Differences in the luteal phases after failed or successful in vitro fertilization and embryo replacement

  • B. Lejeune
  • M. Camus
  • J. Deschacht
  • F. Leroy
Special Contributions

Abstract

Luteal phases after in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo replacement have been studied in 241 cycles. A positive correlation was observed between the follicular estradiol (E2) peak and the progesterone (P) level on day 3 of the luteal phase, but not correlation was found between the E2-peak value and the luteal-phase duration or midluteal P concentration. When the trials were classified in relation to their outcome (i.e., clinical pregnancies, chemical pregnancies, or failures), the mean P level on day 3 of the luteal phase was significantly higher in clinical pregnancies than in chemical pregnancies and in failures. Mean E2 levels on day 3 were not significantly different among the three groups. Values of the E2/P ratio were significantly higher in chemical pregnancies than in the other groups. No significant differences were observed among the three groups on day 8. When comparing trials ending in failure to those leading to clinical pregnancy for the same patients, pregnancies were obtained in cycles in which early luteal P was higher and the early luteal E2/P ratio was lower than in failures cycles. These data suggest that high P levels and a low E2/P ratio in the early luteal phase might have a favorable influence on the implantation process in human IVF.

Key Words

in vitro fertilization luteal phase implantation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    de Mouzon J, Lefèvre B, Frydman R, Belaish-Allart JC, Guillet-Rosso F, Testart J: Factors affecting humanin vitro fertilization: A multifactorial study. Fertil Steril 1985; 43:892–896PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Camus M, Puissant F, Deweze-Van Hoeck J, Leoroy F: Development and quality of IVF trials. Abstracts Handbook-IVth World Conference onin Vitro Fertilization. Melbourne, Australia, Nov. 18–22, 1985Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Frydman R, Testart J, Giacomini P, Imbert M, Martin E, Nahoul K: Hormonal and histological study of the luteal phase in women following aspiration of the preovulatory follicle. Fertil Steril 1982;38:312–317PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cohen J, Debache Cl, Pigeau F, Mandelbaum J, Plachot M, de Brux J: Sequential use of clomiphene citrate, human menopausal gonatropin in humanin vitro fertilization. II. Study of luteal phase adequacy following aspiration of preovulation follicles. Fertil Steril 1984;42:360–365PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garcia JE, Acosta AA, Hsiu JC, Jones HW: Advanced endometrial maturation after ovulation induction with human menopausal gonatropin/human chorionic gonatropin forin vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1984;41:31–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rosenfeld DL, Garcia CR: A comparison of endometrial histology with simultaneous plasma progesterone determination in infertile women. Fertil Steril 1976;27:1256–1266PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shepard MK, Senturia YD: Comparison of serum progesterone and endometrial biopsy for confirmation of ovulation and evaluation of luteal function. Fertil Steril 1977;28:541–548PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cumming DC, Honoré LH, Scott JZ, Williams KP: The late luteal phase in infertile women. Comparison of simultaneous endometrial biopsy and progesterone levels. Fertil Steril 1985;43:715–719PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Testart J, Frydman R, Feinstein MC, Thibault A, Roger M, Scholler R: Interpretation of plasma luteinizing hormone assay for the collection of mature oocytes from women: Definition of a luteinizing hormone surge-initiating rise. Fertil Steril 1981;36:50–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Englert Y, Puissant F, Camus M, Van Hoeck J, Testart J, Frydman R, Leroy F: Conditions du tranfert intrautérin et devenir des embryons. Rev Med Brux 1985;6:615–620PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dirnfeld M, Lejeune B, Camus M, Vekemans M, Leroy F: Growth rate of follicular estrogen secretion in relation to the outcome ofin vitro fertilization and embryo replacement. Fertil Steril 1985;43:379–384PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Radwanska E, Swyer GIM: Plasma progesterone estimation in infertile women and in women under treatment with clomiphene and chorionic gonatropin. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1974;81:107–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Downs KA, Gibson M: Basal body temperature graph and the luteal phase defect. Fertil Steril 1983;40:466–468PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lenton EA, Landgren ED, Sexton L: Normal variation in the length of the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle: Identification of the short luteal phase. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984;91:685–689PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Horta JLH, Fernandez JG, de Soto LB, Cortes-Gallepos V: Direct evidence of luteal insufficiency in women with habitual abortion. Obstet Gynecol 1977;49:705–708PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lenton EA, Adams M, Cooke ID: Plasma steroid and profiles in ovulatory but infertile women. Clin Endocrinol (oxford) 1978;8:241–255Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Seppälä M, Lehtovirta P, Rutawen EM: Detection of chorionic gonatropin activity in infertile cycles with a short luteal phase. Acta Endocrinol (Kbh( 1978;88:164–168Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lenton EA, Sulaiman R, Sobowale O, Cooke ID: The human menstrual cycle: plasma concentrations of prolactin, LH, FSH, oestradiol and progesterone in conceiving and non-conceiving women. J Reprod Fert 1982;65:131–139Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yovich JL, McColm SC, Yovich JM, Matson PL: Early luteal serum progesterone concentrations are higher in pregnancy cycles. Fertil Steril 1985;44:185–189PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lejeune B, Dehou MF, Leory F: Tentative extrapolation of animal data to human implantation. NY Acad Sci (in press) 1986Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Psychoyos A: Hormonal control of ovoimplantation. Vitam Horm 1973;31:201–256PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jones HW, Acosta A, Andrews MC, Garcia JE, Jones GS, Mahntzavinos T, McDowell J, Sandow B, Veeck L, Whibley T, Wilkes C, Wright G: The importance of the follicular phase to success and failure inin vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1973;40:317–321Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Edwards RG:In The Current Clinical and Ethical Situation of Human Reproduction and Their Eugenic, Ethical Implications, CO Carter (ed). London, Academic Press, 1983Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Karsh FJ, Krey LC, Weick RF, Diersahke DJ, Knobil E: Functional luteolysis in rhesus monkey: The role of estrogen. Endocrinology 1973;92:1148–1152PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Board JA, Bhatnagan AS, Bush CW: Effect of oral diethylstilbetrol on plasma progesterone. Fertil Steril 1973;24:95–97PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lehman F, Just-Nastansky I, Behrendt B, Crygau PJ, Bettendorf B: Effect of postovulatory administered oestrogens on corpus luteum function. Acta Endocrinol (Kbh) 1975;79:329–336.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Lejeune
    • 1
  • M. Camus
    • 1
  • J. Deschacht
    • 1
  • F. Leroy
    • 1
  1. 1.Human Reproduction Research Unit, IVF ClinicHôpital Saint PierreBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations