Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 93–97 | Cite as

Self-control behaviors and coping with seasickness

  • Michael Rosenbaum
  • Arnon Rolnick


The study examined the relations between subjects' general repertoire of self-control behaviors and their ability to cope with seasickness. Based on peer evaluations, sailors of the Israeli Navy were divided into “seasick” and “not seasick” groups. Each of these groups was further divided into high self-controllers (HSC) and low self-controllers (LSC) on the basis of their scores on Rosenbaum's Self-Control Schedule. Performance deficits as a consequence of a stormy sea were assessed by a peer evaluation technique. As expected, (a) HSC seasick subjects had fewer performance deficits than LSC seasick subjects, and (b) HSC seasick subjects reported using more extensively self-control methods to cope with seasickness than did LSC seasick subjects. These differences were not observed between HSC subjects and LSC subjects in the not-seasick group. HSC subjects did not differ from LSC subjects in their susceptibility to seasickness. These findings highlight the importance of cognitive skills in the process of coping with physically stressful situations.


Cognitive Psychology Stressful Situation Cognitive Skill Evaluation Technique Performance Deficit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference Note

  1. Gal, R.Coping processes under seasickness conditions. Unpublished manuscript, University of California at Berkeley, 1974.Google Scholar


  1. Gal, R. Assessment of seasickness and its consequences by a method of peer evaluation.Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 1975,46 836–839.Google Scholar
  2. Goldfried, M. R. Psychotherapy as coping skills training. In M. J. Mahoney (Ed.),Psychotherapy process: Current issues and future directions. New York: Plenum Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  3. Meichenbaum, D.Cognitive-behavior modification: An integrative approach. New York: Plenum Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  4. Money, K. E. Motion sickness.Physiological Review 1970,50 1–39.Google Scholar
  5. Reason, J. T.Man in motion: The psychology of travel. London: Weindenfeld & Nicolson, 1974.Google Scholar
  6. Rosenbaum, M. A schedule for assessing self-control behaviors: Preliminary findings.Behavior Therapy 1980,11 109–121. (a)Google Scholar
  7. Rosenbaum, M. Individual differences in self-control behaviors and tolerance of painful stimulation.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1980,89 581–590. (b)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Rosenbaum
    • 1
  • Arnon Rolnick
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyTel-Aviv University and The Schwartz Research CenterTel-AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations