Reactive changes of live nerve endings in a culture of isolated glia-deprived neurons

Arshavskii, Yu. I., M. B. Berkinblit, and B. I. Khodorov, Functional Properties of the Nerve Cell and Its Parts. General and Specialized Physiology of the Nervous System. Handbook on Physiology [in Russian], Leningrad (1969), pp. 37–72.Google Scholar

Astakhova, V. V., “On the state of the nervous apparatus of the wall of the major veins in cats in experimental fever,” Candidate's Thesis, Leningrad (1957).Google Scholar

Barer, R., “Refractometry and interferometry of living cells,” J. Opt. Soc. Am.,47, 545 (1957).Google Scholar

Bocharova, L. S., M. A. Kostenko, B. N. Veprinzev, and B. L. Allachverdov, “Completely isolated molluscan neurons. An ultrastructural study,” Brain Res.,101, No. 2, 185–198 (1976).Google Scholar

Cajal, S., Degeneration and Regeneration of the Nervous System, London (1928).Google Scholar

Crain, S. M., Neurophysiologic Studies in Tissue Culture, Raven Press, New York (1976).Google Scholar

Doinikov, B. S., General Histology and Histopathology of the Peripheral Somatic Nervous System. Selected Works on Neuromorphology and Neuropathology [in Russian], Medgiz, Moscow (1955a), pp. 224–275.Google Scholar

Doinikov, B. S., On Degenerative and Regenerative Phenomena in Neuraxes in Multiple Sclerosis. Selected Works on Neuromorphology and Neuropathology [in Russian], Medgiz, Moscow (1955b), pp. 88–111.Google Scholar

Geletyuk, V. I., “Growth of axons and the formation of functional nervous connectionsin vitro of totally isolated neurons of the adultLymnaea stagnalis,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,233 No. 5, 289–292 (1977).Google Scholar

Hyden, H., “Biochemical and functional relationships between neuron and glia,” in: Genetic Apparatus of the Cell and Some Aspects of Ontogenesis [Russian translation], Moscow (1968), pp. 116–139.Google Scholar

Hyden, H., S. Lövtrup, and A. Pigon, “Cytochrome oxidase and succinoxidase activities in spinal ganglion cells and in glial capsule cells,” J. Neurochem.,2, No. 4, 304–311 (1958).Google Scholar

Israilov, B. I., and O. S. Sotnikov, “An analysis of different types of reactive changes of nerve fibers,” Byull. Eksp. Biol. Med.,83, No. 2, 241–244 (1977).Google Scholar

Khodorov, B. I., General Physiology of Excitable Membranes. Handbook on Physiology [in Russian], Moscow (1975).Google Scholar

Konovalov, G. V., S. N. Olenev, E. I. Chumasov, and O. A. Rodshtein, Nerve Tissue Culture [in Russian], Moscow (1977), p. 184.Google Scholar

Kostenko, M. A., V. I. Geletyuk, and B. N. Veprinzev, “Completely isolated neurons in the molluscLymnaea stagnalis. A new objective for nerve cell biology investigation,” Comp. Biochem. Physiol.,49A, 89–100 (1976).Google Scholar

Lawrentjew, B. I., and A. J. Borowskaja, “Die Degeneration der postganglionaren Fasern des autonomen Nervensystems and deren Endigungen,” Z. Zellforsch.,23, 761–778 (1936).Google Scholar

Levin, S. V., Structural Changes of Cell Membranes [in Russian], Nauka, Leningrad (1976).Google Scholar

Levin, S. V., and D. L. Rozental', “On the structural changes occurring during the stimulation of nerve fibers,” in: Mechanisms of Cell Permeability, Excitation, and Injury [in Russian], Leningrad (1969), pp. 148–172.Google Scholar

Lodin, Z., G. Hartmann, M. P. Kage, P. Korinkova, and J. Bocher, “Potassium-induced hydration in cultured neuronal tissue,” J. Neurobiol. No. 1, 69–85 (1971).Google Scholar

Mairov, V. N., Morphology of Reactive States of the Vegetative Interneuronal Synapse [in Russian], Nauka, Leningrad (1969).Google Scholar

Olenev, S. N., The Developing Brain [in Russian], Nauka, Leningrad (1978).Google Scholar

Pomerat, S. M., W. I. Hendelman, C. W. Raiborn, and I. F. Massey, “Dynamic activities of nervous tissuein vitro,” in: The Neuron, Elsevier, Amsterdam-London-New York (1967), pp. 119–178.Google Scholar

Sotnikov, O. S., Functional Morphology of the Living Pulpy Nerve Fiber [in Russian], Nauka, Leningrad (1976).Google Scholar

Sotnikov, O. S., “Problems of neuronal-glial relationships,” Arkh. Anat.,72, No. 6, 97–99 (1977).Google Scholar

Sotnikov, O. S., “A procedure for a vital microscopic study of a peripheral neuron and interneuronal synapse,” in: Vital Microscopy of Neurons [in Russian], Chapter 4, Leningrad (1978). pp. 45–57.Google Scholar

Sotnikov, O. S., and Z. F. Shavlaev, “In vivo changes of pulpy nerve fibers for the action of novocaine,” Éksp. Khir.,14, No. 2, 66–70 (1969).Google Scholar

Speidel, C. C., “The experimental induction of visible structural changes in single nerve fibers in living frog tadpoles,” Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.,4 13–17 (1936).Google Scholar

Speidel, C. C., “Changes in nerve fibers during alcoholic intoxication and recovery,” Sci. Month.,44, 178–185 (1937).Google Scholar

Tret'yak, N. N., and M. A. Kostenko, “Dependence of RNA synthesis and the formation of processes in isolated neurons of pulmonate mollusks in culture on the ionic composition and osmotic strength of the nutrient medium,” Tsitologiya,20, No. 6, 643–650 (1978).Google Scholar

Van der Loos, H., “Autapses in neocortex cerebri,” Brain Res.,48, 355–360 (1972).Google Scholar

Veprintsev, B. N., V. I. Geletyuk, and M. A. Kostenko, “Cultures of nerve cells ofLymnaea stagnalis andHelix pomatia,” in: Manual on Nerve Tissue Culture [in Russian], Moscow (1976), pp. 190–202.Google Scholar

Yashin, V. A., O. S. Sotnikov, and V. N. Karnaukhov, Use of the ‘Peraval Interface’ Microscope for Studying the Structure of Living Nerve Cells [in Russian], Jena Survey (1979).Google Scholar

Young, I. Z., “Surface tension and the degeneration of nerve fibers,” Nature,154 (1944).Google Scholar

Zazybin, N. I., “Experimental analysis of some reactive properties of the peripheral nervous system,” Annot. Nauchn. Rabot Akad. Med. Nauk SSSR za 1956 g. Book 1, Moscow (1958). pp. 99–101.Google Scholar