Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 459–474 | Cite as

The structure of loneliness: A factor-analytic investigation

  • Brian J. Cuffel
  • T. John Akamatsu
Article

Abstract

To examine the question “What is loneliness?” and to examine the role of quantitative aspects of social relationships in loneliness, UCLA Loneliness Scale scores were factor-analyzed along with a broad range of social network variables assessing the satisfaction, frequency of contact, and number of relationships in four categories of social relationships: casual, close, romantic, and family. Subjects' comparisons of their current relationships to past relationships and to peers' relationships were also entered. The analysis indicated that the UCLA Loneliness Scale loaded only on the first factor, along with reported satisfaction with casual and close relationships and judgments that current relationships were better than in the past and were better than those of one's peers. Quantitative variables loaded on factors accounting for relatively little variance and were orthogonal to the factor most highly associated with loneliness. The results emphasize the relative importance of subjective judgments about adequacy of social relationships in accounting for loneliness.

Key words

loneliness factor analysis social self-esteem social network 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cutrona, C. E. (1982). Transition to college: Loneliness and the process of social adjustment. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.),Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research, and therapy (pp. 291–309). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Cutrona, C. E. (1986). Behavioral manifestations of social support: A microanalytic investigation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49 201–208.Google Scholar
  3. Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1974). Short forms of the Texas Social Behavior Inventory (TSBI), and objective measure of self-esteem.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 4 473–475.Google Scholar
  5. Jones, W. H. (1981). Loneliness and social contact.Journal of Social Psychology, 113 295–296.Google Scholar
  6. Jones, W. H. (1982). Loneliness and social behavior. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.),Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research, and therapy (pp. 238–252). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Jones, W. H., Carpenter, B. N., & Quintanna, D. (1985). Personality and interpersonal predictors of loneliness in two cultures.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 1503–1511.Google Scholar
  8. McCormack, S. H., & Kahn, A. (1980, May).Behavioral characteristics of lonely and nonlonely college students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, St. Louis, Missouri.Google Scholar
  9. Peplau, L. A., & Perlman, D. (1982). Perspectives on loneliness. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.),Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research, and therapy (pp. 1–16). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Perlman, D., & Peplau, L. A. (1984). Loneliness research: A survey of empirical findings. In L. A. Peplau & S. E. Goldston (Eds.),Preventing the harmful consequences of severe and persistent loneliness (pp. 13–46) (DHHS Publication No. ADM 84-1312). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  11. Russell, D. W. (1982). Developing a measure of loneliness. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.),Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research, and therapy (pp. 81–104). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Russell, D. W., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39 472–480.Google Scholar
  13. Russell, D. W., Peplau, L. A., & Ferguson, M. L. (1978). Developing a measure of loneliness.Journal of Personality Assessment, 42 290–294.Google Scholar
  14. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Version 5. (1985). Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Stokes, J. P. (1985). The relation of social network and individual difference variables to loneliness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 981–990.Google Scholar
  16. Wheeler, L., Reis, H., & Nezlek, J. (1983). Loneliness, social interaction and sex roles.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 943–945.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian J. Cuffel
    • 1
  • T. John Akamatsu
    • 1
  1. 1.Kent State UniversityKentUSA

Personalised recommendations