Prediction of implantation by the sonographic appearance of the endometrium during controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF)
The texture and the thickness of the endometrium as assessed by transvaginal sonography were prospectively evaluated in 123 patients undergoing IVF treatment. Three different types of endometrial patterns could be distinguished: (A) an entirely homogeneous, hyperechogenic endometrium; (B) an intermediate type characterized by the same reflectivity of ultrasound as the myometrium, with a nonprominent or absent central echogenic line; and (C) a multilayered endometrium consisting of prominent outer and midline hyperechogenic lines and inner hypoechogenic regions. On the day before oocyte retrieval, endometrial thickness was significantly greater in the group of patients who achieved pregnancy than in the group who did not (8.7±0.4 vs 7.5±0.2 mm, respectively; P<0.01) and significantly more patients had multilayered, pattern C, endometrium (75% in pregnant women vs 42.4% in nonpregnant women; P<0.01). No pregnancy occurred when the endometrial thickness was less than 6 mm. When type C endometrium >-6 mm thick was seen, the pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was 39%. When type A or B endometrial pattern was seen, the negative predictive value for the occurrence of pregnancy was 90.5%. Our results suggest that transvaginal sonographic evaluation of endometrial texture and thickness may be an indicator of the likelihood of achieving pregnancy.
Key Wordstransvaginal sonography endometrial texture endometrial thickness in vitro fertilization
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Gonen Y, Casper RF, Jacobson W, Blankier J: Endometrial thickness and growth during ovarian stimulation: A possible predictor of implantation in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1989;52:446–450Google Scholar
- 2.Glissant A, de Mouzon J, Frydman R: Ultrasound study of the endometrium during in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril 1985;44:786–790Google Scholar
- 3.Fleischer AC, Kalemeris GC, Entman SS: Sonographic depiction of the endometrium during normal cycles. J Ultrasound Med Biol 1986;12:271–277Google Scholar
- 4.Fleischer AC, Pittway DE, Beard LA, Thieme GA, Bundy AL, James AE Jr, Wentz AC: Sonographic depiction of endometrial changes occurring with ovulation induction. J Ultrasound Med 1984;3:341–346Google Scholar
- 5.Smith B, Porter R, Ahuja K, Craft I: Ultrasonic assessment of endometrial changes in stimulated cycles in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1984;1:233–238Google Scholar
- 6.Welker BG, Gembruch U, Diedrich K, Al-Hasani S, Krebs D: Transvaginal sonography of the endometrium during ovum pickup in stimulated cycles for in vitro fertilization. J Ultrasound Med 1989;8:549–53Google Scholar
- 7.Gonen Y, Casper RF: Does transient hyperprolactinemia during ovarian hyperstimulation interfere with conception or pregnancy outcome. Fertil Steril 1989;51:1007–1010Google Scholar
- 8.Casper RF, Armstrong DT, Brown SE, Daniel SAJ, Yuzpe A, Erskine H: In vitro fertilization: Determination of follicular maturation for timing of human chorionic gonadotropin administration. Fertil Steril 1987;47:345–349Google Scholar
- 9.de Mouzon J, Lefevre B, Frydman R, Belaisch-Allert JC, Guillet-Rosso F, Testart J: Factors affecting human in vitro fertilization: a multifactorial study. Fertil Steril 1985;43:892–896Google Scholar
- 10.Brant T, Levy E, Grant T, Marut E, Leland J: Endometrial echo and its significance in female infertility. Radiology 1985;157:225–229Google Scholar
- 11.Fleisher A, Herbert CM, Sacks GA, Wentz A, Entman S, James A: Sonography of the endometrium during conception and nonconception cycles of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1986;46:442–447Google Scholar
- 12.Forrest TS, Elyaderni MK, Muilenburg MI, Bewtra C, Kable WT, Sullivan P: Cyclic endometrial changes: US assessment with histologic correlation. Radiology 1988;167:233–237Google Scholar