Acta Informatica

, Volume 28, Issue 7, pp 681–692 | Cite as

Priority systems with many identical processes

  • Hsu-Chun Yen
Article

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the termination problem for systems with an arbitrary number of identical priority finite-state processes. In our model, the number of finite-state processes involved in the computation is arbitrary, and a priority is assigned to each transition of a process to indicate the degree of importance or urgency. We show that the termination problem is undecidable for such systems, even when the underlying interprocess communication structure is a star. The undecidability result holds for systems with acyclic processes as well. However, if we require that no two processes reside in the same state (except the starting state) during the course of the computation, the termination problem is PSPACE-complete. Finally, we show that if the priority relation is empty, the problem becomes PTIME-complete.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Clarke, E., Emerson, E., Sistla, A.: Automatic verification of finite state concurrent programs from temporal specifications. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Systems8, 244–263 (1986)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clarke, E., Grumberg, O., Browne, M.: Reasoning about networks with many identical finite-state processes. Proceedings of 5th ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, pp. 240–248, 1986Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garg, V.: Analysis of distributed systems with many identical processes. IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, pp. 358–365, 1988Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gouda, M., Rosier, L.: Priority networks of communicating finite state machines. SIAM J. Comput.14, 157–166 (1985)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jones, N., Laaser, W.: Complete problems for deterministic polynomial time. Theoret. Comput. Sci.3, 105–117 (1977)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kozen, D.: Lower bounds for natural proof systems. Proceedings 18th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 254–266, 1977Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lichtenstein, O., Pnueli, A.: Checking that finite state concurrent programs satisfy their linear specification. Proceedings of the 12th Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pp. 97–107, 1985Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Manna, Z., Pnueli, A.: Specification and verification of concurrent programs by ∀-automata. Proceedings of 13th ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pp. 1–12, 1987Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Minsky, M.: Computation: Finite and infinite machines. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall 1967Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rosier, L., Yen, H.: On the complexity of deciding fair termination of probabilistic concurrent finite-state programs. Theoret. Comput. Sci.58, 263–324 (1988)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sistla, A., German, S.: Reasoning with many processes. Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, pp. 138–152, 1987Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vardi, M.: Automatic verification of probabilistic concurrent finite-state programs. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 327–338, 1985Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hsu-Chun Yen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan, Republic of China

Personalised recommendations