Aerodynamic interactions of two airfoils in unsteady motion
- 155 Downloads
Aerodynamic interactions of two airfoils in tandem configuration moving parallelly forward and down at large angle of attack after an initial acceleration from rest are studied, using the method of solving the Navier-Stokes equations in moving overset grids. In the early time of the motion, force coefficients on the fore- and hind-airfoils are almost the same and are both enhanced in comparison with that of the single airfoil. The mechanism for the enhancement is that each airfoil sees a faster incoming flow because of the ‘blockage’ effect caused by the presence of the other airfoil. After the early time, for the cases having only horizontal spacing,CL on the fore-airfoil keeps to be larger than that of the single airfoil, and the smaller the spacing is, the larger theCL is;CL on the hind-airfoil rapidly decreases to a lower level because of the interaction between the starting vortex of the fore-airfoil and the dynamic stall vortex of the hind-airfoil, and this detrimental effect becomes more severe as the spacing becomes smaller.Cd behaves similarly. When the hind-airfoil is lower in vertical position than the fore-airfoil and their horizontal spacing is small (e.g. the vertical and horizontal spacings are 0.25c), large enhancement of the forces on the fore-airfoil (e.g.CL=3.0) and a noticeable enhancement on the hind-airfoil (e.g.CL≈2.2) can be obtained.
KeywordsVortex Dynamical System Fluid Dynamics Detrimental Effect Early Time
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Alexander, D. E.: Unusual phase relationships between the forewings and hindwings in flying dragon-flies. J. Exp. Biol.109, 379–383 (1984).Google Scholar
- Norberg, R. A.: Hovering flight of the dragonfly Aeschna juncea L., kinematics and aerodynamics. In: Swimming and flying in nature (Wu, T.Y., Brokaw, C. J., Brennen, C., eds.) pp. 763–781. New York: Plenum Press 1975.Google Scholar
- Wakeling, J. M., Ellington, C. P.: Dragonfly flight, II. Velocities, accelerations and kinematics of flapping flight. J. Exp. Biol.200, 557–582 (1997).Google Scholar
- Weis-Fogh, T.: Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals, including novel mechanisms for lift production. J. Exp. Biol.59, 169–230 (1973).Google Scholar
- Somps, C., Luttges, M.: Dragonfly flight: novel uses of unsteady separation flows. Science28, 1326–1328 (1985).Google Scholar
- Lan, S. L., Sun, M.: Aerodynamic properties of a wing performing unsteady rotational motions at small Reynolds number. Acta Mech. (forthcoming).Google Scholar
- Rogers, S. E., Kwak, D., Kiris, C.: Numerical solution of the incompressible Navier-Strokes equations for steady-state and time-dependent problems. AIAA J.29, 603–610 (1991).Google Scholar
- Meakin, R.: Moving body overset grid methods for complete aircraft tiltrotor simulations. AIAA Paper 93-3350 (1993).Google Scholar
- Hilgenstock, A.: A fast method for the elliptic generation of three dimensional grids with full boundary control. In: Numerical grid generation in CFM '88, pp. 137–146 Pineridge Press 1988.Google Scholar