Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 247–261 | Cite as

Effects of envisioning future activities on self-efficacy judgments and motivation: An availability heuristic interpretation

  • Daniel Cervone


This study examines the effects of envisioning factors that can either facilitate or hinder performance on an upcoming activity. Prior to engaging in a cognitive task, subjects focused on factors that could enhance or impair their performance. They then indicated their perceived self-efficacy on the activity and performed the task. Dwelling on factors that could impair performance diminished judgments of self-efficacy. Group differences in subsequent task persistence paralleled the differences in self-efficacy judgments. Regression analyses provided evidence that judgments of self-efficacy mediated the behavioral effects. Subjects displayed nearly identical levels of performance motivation whether or not they recorded self-efficacy judgments. The results are interpreted in terms of the availability heuristic. Self-efficacy judgments generally may reflect a small set of highly available personal and situational factors; focusing on particular aspects of an activity heightens the availability of these features, biasing efficacy judgments, which, in turn, regulate subsequent behavior.

Key words

self-efficacy availability judgment under uncertainty motivation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, C. A. (1983). Imagination and expectation: The effects of imagining behavioral scripts on personal intentions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 293–305.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, J. W., & Birch, D. (1970).The dynamics of action. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review, 84 191–215.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. )1982). The assessment and predictive generality of self-percepts of efficacy.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 13 195–199.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1988). Reflections on nonability determinants of competence. In J. Kolligian, Jr. & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.),Competence considered: Perceptions of competence and incompetence across the lifespan. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bandura, A., & Cervone, D., (1983). Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 1017–1028.Google Scholar
  8. Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1986). Differential engagement of self-reactive influences in cognitive motivation.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38 92–113.Google Scholar
  9. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 1173–1182.Google Scholar
  10. Betz, N. E., & Hackett, G. (1981). The relationship of career-related self-efficacy expectations to perceived career options in college men and women.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28 399–410.Google Scholar
  11. Betz, N. E., & Hackett, G. (1986). Applications of self-efficacy theory to understanding career choice behavior.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4 279–289.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, I., Jr., & Inouye, D. K. (1978). Learned helplessness through modeling: The role of perceived similarity in competence.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36 900–908.Google Scholar
  13. Campbell, J. D., & Fairey, P. J. (1985). Effects of self-esteem, hypothetical explanations, and verbalization of expectancies on future performance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 1097–1111.Google Scholar
  14. Carroll, J. S. (1978). The effect of imagining an event on expectations for the event: An interpretation in terms of the availability heuristic.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14 88–96.Google Scholar
  15. Cervone, D., & Peake, P. K. (1986). Anchoring, efficacy, and action: The influence of judgmental heuristics on self-efficacy judgments and behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50 492–501.Google Scholar
  16. Chatterjee, S., & Price, B. (1977).Regression analysis by example. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 5–12.Google Scholar
  18. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data.Psychological Review, 87 215–251.Google Scholar
  19. Feather, N. T. (1961). The relationship of persistence at a task to expectation of success and achievement-related motives.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63 552–561.Google Scholar
  20. Gregory, W. L., Cialdini, R. B., & Carpenter, K. M. (1982). Self-relevant scenarios as mediators of likelihood estimates and compliance: Does imagining make it so?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43 89–99.Google Scholar
  21. Hersen, M., Kazdin, A. E., Bellack, A. S., & Turner, S. M. (1979). Effects of live modeling, covert modeling, and rehearsal on assertiveness in psychiatric patients.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 17 369–377.Google Scholar
  22. Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1981). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations.Evaluation Review, 5 602–619.Google Scholar
  23. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982).Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. O'Leary, A. (1985). Self-efficacy and health.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23 437–451.Google Scholar
  25. Peake, P. K., & Cervone, D. (1989). Sequence anchoring and self-efficacy: Primacy effects in the consideration of possibilities.Social Cognition, 7 31–50.Google Scholar
  26. Quattrone, G. A. (1985). On the congruity between internal states and action.Psychological Bulletin, 98 3–40.Google Scholar
  27. Ross, L., Lepper, M., Strack, F., & Steinmetz, J. (1977). Social explanation and social expectation: Effects of real and hypothetical explanations on subjective likelihood.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35 817–829.Google Scholar
  28. Schunk, D. (1984). Self-efficacy perspective on achievement behavior.Educational Psychologist, 19 48–58.Google Scholar
  29. Sherman, S. J., Skov, R. B., Hervitz, E. F., & Stock, C. B. (1981). The effects of explaning hypothetical future events: From possibility to probability to actuality and beyond.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17 142–158.Google Scholar
  30. Strecher, V. J., DeVellis, B. M., Becker, M. H., & Rosenstock, I. M. (1986). The role of self-efficacy in achieving health behavior change.Health Education Quarterly, 13 73–91.Google Scholar
  31. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability.Cognitive Psychology, 5 207–232.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Cervone
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations