Small Business Economics

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 173–182 | Cite as

Firm-size wage differentials in the Netherlands

  • Hessel Oosterbeek
  • Mirjam van Praag


An unsolved problem in modern labor economics is the positive relation between the size of the firm in which a worker is employed and his wage. One line of research that has been developed quite recently in this field is the application of endogenous switching regression models. In this paper we utilize such a model to investigate firm-size wage differentials in the Netherlands. The principal findings are that larger firms pay higher returns on schooling whereas smaller firms tend to reward IQ. Combined with the finding that high IQ-workers are sorted into the largest firms, the results are consistent with a model of job screening. Furthermore, we find that employed sons of self-employed fathers are more likely to work in small firms and that wage prospects for all types of workers are indeed most favorable in larger firms.


Regression Model Small Firm Large Firm Positive Relation Industrial Organization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Björklund, A. and R. Moffitt, 1987, ‘The Estimation of Wage Gains and Welfare Gains in Self-Selection Models’,The Review of Economics and Statistics 69, 42–49.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, C. and J. Medoff, 1989, ‘The Employer Size-Wage Effect’,Journal of Political Economy 97, 1027–1059.Google Scholar
  3. Garen, J. E., 1985, ‘Worker Heterogeneity, Job Screening, and Firm-size’,Journal of Political Economy 93, 715–739.Google Scholar
  4. Hartog, J., 1988, ‘An Ordered Response Model for Allocation and Earnings’,Kyklos 41, 113–141.Google Scholar
  5. Hartog, J. and G. A. Pfann, 1985, Vervolgonderzoek Noordbrabantse Zesdeklassers (University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
  6. Idson, T. and D. Feaster, 1990, ‘A Selectivity Model of Employer-Size Wage Differentials’,Journal of Labor Economics 8, 99–122.Google Scholar
  7. Jimenez, E. and B. Kugler, 1988, ‘The Earnings Impact of Training Duration in a Developing Country; an Ordered Probit Selection Model of Colombia's Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje (SENA)’,The Journal of Human Resources 22, 228–247.Google Scholar
  8. Lee, L. F., 1978, ‘Unionism and Wage Rates: A Simultaneous Equation Model with qualitative and Limited-Dependent Variables’,International Economic Review 19, 415–433.Google Scholar
  9. Lee, L. F., 1979, ‘Identification and Estimation in Binary Choice Models with Limited (Censored) Dependent Variables’,Econometrica 47, 977–996.Google Scholar
  10. Maddala, G. S., 1986, ‘Disequilibrium, Self-Selection, and Switching Models’, in Z. Griliches and M. D. Intriligator (eds.),Handbook of Econometrics, Volume III, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  11. Main, B. G. M. and B. Reilly, 1993, ‘The Employer Size-Wage Gap: Evidence for Britain’,Economica 60, 125–142.Google Scholar
  12. Oaxaca, R., 1973, ‘Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labour Markets’,International Economic Review 14, 693–709.Google Scholar
  13. Oi, W., 1983a, ‘Heterogeneous Firms and the Organization of Production’,Economic Inquiry 21, 147–171.Google Scholar
  14. Oi, W., 1983b, ‘The Fixed Employment Cost of Specialized Labour’, in J. Triplett (ed.),The Measurement of Labour Costs, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Oosterbeek, H., 1990, ‘Education and Earnings in the Netherlands; an Empirical Analysis’,European Economic Review 34, 1353–1375.Google Scholar
  16. Rees, H. and A. Shah, 1986, ‘An Empirical Analysis of Self-Employed in the U.K.’,Journal of Applied Econometrics 1, 95–108.Google Scholar
  17. Schmidt, C. M. and K. F. Zimmermann, 1991, ‘Work Characteristics, Firm-Size and Wages’,The Review of Economics and Statistics 73, 705–710.Google Scholar
  18. Van den Berg, A. and W. Groot, 1992, ‘Union Membership in the Netherlands: A Cross-Sectional Analysis’,Empirical Economics 17, 537–564.Google Scholar
  19. Van der Gaag, J. and W. Vijverberg, 1988, ‘A Switching Regression Model for Wage Determinants in the Public and Private Sectors of a Developing Country’,The Review of Economics and Statistics 70, 224–252.Google Scholar
  20. Van Ophem, H., J. Hartog and W. Vijverberg, 1993, ‘Job Complexity and Wages’,International Economic Review 34, 853–872.Google Scholar
  21. Willis, R. and S. Rosen, 1979, ‘Education and Self-Selection’,Journal of Political Economy 87, S7-S36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hessel Oosterbeek
    • 1
  • Mirjam van Praag
    • 1
  1. 1.University of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations