Rheologica Acta

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 151–158 | Cite as

Relaxation and retardation functions of the Maxwell model with fractional derivatives

  • C. Friedrich
Original Contributions

Abstract

A four-parameter Maxwell model is formulated with fractional derivatives of different orders of the stress and strain using the Riemann-Liouville definition. This model is used to determine the relaxation and retardation functions. The relaxation function was found in the time domain with the help of a power law series; a direct solution was used in the Laplace domain. The solution can be presented as a product of a power law term and the Mittag-Leffler function. The retardation function is determined via Laplace transformation and is solely a power law type.

The investigation of the relaxation function shows that it is strongly monotonic. This explains why the model with fractional derivatives is consistent with thermodynamic principles.

This type of rheological constitutive equation shows fluid behavior only in the case of a fractional derivative of the stress and a first order derivative of the strain. In all other cases the viscosity does not reach a stationary value.

In a comparison with other relaxation functions like the exponential function or the Kohlrausch-Williams-Watts function, the investigated model has no terminal relaxation time. The time parameter of the fractional Maxwell model is determined by the intersection point of the short- and long-rime asymptotes of the relaxation function.

Key words

Fractional derivative Maxwell model relaxation and retardation functions Mittag-Leffler functions time constants 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Slonimski GL (1967) J Polym Sci C 16:1667–1673Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smit W, de Fries H (1970) Rheol Acta 9:525–534Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bagley RL, Torvik PJ (1983) J Rheol 27:201–210Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rogers L (1983) J Rheol 27:351–372Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vanarsdale WE (1985) J Rheol 29:851–857Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bagley RL, Torvik PJ (1986) J Rheol 30:133–135Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Friedrich C, Heymann L (1988) J Rheol 32:235–241Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Friedrich C, Heymann L, Berger H-R (1989) Rheol Acta 28:535–539Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tschoegl NW (1989) The Phenomenological Theory of Linear Viscoelastic Behavior — An Introduction. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oldham KB, Spanier J (1974) The Fractional Calculus. Academic Press, New York and LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Westbrook PA, Follers JF (1987) Phil Mag A 55:253–268Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Korn GA, Korn TM (1968) Mathematical Handbook. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bateman H (1955) Higher Transcendental Functions, vol III. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rabotnov JN (1977) Elements of the Mechanics of Memorysolids. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stastna J, De Kee M, Schummer P, Otten B (1990) Rheol Acta 29:137–144Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Astarita G, Marrucci G (1974) Principles of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics. McGraw Hill, London New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Friedrich C (1991) to appear in Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Steinkopff-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Friedrich
    • 1
  1. 1.Inst. für Makromolekulare Chemie Hermann-Staudinger-HausAlbert-Ludwigs-Universität FreiburgFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations