Corrosion of silicate glasses by alkaline solutions Communication 2. Relation between the stability of glasses to alkali and their compositions
- 50 Downloads
Summary
- 1.
The alkali -stabilities of glasses of the type (87 -−x)%SiO2, −x%RO, 13%Na2O (R is Be, Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba, Zn, Cd, or Pb), binary sodium silicate glasses containing 13–33 moles %Na2O, and titanium-containing flint glasses were determined by measuring the thickness of the dissolved layer interferometrically.
- 2.
It was shown that, with the exception of beryllium oxide, all oxides introduced into the binary glass in place of silica lower the alkali-stability of the glass. At first (up to 22 % RO), the lowering is only slight and the glasses differ little in alkali-stability. When the amount of silica replaced by metal oxide is higher than this, there is a considerable fall in stability; this fall is the greater, the greater the ionic radius of the metal introduced (ionic-radius rule).
- 3.
For sodium oxide contents of up to 20 moles percent, binary sodium silicate glasses are fairly stable. Titanium affects stability to alkali in the same way as lead.
Keywords
Oxide Titanium SiO2 Metal Oxide Ionic RadiusPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literature cited
- [1]V. S. Molchanov and O. S. Molchanov, Trans. State Optical Inst. No. 146, 1956.Google Scholar
- [2]R. Pike and D. Hubbard, J. Res. Nat. Bur., Stand. 50, No. 2, 87 (1953).Google Scholar
- [3]V. S. Molchanov and N. E. Prikhid'ko, Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR, Div. Chem. Sci. 1957, 1151.Google Scholar
- [4]S. K. Dubrovo and Iu. A. Shmidt, Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR, Div. Chem. Sci. 1955, 403.Google Scholar
- [5]A. G. Betekht, Mineralogy, State Geol. Press, Moscow, 1950.Google Scholar
- [6]O. K. Botvinkin and B. V. Tarasov, Glass and Ceramics, No. 7, 7 (1954).Google Scholar
- [7]German Patent 710079, abstracted in Glas. Techn. Ber. 19, 402 (1941).Google Scholar
- [8]I. I. Kitaigorodskif and L. S. Lande, in the Collection “Effect of Composition on the Physicochemical Properties of Glasses,” Trans, State Glass Inst., Moscow, 1954, p, 27.Google Scholar
- [9]I. Sawai and H. Usidima, abstracted in Glas. Techn. Ber. 20, 235 (1942).Google Scholar
- [10]M. A. Bezborodov and I. I. Kisel', Proc. Acad. Sci. USSR, 103, 1073 (1955).Google Scholar
- [11]M. G. Chemiak, Effect of Composition on the Physicochemical Properties of Glass, Trans. State Glass Inst., Moscow, 1934, p. 64.Google Scholar
- [12]M. A. Bezborodov, J. Soc. Glas. Techn. 28, 113 (1944).Google Scholar
- [13]E. Hamilton, O. Grauer, Z. Zabawsky and C. Hahner, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 31, No. 5, 132 (1948).Google Scholar
- [14]W. Turner and V. Dimbleby, J. Soc. Glas. Techn., 10, 304 (1926); 12, 52 (1928).Google Scholar
- [15]H. Wessel, Silikattechnik 3, No. 11, 483 (1952).Google Scholar
- [16]R. L. Miuller and Ts. V. Vainshtein, J. Phys. Chem. 7, No. 3, 364 (1936).Google Scholar