Heavy metal and selenium levels in endangered wood storksMycteria americana from nesting colonies in Florida and Costa Rica

  • Joanna Burger
  • James A. RodgersJr.
  • Michael Gochfeld
Article

Abstract

Colonially-nesting birds often nest in coastal areas, along rivers, or near other bodies of water that also are potentially polluted from industrial, agricultural or urban development. The levels of heavy metals and selenium were examined in the feathers of young wood storksMycteria americana nesting in Northeastern Florida and from adult and young storks nesting on the Tempisque River on the west coast of Costa Rica. There were no significant yearly differences among the chicks from Costa Rica. Concentration of mercury, cadmium, and lead were significantly higher in the chicks from Florida compared to those from Costa Rica. Adult wood storks at Costa Rica had significantly higher levels of lead, cadmium, selenium, and manganese than young from the same colony.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Appelquist H, Askirk S, Draback L (1984) Mercury stability in bird feathers. Mar Pollut Bull 15:22–27Google Scholar
  2. Bancroft GT, Hoffman W, Sawick RJ, Ogden JC (1992) The importance of the water conservation areas in the Everglades to the endangered wood stork (Mycteria americana). Cons Biol 6:392–398Google Scholar
  3. Braune BM, Gaskin DE (1987a) A mercury budget for the Bonaparte's gull during autumn moult. Ornis Scan 18:244–250Google Scholar
  4. —, — (1987b) Mercury levels in Bonaparte's gull (Larus philadelphia) during autumn molt in the Quoddy region, New Brunswick, Canada. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 16:539–549Google Scholar
  5. Burger J (1993) Metals in feathers of brown noddy (Anous stolidus): evidence for bioaccumulation on mid-oceanic compared to continental areas. Environ Monit Asses (in press)Google Scholar
  6. —, Gochfeld M (1991) Cadmium and lead in common terns (Aves:Sterna hirundo): relationship between levels in parents and eggs. Environ Monit Assess 16:253–258Google Scholar
  7. —, — (1992) Trace elements distribution in growing feathers: additional excretion in feather sheaths. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 23:105–108Google Scholar
  8. —, Parsons K, Benson T, Shukla T, Rothstein D, Gochfeld M (1992) Heavy metal and selenium levels in young cattle egrets from nesting colonies in the Northeastern United States, Puerto Rico, and Egypt. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 23:435–439Google Scholar
  9. Ehrlich PR, Ehrlich A (1981) Extinction: The causes and consequences of the disappearance of species. Random House, NYGoogle Scholar
  10. Ehrlich PR, Dobkin DS, Wheye D (1988) The birder's handbook. Simon & Schuster, Inc, NYGoogle Scholar
  11. EPA (1981) Interim methods for sampling and analysis of priority pollutants in sediments and fish tissue. US Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 600/4-81-055, Cincinnati, OHGoogle Scholar
  12. Furness RW, Muirhead SJ, Woodburn M (1986) Using bird feathers to measure mercury in the environment: relationship between mercury content and moult. Mar Pollut Bull 17:27–30Google Scholar
  13. —, Lewis SA, Mills JA (1990) Mercury levels in the plumage of Red-billed gulls,Larus novaehollandiae scopulinus of known sex and age. Environ Pollut 63:33–39Google Scholar
  14. Fleming WJ, Rodgers JA Jr, Stafford CJ (1984) Contaminants in wood stork eggs and their effects on reproduction, Florida, 1982. Colonial Waterbirds 7:88–93Google Scholar
  15. Gill DE (1988) A naturalist's guide to the OTS Palo Verde Field Station. OTS, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
  16. Goede AA, deBruin M (1984) The use of bird feather parts as a monitor for metal pollution. Environ Pollut A 37:287–309Google Scholar
  17. Hahn E, Hahn K, Stoeppler M (1989a) Schwermetalie in federn von Habichen (Accipter gentalis) aus Unterschiedlich belasteten Gebieten. J Ornthol 130:303–309Google Scholar
  18. —, Hahn K, Ellenberg H (1989b) Schwermitallgenhalte in federn von elsterm (Pica pica) folge exdogener Auglagening aus der atmosphere? Verhandlungen der Geseellscfhaft fur Okologie (Essen 1988), XVIIIGoogle Scholar
  19. Hickey JJ (ed) (1969) The peregrine falcon population: Their biology and decline. Univ Wisconsin Press, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  20. —, Anderson VV (1968). Chlorinated hydrocarbons and eggshell changes in raptorial and fish-eating birds. Science 162:271–273Google Scholar
  21. Kale HW, II (1978). Rare and endangered biota of Florida. Vol 2: Birds. University Presses of Florida, GainesvilleGoogle Scholar
  22. Kushlan JA, Ogden JC, Higer AI (1974) Relation of variations in water level and fish availability to wood stork reproduction in the southern Everglades, Florida Natural Park Service and U.S. Geological Survey Report. Homestead, FLGoogle Scholar
  23. —, Frohring PC (1986) The history of the southern Florida wood stock population. Wilson Bull 98:368–386Google Scholar
  24. Lewis SA, Furness RW (1991) Mercury accumulation and excretion by laboratory reared black-headed gull (Larus ridibundus) chicks. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 21:316–320Google Scholar
  25. Ogden JC, Kushlan JA, Tilmant JT (1976) Prey selectivity by the wood stork. Condor 78:324–330Google Scholar
  26. Peakall DB, Code TC, White CM, Haugh JR (1975) Organochlorine residues in Alaskan Peregrines. Pest Monit J 8:255–260Google Scholar
  27. Phillips CR, Lenhart TE, Gregory PW (1980) Relation between trophic position and mercury accumulation among fishes from the Tongue River Reservoir. Environ Research 22:73–80Google Scholar
  28. Ratcliffe DA (1967) Decreases in eggshell weight of certain birds of prey. Nature 215:208–210Google Scholar
  29. Rapport DJ (1989) What constitutes ecosystem health? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine. 33:120–132Google Scholar
  30. Rodgers JA Jr., Wenner AS, Schwikert ST (1987) Population dynamics of wood storks in north and central Florida, USA. Colon. Waterbirds 10:151–156Google Scholar
  31. —, Rodgers JA Jr, Wenner AS, and Schwikert ST (1988) The use and function of green nest material by wood storks. Wilson Bull 100:411–423Google Scholar
  32. USDI (United States Department of the Interior) (1990) Report to congress: Endangered and threatened species recovery program. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington DC. 8p.Google Scholar
  33. Walsh PM (1990) The use of seabirds as monitors of heavy metals in the marine environment. In: Furness RW, Rainbow PS (eds) Heavy metals in the marine environment. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  34. Welz B, Melcher M, Schlemmer G (1983) Determination of selenium in human blood serum. Comparison of two atomic absorption spectrometric procedures. Frensenius' Z Anal Chem 316:271–276.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joanna Burger
    • 1
    • 2
  • James A. RodgersJr.
    • 3
  • Michael Gochfeld
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesRutgers UniversityPiscatawayUSA
  2. 2.Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences InstitutePiscatawayUSA
  3. 3.Wildlife Research LaboratoryFlorida Game and Fresh Water Fish CommissionGainesvilleUSA
  4. 4.Environmental and Community MedicineUMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical SchoolPiscatawayUSA

Personalised recommendations