AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 322–327

Relativity theory of information and communication in natural language

Open Forum
  • 66 Downloads

Abstract

The present paper is meant to summarise and enlighten the theoretical implications of the twin theories of text comprehension and of text compression. Compatibility and non-exclusiveness of particle-like analysis of language and wave-like analysis of intentionality are also demonstrated within the newly established quantum linguistics framework. The informative state of language is viewed as being relatively stable; once activated and subject to motion, therefore reaching a communicative state, different phenomena occur, which may be observed, analysed and visualised through CPP-TRS observational devices. Relativity theory may therefore be organised in terms of quanta with continuity and no contradiction.

Keywords

Communicative positioning Intentionality Information visuality Textual perception Textual resolution enhancement 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ballmer, T. (1975). Sprachrekonstruktionssysteme und einige ihrer Anwendungsmoglichkeiten inSatz-und Textlinguistik. Taunus Schriptor, Kronenberg.Google Scholar
  2. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
  3. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  4. De Beargrande, R.A. and Dressler, W. (1981). Einfuhrung in die Textlinguistik. Max Niemeyer Verlag, Tuningen.Google Scholar
  5. Eco, U. (1975). Trattato di semiotica. Bompiani, Milan.Google Scholar
  6. Einstein, A. (1905). Elektrodynamik bewegter Koerper,Annalen der Phyusik.17 891–921.Google Scholar
  7. Lehnert, W.G. (1981). ‘Plot Units and Narrative Summarization’.Cognitive Science. 2 293–331.Google Scholar
  8. Minsky, M. (1975). A Framework for Representing Knowledge. In: Winston, P. (ed.)The Psychology of Computer Vision, McGraw-Hill, New York, 221–227.Google Scholar
  9. Sebeok, T.A. (ed.) (1960). Style in Language. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  10. Schank, R.C. (1972). Conceptual Dependency: A Theory of Natural Language Understanding,Cognitive Psychology. 3(4) 552–631.Google Scholar
  11. Tonfoni, G. (1996). Communication Patterns and Textual Forms. Intellect Books UK.Google Scholar
  12. Wilensky, R. (1983). Planning and Understanding. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Ma.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Studi Linguistici e OrientaliUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly
  2. 2.College Library and Information ServicesUniversity of MarylandCollege Park

Personalised recommendations