Efficacy of the urinary hemagglutination test (Higonavis) and enzyme immunoassay (Ovustick) in detection of the spontaneous luteinizing hormone surge in an in vitro fertilization/gamete intrafallopian transfer (IVF/GIFT) program
Fifty-eight treatment cycles in an in vitro fertilization/gamete intrafallopian transfer (IVF/GIFT) program were studied to compare the efficacy of two urinary methods, hemagglutination test (Higonavis) and enzyme immunoassay (Ovustick), in detection of spontaneous luteinizing hormone (LH) surge. If an isolated rise in urinary LH level was taken as indicative of LH surge, the false-positive rate was 36.7% for Higonavis and 10.2% for Ovustick. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). If only a sustained rise in urinary LH was taken to indicate LH surge, the false-positive rate was 6.1% for Higonavis and 0% for Ovustick. In the seven cycles with a spontaneous plasma LH surge, there was a positive correlation between the plasma LH levels and the two urinary assay methods in six cycles (85.7%). Compared to plasma LH, there was a mean delay of 17.4 hr by the Higonavis test and 15.6 hr by the Ovustick test. If a sustained rise in urinary LH levels was taken as indicative of LH surge, both methods are quite accurate but the Ovustick appeared to be more specific.
Key Wordsin vitro fertilization (IVF) gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) luteinizing hormone (LH) assays
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Baird DT: Prediction of ovulation: Biophysical, physiological and biochemical coordinates.In Ovulation: Methods for Its Prediction and Detection, SL Jeffcoate (ed). New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1983, pp 1–17Google Scholar
- 3.Trounson AO, Burger HG, Kovac GT: Prediction of ovulation for in vitro fertilization.In Ovulation: Methods for Its Prediction and Detection, SL Jeffcoate (ed). New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1983, pp 83–102Google Scholar
- 4.Tamada T: LH determination in unconcentrated urine by a hemagglutination test. Acta Obstet Gynecol Jap 1976;23(1):27–31Google Scholar
- 5.Varma TR, Patel RH, Everard D: Determination with Higonavis of luteinizing hormone levels in urine compared with those in plasma. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1982;89:87–90Google Scholar
- 7.Ho PC, Kwan M, Chan SYW, ChanPH, Tang LCH: Rapid urinary LH assay for prediction of ovulation. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynecol 1985;25:230–232Google Scholar
- 8.Baker HWG, Bangah ML, Burger HG, Kovacs GT, Summerbell D, Warnes GM: Timing of ovulation by determination of the urinary luteinizing hormone surge with an enzyme-linked monoclonal antibody dipstick (Ovustick). Aust NZ J Obstet Gynecol 1986;26:79–82Google Scholar
- 12.Jeffcoate SL: Use of rapid hormone assays in the prediction of ovulation.In Ovulation: Methods for Its Prediction and Detection, SL Jeffcoate (ed). New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1983, pp 67–82Google Scholar
- 15.Dyahabakhch O, Templeton AA, Hobson BM, McNeilly AS: Prediction of ovulation by measurement of luteinizing hormone. Lancet 1980; :1199–1200Google Scholar