Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Empirical comparison of the MEG and EEG: Animal models of the direct cortical response and epileptiform activity in neocortex


This review directly addresses the appropriateness of the dipole model as a physical representation of neocortical sources produced by evoked and spontaneous epileptiform activity in neocortex. Three dimensional electrical measurements of cellular currents in rat sensory neocortex are compared to the extracranial magnetic fields these currents produce. Comparisons are performed for the direct cortical response (DCR) evoked by electrical stimulation of the cortical surface, and for evoked and spontaneous interictal and ictal discharge of the penicillin focus in the same animal preparation. Our data support the hypothesis that evoked and epileptiform magnetic fields result from intradendritic currents oriented perpendicular to the cortical surface. Furthermore, magnetic fields can be detected from epileptic foci smaller than 3 × 3 mm2. This work provides an empirical foundation for physical models with which to interpret noninvasive neuromagnetic recordings of epileptic discharge in human focal seizure disorders. The dipole approximation appears to be appropriate for the interpretation of magnetic field phenomena in neocortex.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Adrian, E.D. The spread of activity in the cerebral cortex. J. Physiol., 1936, 88: 127–161.

  2. Barth, D.S., Baumgartner, C. and Di, S. Laminar interactions in rat motor cortex during cyclical excitability changes of the penicillin focus. Brain Research, 1990, 508: 105–117.

  3. Barth, D.S. and Di, S. The electrophysiological basis of epileptiform magnetic fields in neocortex. Brain Research, 1990, 550: 35–39.

  4. Barth, D.S. and Di, S. Electrophysiological basis of epileptiform magnetic fields in neocortex: Spontaneous interictal and ictal phenomena. Brain Research, 1991, (in press):

  5. Barth, D.S., Di, S. and Baumgartner, C. Laminar cortical interactions during epileptic spikes studied with principal component analysis and physiological modeling. Brain Research, 1989, 484: 13–35.

  6. Barth, D.S. and Sutherling, W.W. Current source-density and neuromagnetic analysis of the direct cortical response in rat cortex. Brain Research, 1988, 450: 280–294.

  7. Barth, D.S., Sutherling, W.W. and Beatty, J. Intracellular currents of interictal penicillin spikes: Evidence from neuromagnetic mapping. Brain Research, 1986, 368: 36–48.

  8. Bishop, G.H. and Clare, M.H. Sites of origin of electric potentials in striate cortex. J. Neurophysiol., 1952, 15: 201–220.

  9. Bishop, G.H. and Clare, M.H. Responses of cortex to direct electrical stimuli applied at different depths. J. Neurophysiol., 1953, 16: 1–19.

  10. Chang, H.-T. Dendritic potential of cortical neurons produced by direct electrical stimulation of the cerebral cortex. J. Neurophysiol., 1951, 14: 1–21.

  11. Clare, M.H. and Bishop, G.H. Properties of dendrites: apical dendrites of the cat cortex. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1955, 7: 85–98.

  12. Cohen, D. and Hosaka, J. Magnetic field produced by a current dipole. J. Electrocardiol., 1976, 9: 409–417.

  13. Creutzfeldt, O.D., Watanabe, S. and Lux, H.D. Relations between EEG phenomena and potentials of single cortical cells. I. Evoked responses after thalamic and epicortical stimulation. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1966, 20: 1–18.

  14. Humphrey, D.R. Re-analysis of the antidromic cortical response. II. On the contribution of cell discharge and PSPs to the evoked potentials. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1968, 25: 421–442.

  15. Kaufman, L., Okada, Y. and Brenner, D. On the relationship between somatic evoked potentials and fields. Intern. J. Neuroscience, 1981, 15: 223–239.

  16. Li, C.-L. and Chou, S.N. Cortical intracellular synaptic potentials and direct cortical stimulation. J. cell. comp. Physiol., 1962, 60: 1–16.

  17. Mitzdorf, U. Current source-density method and application in cat cerebral cortex: investigation of evoked potentials and EEG phenomena. Physiol. Rev., 1985, 65: 37–100.

