The Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 121–134 | Cite as

Beyond medical ethics: New directions for philosophy and medicine

  • Raphael Sassower
  • Michael A. Grodin


A unique relationship exists between physicians and philosophers — one that expands on the constructive potential of the liaison between physicians and, for example, theologians, on the one hand, or, social workers on the other. This liaison should focus in the scientific aspects of medicine, not just the ethical aspects. Philosophers can provide physicians with a perspective on both the philosophy and the history of medicine through the ages — a sense of how medicine has adapted to the social cultural and ethical needs of each period. This perspective, while emphasizing medicine asscience, should not be limited to matters of methodology, or to criteria for distinguishing science from other intellectual pursuits, but should be concerned also with the history, sociology and politics of science. Both physicians and philosophers stand to gain from a strengthening of their active liaison now as never before; but most of all, the public will be the beneficiary.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference notes

  1. 1.
    K. Danner Clouser, “Medical ethics: Some uses, abuses, and limitations,”The New England Journal of Medicine, 293:384–388, 1975.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Some of the standard texts and anthologies in Medical Ethics are: T.L. Beauchamp and J.F. Childress,Principles of Biomedical Ethics, New York: Oxford University Press, 1979; S.J. Reiser, A.J. Dyke, and W.J. Curran (eds.),Ethics in Medicine: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary Concerns, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1977; R.M. Veatch,Case Studies in Medical Ethics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Danner Clouser,Teaching Bioethics: Strategies, Problems and Resources, New York: The Hasting Center, 1982.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Raphael Sassower and Michael A. Grodin, Collaborations between physicians and humanists — Beyond the metaphors,Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics, 8 (1):52–55, 1987.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    George Annas,The Rights of Hospital Patients, American Civil Liberties Handbook, New York: Avon Books, 1975.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E.g., Karl R. Popper,Logic of Scientific Discovery (1934), New York: Harper & Row, 1959.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thomas S. Kuhn,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1962.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karl R. Popper,Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, New York: Harper & Row, 1963.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    An excellent recent book is Paul Starr'sThe Social Transformation of American Medicine, The Rise of a Sovereign Profession and the Making of a Vast Industry, New York: Basic Books, 1982.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E.g., Albert R. Jonsen, Mark Siegler, and William J. Winslade,Clinical Ethics, A Practical Approach to Ethical Decisions in Clinical Medicine, New York: Macmillan, 1982.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Raphael Sassower and Michael A. Grodin, Epistemological questions concerning death,Death Studies, 10:335–347, 1986.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Michael A. Grodin and Raphael Sassower, Whose patient is this, anyway? IRB:A Review of Human Subject Research, 4(2):6–7, 1987.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A shift from epistemological certainty to probability has already occurred in clinical medicine, while the quest for certainty has not been diminished at all. It may help to minimize or even transform the quest for certainty (in its psychological context) so it corresponds to medical practices. Raphael Sassower and Michael A. Grodin, Scientific uncertainty and medical responsibility,Theoretical Medicine, 8(2): 221–234, 1987.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    E.g., Lester S. King,The Philosophy of Medicine, The Early Eighteenth Century, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Adolf Grünbaum,The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Raphael Sassower,Philosophy of Economics, A Critique of Demarcation, Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1985.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Though written by a philosopher, the reexamination of Descartes' medical philosophy shows the relation between scientific data and philosophical speculation. Richard B. Carter,Descartes' Medical Philosophy, the Organic Solution to the Mind-Body Problem, Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raphael Sassower
    • 1
  • Michael A. Grodin
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of ColoradoColorado Springs

Personalised recommendations