Advertisement

Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 319–338 | Cite as

Self-efficacy, outcome, and attrition in a weight-reduction program

  • Michel Bernier
  • Jacqueline Avard
Article

Abstract

The utility and validity of Bandura's self-efficacy construct was evaluated in a study involving 62 volunteer overweight women. Pretreatment, posttreatment, and follow-up assessments of self-efficacy and weight loss were obtained in the context of a behaviorally oriented weight-reduction program. It was predicted that (a) weight loss would be related to enhancement in personal efficacy, (b) posttreatment efficacy would be a significant and more accurate predictor of weight loss during follow-up intervals than posttreatment weight loss, and (c) self-efficacy would be related to attrition whereas weight loss would not. Results indicate a significant relationship between weight change and personal efficacy during the follow-up intervals. In accord with Bandura's theory, efficacy expectations predicted outcome during the 6-week and 6-month follow-up intervals, whereas posttreatment weight loss was unrelated to later outcome. In addition, completers had a substantially higher level of personal efficacy than dropouts over treatment and, to a lesser extent, over the follow-up period. Some procedural considerations regarding the assessment of personal efficacy are raised, and the relationship between the cognitively based constructs of goal choice and self-efficacy and task performance are discussed. Finally, given the nature and variability of weight-reduction efforts and the overall time span of the study, it is concluded that results attest to the validity and utility of the self-efficacy construct in predicting behavioral persistence and level of behavioral change.

Key words

self-efficacy weight reduction attrition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change.Psychological Review, 84 191–215.Google Scholar
  2. Bandrua, A. (1982a). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency.American Psychologist, 37 122–147.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1982b). The self and mechanisms of agency. In J. Suls (Ed.),Psychological perspectives on the self. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A., & Adams, N. E. (1977). Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavior change.Cognitive Therapy and Research 1 287–308.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A., Adams, N. E., Hardy, A. B., & Howells, G. N. (1980). Tests of the generality of self-efficacy theory.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 4 39–66.Google Scholar
  6. Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41 586–598.Google Scholar
  7. Condiotte, M. M., & Lichtenstein, E. (1981). Self-efficacy and relapse in smoking cessation programs.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49 648–658.Google Scholar
  8. Cumings, C., Gordon, J. R., & Marlatt, G. A. (1980). Relapse: Prevention and prediction. In W. R. Miller (Ed.),The addictive behaviors (pp. 291–322). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  9. Di Clemente, C. C. (1981). Self-efficacy and smoking cessation maintenance.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 5 175–187.Google Scholar
  10. Hagen, R. L. (1974). Group therapy versus bibliotherapy in weight reduction.Behavior Therapy, 5 222–234.Google Scholar
  11. Hagen, R. L., Foreyt, J. P., & Durham, T. W. (1976). The drop-out problem: Reducing attrition in obesity research.Behavior Therapy, 7 463–471.Google Scholar
  12. Locke, E. A., Frederick, E., Lee, C., & Bobko, P. (1984). Effects of self-efficacy, goals and task strategies on task performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 69 241–251.Google Scholar
  13. Locke, E. A., Shaw, K. N., Saari, L. M., & Latham, G. P. (1981). Goal-setting and task performance: 1969–1980.Psychological Bulletin, 90 125–152.Google Scholar
  14. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, New York. (1959). New weight standards for men and women.Statistical Bulletin, 40 1–4.Google Scholar
  15. Rodin, J. (1978).Cognitive behavior therapy: A practitioners guide. New York: B.M.A. Audio Casette Publication.Google Scholar
  16. Taylor, B. C., Ferguson, J. M., & Reading, T. C. (1978). Gradual weight loss and depression.Behavior Therapy, 9 622–625.Google Scholar
  17. Wilson, G. T. (1978). Methodological considerations in treatment outcome research in obesity.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46 687–702.Google Scholar
  18. Wilson, G. T., & Brownell, K. D. (1980). Behavior therapy for obesity. An evaluation of treatment outcome.Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 3 49–86.Google Scholar
  19. Wing, R. R., Epstein, L. H., & Shapira, B. (1982). The effect of increasing initial weight loss in the Scarsdale Diet on subsequent weight loss in a behavioral treatment program.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50 446–447.Google Scholar
  20. Wollersheim, J. P. (1970). Effectiveness of a group therapy based on learning principles in treatment of overweight women.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 76 462–474.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michel Bernier
    • 1
  • Jacqueline Avard
    • 1
  1. 1.Département de PsychologieUniversité de MontréalMontréal QuébecCanada

Personalised recommendations