Advertisement

International Journal of Fracture

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 141–154 | Cite as

An experimental investigation into dynamic fracture: III. On steady-state crack propagation and crack branching

  • K. Ravi-Chandar
  • W. G. Knauss
Article

Abstract

This is the third in a series of four papers in which problems of dynamic crack propagation are examined experimentally in large, thin sheets of Homalite-100 such that crack growth in an unbounded plate is simulated. In the first paper crack initiation resulting from stress wave loading to the crack tip as well as crack arrest were reported. It was found that for increasing rates of loading in the microsecond range the stress intensity required for initiation rises markedly. Crack arrest occurs abruptly without any deceleration phase at a stress intensity lower than that which causes initiation under quasi-static loading.

In the second paper we analyze the occurrence of micro cracks at the front of the running main crack which control the rate of crack growth. The micro cracks are recorded by real time photography. By the same means it is shown that these micro cracks grow and turn away smoothly from the direction of the main crack in the process of branching.

In the present paper we report results on crack propagation and branching. It is found that crack propagation occurs at a constant velocity although the stress intensity factor changes markedly. Furthermore, the velocity is determined by the stress wave induced intensity factor at initiation. The terminal velocity in Homalite-100 was found to be about half the Rayleigh wave speed (0.45 C r ). These observations are analyzed in terms of a microcrack model alluded to in the second paper of this series. A mechanism for crack branching is proposed which considers branching to be a natural evolution from a “cloud” of microcracks that accompany and lead the main crack. These results are believed to apply to quasi-brittle materials other than Homalite-100 and the reasons for this belief are discussed briefly in the first paper of this series.

In the final paper of the series the effect of stress waves impinging on the tip of a rapidly moving crack is examined. Waves affect the velocity and the direction of propagation as well as the process of crack branching.

Keywords

Stress Intensity Intensity Factor Stress Intensity Factor Crack Initiation Rayleigh Wave 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    K. Ravi-Chandar and W.G. Knauss,International Journal of Fracture 25 (1984) 247–262.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    K. Ravi-Chandar and W.G. Knauss,International Journal of Fracture 26 (1984) 65–80.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    K. Ravi-Chandar and W.G. Knauss,International Journal of Fracture 26 (1984) to appear.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    K. Ravi-Chandar and W.G. Knauss,International Journal of Fracture 20 (1982) 209–222.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    J.W. Dally,Experimental Mechanics 19 (1979) 349–361.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    L.B. Freund,Journal of Elasticity 4 (1972) 341–349.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    L.R.F. Rose,International Journal of Fracture 12 (1976) 799–813.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    H. Schardin, inFracture (ed. Averbach et al.) MIT Press and John Wiley (1959) 297–330.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    J. Field,Contemporary Physics 12 (1971) 1–31.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    W.M. Beebe, Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology (1966).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    V. Finkel et al.,Fizika Metallov Metallovedhennie 15 (1963) 754–764.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    J.D. Achenbach,International Journal of Solids and Structures 11 (1975) 1301–1314.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    P. Burgers and J.P. Dempsey,Journal of Applied Mechanics 49 (1982) 366–370.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    P. Burgers,Proceedings, NSF Workshop on Dynamic Fracture, California Institute of Technology, February 1983.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    E. Yoffe,Philosophical Magazine 12 (1951) 739–750.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    B.R. Baker,Journal of Applied Mechanics 29 (1962) 449–458.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    J.D. Eshelby, inInelastic Behaviour of Solids (eds. M.F. Kanninen et al.) McGraw Hill, New York (1970) 111.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    B.R. Lawn and T.R. Wilshaw,Fracture in Brittle Solids, Cambridge University Press (1975) 104.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Congleton et al.,Philosophical Magazine 16 (1967) 749–760.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    T.A. Pucik, Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology (1972).Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Yokobori et al.,Reports of The Research Institute for Strength and Fracture of Materials, Tohoku University, Vol. 7, No. 1 (1971) 25–47.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Ravi-Chandar
    • 1
  • W. G. Knauss
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate Aeronautical LaboratoriesCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA

Personalised recommendations