Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

A consideration of caregiver age variables in day-care Settings

  • 22 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

The increasing demand for day-care services in the United States warrants a closer, more systematic examination of specific variables in day-care programming. With an emphasis on optimizing the day-care environment, observations and data from a variety of developmental disciplines are used to establish the significance of caregiver age/age-range as a plausible influence on child development and, hence, an important factor for consideration in day-care programming. Two conceivable pathways by which this variable may operate on child outcomes are outlined: (a)primary effects of providing young adult (preadolescent) role models, regular interaction with the elderly, and the simultaneous contrast of their attitudes, perspectives, and practices; and (b)secondary effects resulting from the enhancement or impairment of staff relations as a result of these contrasting styles. The marked absence of research relating caregiver or teacher characteristics, process variables, and outcomes for young children reinforces this topic and that of caregiver variables in general as a potentially productive field for further investigation, particularly in view of the growing impact of day care on American children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Albrecht, S. L., Bahr, H. M., & Chadwick, B. A. Changing family and sex roles: An assessment of age differences.Journal of Marriage and the Family 1979,41 41–50.

  2. Bandura, A. Social learning theory of identificatory processes. In D. Goslin (Ed.),Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1969.

  3. Bandura, A. Learning through modeling. In Liebert, Poulos, & Marmor (Eds.),Developmental Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1977.

  4. Baruch, G. K., & Barnett, R. C. Competence-related behaviors of preschool girls.Genetic Psychology Monographs 1981,103 79–103.

  5. Baumrind, D., & Black, A. E. Socialization practices associated with dimensions of competence in preschool boys and girls.Child Development 1967,38 291–327.

  6. Bronfenbrenner, U. The origins of alienation.Scientific American 1974,231 53–61.

  7. Bronfenbrenner, U. Toward an experimental ecology of human development.American Psychologist 1977,32 513–30.

  8. Cicirelli, V. G. The effect of sibling relationship on concept learning of young children taught by child-teachers.Child Development 1972,43 282–87.

  9. Featherstone, H. The use of settings in a heterogeneous preschool.Young Children 1974,29 147–54.

  10. Goldstein, K. M., Taub, H. B., Caputo, D. V., & Silberstein, R. M. Child status and demographic variables as related to maternal childrearing attitudes.Perceptual and Motor Skills 1976,42(1), 87–97.

  11. Gordon, I. J., & Jester, R. E. Techniques of observing teaching in early childhood and outcomes of particular procedures. In R. M. Travers (Ed.),Second handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1973.

  12. Grusec, J. E. Demand characteristics of the modeling experiment: Altruism as a function of age and aggression.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1972,22 139–48.

  13. Hamilton, M. L., & Stewart, D. M. Peer models and language acquisition.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 1977,23 45–55.

  14. Hartup, W. W. Peer relations and the growth of social competence. In M. W. Kent & J. E. Rolf (Eds.),Primary prevention of psychopathology, Vol 3, Social competence in children. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1979.

  15. Hartup, W. W. & Coates, B. Imitation of peers as a function of reinforcement from the peer group and rewardingness of the model.Child Development 1967,38 1003–16.

  16. Hartup, W.W. & Lougee, M. D. Peers as models.School Psychology Digest 1975,4 11–21.

  17. Hofferth, S. L. Day care in the next decade: 1980–1990.Journal of Marriage and the Family 1979,41 649–58.

  18. Jambor, T. W. Teacher role behavior: Day Care versus nursery school.Child Care Quarterly 1975,4 93–100.

  19. Jantz, R. K., Seefeldt, C., Galper, A., & Serlock, K. Children's attitudes toward the elderly.Social Education 1977,41 518–23.

  20. John, M. T. Teaching children about older family members.Social Education 1977,41 524–27.

  21. Klinzing, D. G., & Klinzing D. R. An examination of the verbal behavior, knowledge, and attitudes of day care teachers.Education 1974,95 65–71.

  22. Lenhart, M. Mixing generations adds new dimensions to child care.The Christian Science Monitor, March 23, 1981, p. 12.

  23. Mead, M. Can the socialization of children lead to greater acceptance of diversity?Young Children 1973,28 322–32.

  24. Mead, M. Grandparents as educators.Teaching College Record, Columbia University, 1974,76 240–49.

  25. Miller, N. B., & Cantwell, D. P. Siblings as therapists: A behavioral approach.American Journal of Psychiatry 1976,133 447–50.

  26. Moore, S. G. The unique contribution of peers to socialization in early childhood.Theory into Practice 1981,20 105–108.

  27. Murphy, L. B.Social behavior and child personality: An exploratory study of some roots of sympathy. New York: Columbia University Press, 1937.

  28. Neugarten, B., & Weinstein, K. The changing American grandparent.Journal of Marriage and the Family 1964,26 199–204.

  29. Peifer, M. R. The effects of varying age-grade status of models on the imitative behavior of six-year-old boys.Dissertation Abstracts International 1972,32(11A), 6216–17.

  30. Peters, D. L., & Belsky, J. The day care movement: Past, present, and future. In M. Kostelnik & H. Fitzgerald (Eds.),Child nurturance: Patterns of supplementary parenting (Vol. 2). New York: Plenum Publishing Corp., 1981.

  31. Powell, D. R. The interpersonal relationship between parents and caregivers in day care settings.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 1978,48 680–89.

  32. Powell, J. A., & Lamson, P. A. Intergenerational sharing: Young children and aging adults.Journal of Home Economics 1979,71 35–39.

  33. Prescott, E., Jones, E., & Kritchevsky, S.Group day care as a childrearing environment (Final Report to the Children's Bureau). Pasadena, CA: Pacific Oaks College, 1967.

  34. Ruopp, R., Travers, J., Glantz, F., & Coelen, C.Children at the center: Summary findings and their implications (Final report of the National Day Care Study, Vol. 1). Cambridge: Abt Associates, Inc., 1979.

  35. Rutter, M. Parent-child separation: Psychological effects on the children.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines 1971,12 233–60.

  36. Scott, B. R. Grandparent presence as a variable in child development.Dissertation Abstracts International 1975,35(7A), 4260–61.

  37. Sears, P. S., & Dowley, E. M. Research on teaching in the nursery school. In N. L. Gage (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1967.

  38. Talbot, N. B. (Ed.)Raising children in modern America: Problems and prospective solutions. Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1976.

  39. Urban Institute.The subtle revolution: Women at work. Washington, D.C.: Department of Housing and Urban Development, 1980.

  40. Wakefield, A. P. Multi-age grouping in day care.Children Today, May–June 1979, pp. 26–28.

  41. Weisner, T. S., & Gallimore, R. My brother's keeper: Child and sibling caretaking.Current Anthropology 1977,18 169–90.

  42. Wolters, P. R. Preschool children's imitation of sharing behavior as a function of age of model, sex of model, and sex of subject.Dissertation Abstracts International 1976,37(6A), 3390–91.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Joan I. Vondra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vondra, J.I. A consideration of caregiver age variables in day-care Settings. Child Youth Care Forum 13, 102–115 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01141837

Download citation

Keywords

  • Primary Effect
  • Role Model
  • Child Development
  • Child Outcome
  • American Child