Biology of Metals

, Volume 3, Issue 3–4, pp 237–241

Novel effect of aromatic compounds on the iron-dependent expression of theEscherichia coli K12 manganese superoxide dismutase (sodA) gene

  • Eric C. Niederhoffer
  • James A. Fee
Original articles

Summary

InEscherichia coli, the superoxide dismutase genes (sodA andsodB) sense the availability of Fe through the action of thefur locus [E. C. Niederhoffer, C. M. Naranjo, K. L. Bradley, J. A. Fee (1990) Control ofEscherichia coli superoxide dismutases (sodA andsodB) genes by the ferric uptake regulation (fur) locus,J. Bacteriol. 172, 1930–1938]. Previous work from other laboratories has shown that a variety of metal chelators and of redox-active aromatic compounds can dramatically induce expression ofsodA. Here we show that non-redox-active, non-metal-chelating aromatic compounds also enhance expression of a chromosomalsodA gene fusion and that these effects are strongly modulated by the Fur phenotype (Fur±) and by the availability of iron in the culture medium. The compounds studied were ethidium bromide, hemin, 2,2′-bipyridine, 1,10-phenantroline, 4,7-phenantroline, rhodamine B1, rhodamine 6G, and, for comparison to previous studies, Paraquat.

Key words

Superoxide dismutases Aromatic compounds Ferric uptake regulation 

Abbreviations

DTPA

diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid

Paraquat

N,N′-dimethyl-1,1-bipyridene

bpy

2,2′-bipyridine

phen

1,10-phenanthroline

4,7-phen

4,7-phenanthroline

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bagg A, Neifands JB (1987) Molecular mechanism of regulation of siderophore-mediated iron assimilation. Microbiol Rev 51:509–518Google Scholar
  2. Chen LB, Summerhayes IC, Johnson LV, Walsh ML, Bernal SD, Lampidis TJ (1982) Probing mitochondria in living cells with rhodamine 123. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 46:141–155Google Scholar
  3. Greenberg JT, Monarch P, Chou JH, Josephy PD, Demple B (1990) Positive control of a global antioxidant defense regulon activated by sup eroxide-generating agents inEscherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:6181–6185Google Scholar
  4. Gregory EM, Fridovich I (1973) Induction of superoxide dismutase by molecular oxygen. J Bacteriol 114:543–548Google Scholar
  5. Hassan HM (1989) Microbial superoxide dismutases. Adv Genet 26:65–97Google Scholar
  6. Hassan HM, Fridovich I (1977) Regulation of the synthesis of superoxide dismutase inEscherichia coli. Induction by methylviologen. J Biol Chem 252:7667–7672Google Scholar
  7. Hassan HM, Fridovich I (1979) Intracellular production of superoxide radical and of hydrogen peroxide by redox-active compounds. Arch Biochem Biophys 196:385–395Google Scholar
  8. Jones RW, Garland PB (1977) Sites and specificity of the reaction of bipyridylium compounds with anaerobic respiratory enzymes ofEscherichia coli. Biochem J 164:199–211Google Scholar
  9. Kao SM, Hassan HM (1985) Biochemical characterization of a Paraquat-tolerant mutant ofEscherichia coli. J Biol Chem 260:10478–10481Google Scholar
  10. Kogoma T, Farr SB, Joyce KM, Natvig DO (1988) Isolation of gene fusions inducible by oxidative stressEscherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:4799–4803Google Scholar
  11. Minton KW, Tabor H, Tabor CW (1990) Paraquat toxicity is increased inEscherichia coli defective in the synthesis of polyamines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:2851–2855Google Scholar
  12. Moody CS, Hassan HM (1984) Anaerobic biosynthesis of the manganese-containing superoxide dismutase inEscherichia coli. J Biol Chem 259:12821–12825Google Scholar
  13. Niederhoffer EC, Naranjo CM, Bradley KL, Fee JA (1990) Control ofEscherichia coli superoxide dismutase (sodA andsodB) genes by the ferric uptake regulation (fur) locus. J Bacteriol 172:1930–1938Google Scholar
  14. Nikaido H, Vaara M (1985) Molecular basis of bacterial outer membrane permeability. Microbiol Rev 49:1–32Google Scholar
  15. Sigman DS, Chen C-B (1990) Chemical nucleases: new reagents in molecular biology. Annu Rev Biochem 59:207–236Google Scholar
  16. Simons RS, Jackett PS, Carroll MEW, Lowrie DB (1976) Superoxide independence of Paraquat toxicity inEscherichia coli. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 37:271–280Google Scholar
  17. Tardat B, Touati D (1990) Two global regulators repress the anaerobic expression of MnSOD inE. coli: Fur (ferric uptake regulation) and Arc (aerobic respiration control). EMBO J, in the pressGoogle Scholar
  18. Thresher RJ, Griffith JD (1990) Intercalators promote the binding of RecA to double-stranded DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:5056–5060Google Scholar
  19. Touati D (1988a) Molecular genetics of superoxide dismutases. Free Radical Biol Med 5:393–402Google Scholar
  20. Touati D (1988b) Transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of manganese superoxide dismutase biosynthesis inEscherichia coli, studied with operon and protein fusions. J Bacteriol 170:2511–2520Google Scholar
  21. Tsaneva IR, Weiss B (1990)soxR, a locus governing a superoxide response regulon inEscherichia coli K12. J Bacteriol 172:4197–4205Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric C. Niederhoffer
    • 1
  • James A. Fee
    • 1
  1. 1.Stable Isotope ResourceIsotope and Structural Chemistry Group (INC-4)Los AlamosUSA
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry and BiochemistrySouthern Illinois University at CarbondaleCarbondaleUSA

Personalised recommendations