Effect of the specific surface of platinized aluminum silicate on the conversion of nonane

Communication 1. Change in the catalytic activity of platinized aluminum silicate on treatment of the carrier with hydrogen
  • Kh. M. Minachev
  • N. I. Shulkin
  • M. A. Markov
Article
Received:
  • 17 Downloads

Summary

  1. 1.

    An investigation was made of the catalytic properties of a series of platinum-aluminum silicate catalysts containing 1% of platinum in the transformations of nonane at 360°, 400°, and 440° under a hydrogen pressure of 20 arm in a flow system as a function of the specific surfaces of the catalysts.

     
  2. 2.

    Under the given conditions the nonane underwent various complex transformations, and the character and extent of these transformations were to a considerable extent determined by the temperature of the experiment and the specific surface of the catalyst.

     
  3. 3.

    Reduction in the specific surface of the catalyst led to reduction in hydrocracking power. This made it possible to carry out the transformations of nonane at higher temperatures, which favored higher yields of isomeric C9 paraffins. Also, rise in temperature favored increased yield of aromatic hydrocarbons.

     
  4. 4.

    Withacatalyst of specific surface 30 sq. m/g at 440°, 31% of isomeric C9 paraffins and more than 10% of aromatic hydrocarbons could be obtained.

     

Keywords

Hydrogen Aluminum Silicate Platinum Hydrocarbon 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. 1.
    Kh. M. Minachev, N. I. Shuikin, L. M. Feofanova, and Yu. P. Egotov, Izvest. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Otdel. Khim. Nauk 1218 (1957).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. A. Dzis'ko, A. A. Vishnevskaya, and V. S. Chesalova, Zhur. Fiz. Khim.24, 1416 (1950).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. K. Boreskov, V. A. Dzis'ko, M. S. Borisova, and V. N. Krasnopol'skaya, Zhur. Fiz. Khim.26, 492 (1952).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. R. Dobychin and T. F. Tselinskaya, Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR109, 2, 351 (1956).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. B. Maxted, K. L. Moon, and E. Overgage, Discussions Faraday Soc. No. 8, 1939 (1952).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. M. Rubinshtein and V. V. Afanas'ev, Izvest. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Otdel. Khim. Nauk 1294 (1956).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Landa and J. Mostecky, Collection Czechoslov. Chem. Commun.2, 20 (1955).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. D. Obolentsev, Physical Constants of Hydrocarbons of Liquid Fuels and Oils [in Russian] (Gostoptekhizdat, Moscow, 1953) p. 26.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Consultants Bureau Enterprises, Inc. 1961

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kh. M. Minachev
    • 1
  • N. I. Shulkin
    • 1
  • M. A. Markov
    • 1
  1. 1.N. D. Zelinskii Institute of Organic ChemistryAcademy of Sciences of the USSRUSSR

Personalised recommendations