. Psychological Review, 1980, 87: 272–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Eason, R., Harter, M. and White, C. Effects of attention and arousal on visually evoked cortical potentials and reaction time in man. Physiology and Behavior, 1969, 4: 283–289.Google Scholar
  11. Eason, R.G., Oakley, M. and Flowers, L. Central neural influences on the human retina during selective attention. Physiological Psychology, 1983, 11: 18–28.Google Scholar
  12. Felleman, D.J. and Van Essen, D.C. Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 1991, 1: 1–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hackley, S.A., Woldorff, M. and Hillyard, S.A. Cross-modal selective attention effects on retinal, myogenic, brainstem and cerebral evoked potentials. Psychophysiology, 1990, 27: 195–208.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Harter, M.R. and Anllo-Vento, L. Visual-spatial attention: Preparation and selection in children and adults. In: C.H.M. Brunia, G. Mulder and M.N. Verbaten (Eds.), Event-Related Potentials of the Brain. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1991: 183–194.Google Scholar
  15. Hawkins, H.L., Hillyard, S.A., Luck, S.J., Mouloua, M., Downing, C.J. and Woodward, D.P. Visual attention modulates signal detectability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1990, 16: 802–811.Google Scholar
  16. Haxby, J.V., Grady, C.L., Horwitz, B., Ungerleider, L.G., Mishikin, M., Carson, R.E., Herscovitch, P., Schapiro, M.B. and Rapoport, S.I. Dissociation of object and spatial visual processing pathways in human extrastriate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1991, 88: 1621–1625.Google Scholar
  17. Henderson, J.M. Stimulus discrimination following covert attentional orienting to an exogenous cue. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1991, 17: 91–106.Google Scholar
  18. Jeffreys, D.A. and Axford, J.G. Source locations of pattern specific components of human visual evoked potentials. I: Components of striate cortical origin. Experimental Brain Research, 1972, 16: 1–21.Google Scholar
  19. Jennings, J.R. and Wood, C.C. The e-adjustment procedure for repeated-measures analyses of variance. Psychophysiology, 1976, 13: 277–278.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Jonides, J. Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In: J.B. Long and A.D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and Performance, IX. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1981.Google Scholar
  21. Luck, S.J., Heinze, H.J., Mangun, G.R. and Hillyard, S.A. Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within bilateral stimulus arrays. II. Functional dissociation of P1 and N1 components. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1990, 75: 528–542.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Luck, S.J., Fan, S. and Hillyard, S.A. Attention-related modulation of sensory-evoked brain activity in a visual search task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1993, 5: 188–195.Google Scholar
  23. Luck, S.J., Hillyard, S.A., Mouloua, M., Woldorff, M.G., Clark, V.P. and Hawkins, H.L. Effects of spatial cuing on luminance detectability: Psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence for early selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, in press.Google Scholar
  24. Mangun, G.R., Hansen, J.C. and Hillyard, S.A. Electroretinograms reveal no evidence for centrifugal modulation of retinal input during selective attention in man. Psychophysiology, 1986, 23: 156–165.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mangun, G.R. and Hillyard, S.A. Spatial gradients of visual attention: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1988, 70: 417–428.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Mangun, G.R. and Hillyard, S.A. Electrophysiological studies of visual selective attention in humans. In: A.B. Scheibel and A.F. Wechsler (Eds.), Neurobiology of Higher Cognitive Function. Guilford, New York, 1990: 271–295.Google Scholar
  27. Mangun, G.R. and Hillyard, S.A. Modulations of sensory evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1991, 17: 1057–1074.Google Scholar
  28. Mangun, G.R., Luck, S.J., Gazzaniga, M.S. and Hillyard, S.A. Electrophysiological measures of interhemispheric transfer of visual information in split brain patients. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 1991, 17: 866.Google Scholar
