Effects of surface preparation on the friction and wear behaviour of silicon nitride/silicon carbide sliding pairs
- 95 Downloads
Silicon carbide and silicon nitride specimens were fabricated to provide three different surface finishes. They were subjected to sphere-on-flat (pin-on-disc) testing in order to determine the interaction of load, velocity, disc surface finish, and material effects on unlubricated friction and wear. Tests were conducted in air using applied loads of 1 and 10N, velocities of 0.1 and 0.5 ms−1, and surface preparations of 150-grit grinding, 220-grit grinding and fine polishing. The test duration was kept constant at 1000m of sliding distance for the pin specimen. In half the tests silicon nitride was the pin material and silicon carbide was the disc material. For the other half, the pin and slider materials were reversed. There was a much greater effect of normal force on steady-state friction coefficient than of either surface finish or material pairing. Increasing the sliding velocity raised the friction coefficient for both material pairings and for all surface roughnesses. Higher wear resulted when the velocity increased, but the effect of surface finish on wear ranged from none in some cases to about a factor of 10 in other cases. A trend of increasing run-in period duration with increasing smoothness was observed. The results are interpreted in terms of material properties, the Lim and Ashby model, and the friction force-velocity product.
KeywordsFriction Coefficient Silicon Carbide Silicon Nitride Surface Finish Disc Surface
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.P. J. Blau, “Friction and wear transitions of materials” (Noyes, Park Ridge, New Jersey, 1989).Google Scholar
- 2.J. I. McCool,Wear 107 (1986) 37.Google Scholar
- 3.Idem, in “Mechanics of coatings”, edited by D. Dowson, C. M. Taylor, and M. Godet (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990) p. 157.Google Scholar
- 4.P. J. Blau,Wear 151 (1991) 193.Google Scholar
- 5.H. Czichos, S. Becker andJ. Lexow,ibid. 114 (1987) 109.Google Scholar
- 6.T. E. Fischer andH. Tomizawa, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Wear of Materials, Vancouver, Canada, April 14–18, 1985 (ASME, New York, 1985) p. 22.Google Scholar
- 7.N. Wallbridge, D. Dowson andE. W. Roberts, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Wear of Materials, Reston, Virginia, April 11–14, 1983 (ASME, New York, 1983) p. 202.Google Scholar
- 8.P. J. Blau, in “Detection, diagnosis and prognosis of rotating machinery”, edited by Shives and Mertaugh (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988) p. 61.Google Scholar
- 9.E. J. Bengtsson andA. Ronneberg,Wear 109 (1986) 329.Google Scholar
- 10.D. S. Lim andM. F. Ashby,Acta Metall. 35 (1987) 1.Google Scholar
- 11.W. J. Lackey, D. P. Stinton, G. A. Cerny, L. L. Fehrenbacher andA. C. Schaffhauser, in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Ceramic Components for Heat Engines, Hakone, Japan, October 17–19, 1983, edited by S. Somiya, E. Kanai and K. Ando (KTK Scientific Publishers, Tokyo) p. 770.Google Scholar