  18. Nicholson, C. and Freeman, J.A. Theory of current source-density analysis and determination of conductivity tensor for anuran cerebellum. J. Neurophysiol., 1975, 38: 356–368.

  19. Ochs, S. The direct cortical response. J. Neurophysiol., 1956, 19: 513–523.

  20. Ochs, S. and Booker, H. Spatial and temporal interaction of direct cortical responses. Exp. Neurol., 1961, 4: 70–82.

  21. Ochs, S. and Clark, F.J. Tetrodotoxin analysis of direct cortical responses. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1968, 24: 101–107.

  22. Okada, Y.C. Neurogenesis of evoked magnetic fields. In: S. J. Williamson, G. L. Romani, L. Kaufman and I. Modena (Ed.), Biomagnetism an Interdisciplinary Approach. Plenum Press, New York, 1983: 399–408.

  23. Okada, Y.C., Lauritzen, M. and Nicholson, C. Evoked magnetic field detected from isolated cerebellum in vitro during Purkinje cell activity and spreading depression. Soc. Neuroscience Abs., 1986, 12: 1132.

  24. Okada, Y.C., Lauritzen, M. and Nicholson, C. Magnetic field associated with neural activities in an isolated cerebellum. Brain Research, 1987a, 412: 151–155.

  25. Okada, Y.C., Lauritzen, M. and Nicholson, C. MEG source models and physiology. Phys. Med. Biol., 1987b, 32: 43–51.

  26. Okada, Y.C. and Nicholson, C. (1987). Currents underlying the magnetic evoked field in the cerebellum. 6th International Conference on Biomagnetism. 198–201.

  27. Okada, Y.C. and Nicholson, C. Magnetic evoked field associated with transcortical currents in turtle cerebellum. Biophysical Journal, 1988, 53: 723–31.

  28. Petsche, H., Pockberger, H. and Rappelsberger, P. Mechanisms leading to the propagation of self-sustained seizure activities. In: H. G. Wieser, E. J. Speckmann and J. Engel (Ed.), Current Problems in Epilepsy: The Epileptic Focus. John Libbey, London, 1987: 59–81.

  29. Purpura, D.P. and Grundfest, H. Nature of dendritic potentials and synaptic mechanisms in cerebral cortex of cat. J. Neurophysiol., 1956, 19: 573–595.

  30. Rappelsberger, P., Pockberger, H. and Petsche, H. Current source density analysis: methods and application to simultaneously recorded field potentials of the rabbit's visual cortex. Pflgers Arch., 1981, 389: 159–170.

  31. Rosenblueth, A. and Cannon, W.B. Cortical responses to electric stimulation. Amer. J. Physiol., 1942, 135: 690–741.

  32. Suzuki, H. and Ochs, S. Laminar stimulation for direct cortical responses from intact and chronically isolated cortex. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1964, 17: 405–413.

  33. Swinney, K.R. and Wikswo, J.P.J. A calculation of the magnetic field of a nerve action potential. Biophys. J., 1980, 32: 719–732.

  34. Wikswo, J.P. Cellular action currents. In: S. J. Williamson, G. L. Romani, L. Kaufman and I. Modena (Ed.), Biomagnetism an Interdisciplinary Approach. Plenum Press, New York, 1983: 173–207.

  35. Williamson, S.J. and Kaufman, L. Magnetic fields of the cerebral cortex. In: S. N. Erné, H.-D. Hahlbohm and H. Lbbig (Ed.), Biomagnetism. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1981: 353–402.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Daniel S. Barth.

Additional information

This research was supported by USPHS grant 1-RO1-NS22575, NSF grant BNS-86-57764, and Whitaker Foundation grant S880620.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barth, D.S. Empirical comparison of the MEG and EEG: Animal models of the direct cortical response and epileptiform activity in neocortex. Brain Topogr 4, 85–93 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01132765

Download citation

Key words

  • Magnetoencephalography
  • Electroencephalography
  • Direct cortical response
  • Epilepsy
  • Interictal spikes
  • Penicillin