  29. Mangun, G.R., Hillyard, S.A. and Luck, S.J. Electrocortical substrates of visual selective attention. In: D. Meyer and S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and Performance XIV. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1993: 219–243.Google Scholar
  30. McCarthy, G. and Scabini, D. Attention modifies event-related potentials recorded from human visual cortex. IBRO World Congress of Neuroscience, 1991, 3: 176.Google Scholar
  31. Mitzdorf, U. Current source-density method and application in cat cerebral cortex: Investigation of evoked potentials and EEG phenomena. Physiological Review, 1985, 65: 37–100.Google Scholar
  32. Naatanen, R. Attention and brain function. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1992.Google Scholar
  33. Ossenblok, P. The sources of the pattern VEP in man. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1992.Google Scholar
  34. Pernier, J., Perrin, F. and Bertrand, O. Scalp current density fields: Concept and properties. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1988, 69: 385–389.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Perrin, F., Bertrand, O. and Pernier, J. Scalp current density mapping: Value and estimation from potential data. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1987:283–288.Google Scholar
  36. Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O. and Echallier, J.F. Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1989, 72: 184–187.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Posner, M.I. Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1980, 32: 3–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Rugg, M.D., Lines, C.R. and Milner, A.D. Visual evoked potentials to lateralized visual stimuli and the measurement of interhemispheric transmission time. Neuropsychologia, 1984, 22: 215–225.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Rugg, M.D., Milner, A.D., Lines, C.R. and Phalp, R. Modulation of visual event-related potentials by spatial and non-spatial visual selective attention. Neuropsychologia, 1987, 25: 85–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Scherg, M. Fundamentals of dipole source potential analysis. In: F. Grandori, M. Hoke and G.L. Romani (Eds.), Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields and Potentials. Advances in Audiology, 6. Karger, Basel, 1990: 40–69.Google Scholar
  41. Scherg, M. and Berg, P. Use of prior knowledge in brain electromagnetic source analysis. Brain Topography, 1991, 4: 143–150.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Simpson, G.V., Scherg, M., Ritter, W. and Vaughan, H.G., Jr. Localization and temporal activity functions of brain sources generating the human visual ERP. In: C.H.M. Brunia, A. W.K. Gaillard and A. Kok (Eds.), Psychophysiological Brain Research, 1. Tilburg University Press, 1990:99–105.Google Scholar
  43. Sperling, G. A.unified theory of attention and signal detection. In: R. Parasuraman and D.R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of Attention. Academic Press, London, 1984: 103–181.Google Scholar
  44. Stensaas, S.S., Eddington, D.K. and Dobelle, W.H. The topography and variability of the primary visual cortex in man. Journal of Neurosurgery, 1974, 40: 747–755.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Woldorff, M., Hansen, J.C. and Hillyard, S.A. Evidence for effects of selective attention to the mid latency range of the human auditory event related potential. In: R. Johnson (Ed.), Current Research in Event-Related Brain Potentials. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987: 146–154.Google Scholar
  46. Woldorff, M. Distortion of ERP averages due to overlap from temporally adjacent ERPS: Analysis and correction. Psychophysiology, 1993, 30: 38.Google Scholar
  47. Woldorff, M.G., Gallen, C.C., Hampson, S.A., Hillyard, S.A., Pantev, C., Sobel, D. and Bloom, F.E. Modulation of early sensory processing in human auditory cortex during auditory selective attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1993, 90: 8722–8726.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos M. Gomez Gonzalez
    • 1
  • Vincent P. Clark
    • 2
  • Silu Fan
    • 3
  • Steven J. Luck
    • 4
  • Steven A. Hillyard
    • 4
  1. 1.Laboratory of PsychobiologyUniversity of SevillaSpain
  2. 2.Laboratory of Psychology and PsychopathologyNIMH, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaUSA
  3. 3.Institute of PsychologyAcademia SinicaBeijingChina
  4. 4.Department of NeurosciencesUniversity of CaliforniaSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations