Biosemiotics —a paradigm of biology

Holliday, R.: Successes and Limitations of Molecular Biology. J. Theor. Biol.132, 253 (1988)PubMedGoogle Scholar

Lehninger, A. L.: Principles of Biochemistry. New York: Worth 1982Google Scholar

Thorpe, W. H.: Reductionism in Biology, in: Studies in the Philosophy of Biology, p. 109 (F. J. Ayala, T. Dobzhansky, eds.). London: MacMillan 1974Google Scholar

Beckner, M.: Reduction, Hierarchies and Organicism, in: ibid p. 163, (F. J. Ayala, T. Dobzhansky, eds.). London: MacMillan 1974Google Scholar

Popper, K. R.: Scientific Reduction and the Essential Incompleteness of All Science, in: ibid., p. 259, (F. J. Ayala, T. Dobzhansky, eds.). London: MacMillan 1974Google Scholar

Maddox, J.: Finding wood among the trees. Nature333, 11 (1988)PubMedGoogle Scholar

Rubin, H.: Molecular biology running into a cul-de-sac? ibid.335, 121 (1988)PubMedGoogle Scholar

Rose, S.: Reflections on reductionism. Trends Biochem. Sci.13, 160 (1988)PubMedGoogle Scholar

Morris, C.: Signs, Language and Behavior. New York: Prentice-Hall 1946Google Scholar

Eco, U.: Einführung in die Semiotik. München: Fink 1988Google Scholar

Eco, U.: A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press 1976Google Scholar

Peirce, C. S.: Collected papers, Vol. 5, p. 302. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press 1934Google Scholar

Bleecken, S.: Welches sind die existentiellen Grundlagen lebender Systeme? Naturwissenschaften77, 277 (1990)PubMedGoogle Scholar

Albrecht-Buehler, G.: In Defence of “Nonmolecular” Cell Biology. Int. Rev. Cytol.120, 191 (1990)PubMedGoogle Scholar

Uexküll, T. v.: Possible contribution of biosemiotics to the problem of communications among lymphocytes, in: The Semiotics of Cellular Communication in the Immune System, p. 25 (E. E. Sercarz, F. Celada, N. A. Mitchison, T. Tada, eds.). Berlin: Springer 1988Google Scholar

Anderson, M., Deely, J., Krampen, M., Randsdell, J., Sebeok, T. A., Uexküll, T. v.: A semiotic perspective on the sciences: steps toward a new paradigm. Semiotica52, 7 (1984)Google Scholar

Wiener, N.: Kybernetik. Düsseldorf: Econ 1963Google Scholar

Baer, E.: The Medical Symptom, in: Frontiers in Semiotics, p. 140 (J. Deely, B. Williams, F. E. Kruse, eds.). Bloomington: Indiana 1986Google Scholar

Krampen, M.: Phytosemiotics, in: ibid., p. 83 (J. Deely, B. Williams, F. E. Kruse, eds.). Bloomington: Indiana 1986Google Scholar

Deely, J.: On the Notion of Phytosemiotics, in: ibid., p. 96 (J. Deely, B. Williams, F. E. Kruse, eds.). Bloomington: Indiana 1986Google Scholar

Sebeok, T. A.: The Sign and its Masters. London: Austin 1978Google Scholar

Sercarz, E. E., Celada, F., Mitchison, N. A., Tada, T. (eds.): The Semiotics of Cellular Communication in the Immune System. Berlin: Springer 1988Google Scholar

Sebeok, T. A. (ed.): Encyclopedic Dictionary of Semiotics. Berlin-New York: Mouton-de Gruyter 1986Google Scholar

Eco, U.: On Semiotics and Immunology, in: The Semiotics of Cellular Communication in the Immune System, p. 3 (E. E. Sercarz, F. Cedala, N. A. Mitchison, T. Tada, eds.). Berlin: Springer 1988Google Scholar

Jerne, N. K.: The generative grammar of the immune system. Biosci. Rep.5, 439 (1985)PubMedGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N.: Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. The Hague: Mouton 1964Google Scholar

Coutinho, A., Forni, L., Holmberg, D., Ivars, F., Vaz, N.: From an Antigen-Centered, Clonal Perspective of Immune Responses to an Organism-Centered Network Perspective of Autonomous Activity in a Self-Referential Immune System. Immunol. Rev.79, 151 (1984PubMedGoogle Scholar

Scott, J. P.: Observation, in: Animal Communication (T. A. Sebeok, ed.). Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press 1968Google Scholar

Prodi, G.: Signs and codes in immunology, in: The Semiotics of Cellular Communication in the Immune System, p. 53 (E. E. Sercarz, F., Celada, N. A., Mitchison, T. Tada, eds.). Berlin: Springer 1988Google Scholar

Sebeok, T. A.: Perspectives in Zoosemiotics. The Hague: Mouton 1972Google Scholar

Florkin, M.: Concepts of molecular biosemiotics and of molecular evolution, in: Comprehensive Biochemistry, Vol. 29A, p. 1 (M. Florkin, E. H. Stotz, eds.). Amsterdam: Elsevier 1974Google Scholar

Sebeok, T. A. (ed.): Animal Communication. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press 1968Google Scholar

Sebeok, T. A.: The Notion of Zoosemiotics, in: Frontiers in Semiotics, p. 74 (J. Deely, B. Williams, F.E. Kruse, eds.). Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press, 1986Google Scholar

Sebeok, T. A.: “Talking with Animals”: Zoosemiotics Explained, in: ibid., p. 76 (J. Deely, B. Williams, F.E. Kruse, eds.). Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press, 1986Google Scholar

Law, J. H., Regnier, F. E.: Pheromones. Ann. Rev. Biochem.40, 533 (1971)Google Scholar

Nordlund, D. A., Jones, R. L., Lewis, W. J. (eds.): Semiochemicals. New York: Wiley 1981Google Scholar

Lugtenberg, B. J. J. (ed.): Signal Molecules in Plants and Plant-Microbe Interactions. Berlin: Springer 1989Google Scholar

Tembrock, G.: Biokommunikation: Informationsübertragung im biologischen Bereich. Berlin: Akademie Verlag 1971Google Scholar

Russert-Kraemer, L.: Prologue: The Necessity of the Organism. Am. Zool.29, 1057 (1989)Google Scholar

Wake, D. B., Roth, G. (eds.): Complex Organismal Functions: Integration and Evolution in Vertebrates. Report of the Dahlem Workshop, Berlin 1988. New York: Wiley 1989Google Scholar

“Is the Organism Necessary?”. Symposium presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Zoologists, New Orleans 1987. Am. Zool.29, 1057 (1989)Google Scholar

Ehrenfeld, D.: Why put a Value on Biodiversity? in: Biodiversity, p. 213 (E. O. Wilson, ed.). Washington: Nat. Acad. Press 1988Google Scholar

Ehrenfeld, D.: Thirty million cheers for diversity. New Scientist 12 June 1986, p. 38Google Scholar

Wilson, E. O.: The coming pluralization of biology and the stewardship of systematics. BioScience39, 242 (1989)Google Scholar

Wilson, E. O. (ed.): Biodiversity. Washington: Nat. Acad. Press 1988Google Scholar

Wilson, E. O.: Time to Revive Systematics. Science230, 1227 (1985)Google Scholar

Eder, J., Rembold, H. (eds.): Chemistry and Biology of Social Insects. München: Peperny 1987Google Scholar

Blum, M. S., Fales, H. M.: Eclectic chemisociality of the honeybee: a wealth of behaviors, pheromones, and exocrine glands. J. Chem. Ecol.14, 2099 (1988)Google Scholar

Wilson, E. O., Hölldobler, B.: Dense heterarchies and mass communications as the basis of organization in ant colonies. Trends Ecol. Evol.3, 65 (1988)Google Scholar

Wenner, A. M.: Honey bees, in: Animal Communication, p. 217 (T. A. Sebeok, ed.). Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press 1968Google Scholar

Rembold, H.: Caste Differentiation of the Honey Bee, in: Chemistry and Biology of Social Insects, p. 3 (J. Eder, H. Rembold, eds.). München: Peperny 1987Google Scholar

Rembold, H., Weigner, Ch.: Chemical composition of chickpea,Cicer arietinum, exudate. Z. Naturforsch.45 c, 922 (1990)Google Scholar

Rembold, H.: Behavioural chemicals in insect-plant interactions, in: Dynamics of Insect-Plant Interactions, p. 71 (T. N. Ananthakrishnan, A. Raman, eds.). New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publ. Co. 1988Google Scholar

Rembold, H.: Azadirachtins, their structure and mode of action, in: Insecticides of plant origin, p. 150 (J. T. Arnason, B. J. R. Philogene, P. Morand, eds.). ACS Symp. Ser.387, 150 (1989)Google Scholar

Rembold, H., Garcia, E. S.: Azadirachtin inhibitsTrypanosoma cruzi infection of its triatomine host,Rhodnius prolixus. Naturwissenschaften76, 77 (1989)PubMedGoogle Scholar

Goldbeter, A. (ed.): Cell to Cell Signalling. London: Academic Press 1989Google Scholar

Crutchfield, J. P., Farmer, J. D., Packard, N. H., Shaw, R. S.: Chaos. Sci. Am.225, 38 (1986)Google Scholar

Mandelbrot, B. B.: The fractal geometry of nature. New York: Freeman 1983Google Scholar

Percival, J.: Chaos: a science for the real world. New Scientist 21 Oct. 1989, p. 42Google Scholar

May, R.: The chaotic rhythms of life. New Scientist 18 Nov. 1989, p. 37Google Scholar

Freeman, W. J.: The physiology of perception. Sci. Am.264 (2), 34 (1991)Google Scholar

West, B. J., Goldberger, A. L.: Physiology in Fractal Dimensions. Am. Sci.75, (1987)Google Scholar

May, R. M.: When two and two do not make four: nonlinear phenomena in ecology. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B.228, 241 (1986)Google Scholar

Hess, B.: Oscillating reactions. Trends Biochem. Sci.2, 193 (1977)Google Scholar

Hess, B., Markus, M.: Order and chaos in biochemistry. ibid.12, 45 (1987)Google Scholar

Haken, H.: Synergetik. Selbstorganisationsvorgänge in der Physik, Chemie und Biologie. Naturwiss. Rdsch.38, 171 (1985)Google Scholar

Prigogine, I.: Vom Sein zum Werden. Zeit und Komplexitat in den Naturwissenschaften. München: Piper 1979; Prigogine, I., Stengers, J.: Order out of chaos: man's new dialogue with nature. New York: Bantam 1984Google Scholar

Mayr, E.: Toward a new philosophy of biology. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press 1988Google Scholar

Mayr, E.: Die Entwicklung der biologischen Gedankenwelt. Berlin: Springer 1984Google Scholar

Sattler, R.: Biophilosophy, Analytic and Holistic Perspectives. Berlin: Springer 1986Google Scholar