Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Predictive value of sperm morphology and movement characteristics in the outcome of in vitro fertilization of human oocytes

  • Special Contributions
  • Published:
Journal of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One hundred fourteen semen samples from Chinese males were analyzed for routine semen parameters including the semen volume, sperm count, percentage motility, and percentage normal morphology. Of these 114 samples, 54 also had movement characteristics of seminal and swim-up sperm evaluated by the computer image analyzer system (Cellsoft; Cryo Resources Co., New York). All semen samples were subjected to the swim-up procedure to harvest the motile sperm before inseminations of human oocytes. Fertilization was considered to have occurred when at least one oocyte was observed with two or more pronuclei. Semen samples were classified as infertile (0% fertilization rate;N=32) or fertile (>0% fertilization rate;N=82) before statistical analyses. There was a significant difference (P<0.005) in percentage normal morphology of seminal sperm between the fertile (mean±SE; 67.3±1.2%) and the infertile (59.3±2.2%) samples. The percentage normal morphology of seminal sperm correlated (r=0.3049;P<0.002) with the fertilization rate and this parameter was selected by the multivariate stepwise discriminant analysis as the discriminator capable of predicting the fertilization rate with 57.9% accuracy. Statistical analyses of samples where sperm movement was also evaluated demonstrated that there was significant differences (P<0.01) between the fertile (N=38) and the infertile (N=16) samples in percentage normal morphology of seminal sperm (67.8±1.8% vs 56.2±2.6%) and curvilinear velocity of swim-up sperm (89.2±3.5 vs 68.2±7.2 μm/sec). The fertilization rates correlated with the percentage normal morphology of seminal sperm (r=0.3868;P<0.005) and velocity of swim-up sperm (r=0.3842;P<0.005). Multivariate stepwise discriminant analysis demonstrated that these two sperm parameters in combination were capable of predicting the fertilization rate with 74.1% accuracy. Our results indicate that seminal sperm morphology, coupled with computerassisted image analysis of movement characteristics of swim-up sperm, can help to predict the outcome of in vitro fertilization of human oocytes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Edwards RC, Fishel SB, Purdy JM: In vitro fertilization of human egg, analysis of follicular growth, ovulation and fertilization.In Fertilization of Human Eggs in vitro, HM Beier, HR Linder (eds). Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1983, pp 169–188

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hirsch I, Gibbons WE, Lipshultz LI, Rossavik KK, Young RL, Poindexter AN, Dodson MG, Fubdley WE: In vitro fertilization in couples with male factor infertility. Fertil Steril 1986;45:659–664

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Matson PL, Turner SR, Yovich JM, Tuvik AL, Yovich JL: Oligospermic infertility treated by in vitro fertilization. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynecol 1986;26:84–87

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mahadevan MM, Trounson AO: The influence of seminal characteristics on the success rate of human in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1984;42:400–405

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Battin D, Vargyas JM, Sato F, Brown F, Marrs RP: The correlation between in vitro fertilization of human oocytes and semen profiles. Fertil Steril 1985;44:835–838

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Acosta AA, Van Uem J, Ackerman SB, Mayer JF, Stecker JF, swanson RJ, Plebam P, Yuan J, Chillik C, Brugo S: Estimation of male fertility by examination and testing of spermatozoa.In In Vitro Fertilization-Norfolk, HW Jones, GS Jones, GD Hodgen, Z. Rosenwaks (eds). Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1985, pp 126–161

    Google Scholar 

  7. Van Uem JFHM, Acosta AA, Swanson RJ, Mayer J, Ackerman SB, Burkman LJ, Veeck L, McDowell JS, Bernardus RE, Jones HW: Male factor evaluation in in vitro fertilization: Norfolk experience. Fertil Steril 1985;44:375–383

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kruger TF, Acosta AA, Simmans KF, Swanson RJ, Matta JF, Oehninger S: Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1988;49:112–117

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu DY, Du Plessis YP, Nayudu PL, Johnston WIH, Baker HWG: The use of in vitro fertilization to evaluate putative tests of human sperm function. Fertil Steril 1988;49:272–277

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gerris J, Khan I: Correlation between in vitro fertilization and human sperm density and motility. J Androl 1987;8: 48–54

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Holt WV, Moore HDM, Hillier SG: Computer-assisted measurement of sperm swimming speed in human semen: Correlation of results with in vitro fertilization assays. Fertil Steril 1985;44:112–119

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeulin C, Feneux D, Serres C, Jouannet P, Guillet-Rosso F, Relaisch-Allart J, Frydman R, Testart J: Sperm factors related to failure of human in vitro fertilization. J Reprod Fertil 1986;76:735–744

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Purdy M: Methods for fertilization and embryo culture in vitro.In Human Conception in vitro, RG Edwards, JM Purdy (eds). London, Academic Press, 1982, pp 135–148

    Google Scholar 

  14. World Health Organization: Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Cervical Mucus Interaction, MA Belsey, R Eliasson, AJ Galegos, KS Moghissi, CA Paulsen, MRN Prasad (eds). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  15. BMDF: BMDP Statistical Software-Manual, WJ Dixon, MB Brown, L Engelman, JW Frane, MA Hill, RI Jennrich, JD Toporek (eds). Berkley, University of California Press, 1985, pp 519–537

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wolf DP, Byrd W, Dandekar P, Quigley MM: Sperm concentration and the fertilization of human eggs in vitro. Biol Reprod 1984;31:837–848

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kruger TF, Swanson RJ, Hamilton M, Simmons KF, Acosta AA, Matta JF, Oehninger S, Morshedi M: Abnormal sperm morphology and other semen parameters related to the out-come of the hamster oocyte human sperm penetration assay. Int J Androl 1988;11:107–113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rogers BJ, Bentwood BJ, Van Campen H, Helmbrecht S, Soderdahl D, Hale RW: Sperm morphology assessment as an indicator of human fertilizing capacity. J Androl 1983;4:119–125

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wickings EJ, Freischem CW, Langer K, Nieschlag E: Heterologous ovum penetration test and seminal parameters in fertile and infertile men. J Androl 1983;4:261–271

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shalgi R, Dor J, Rudak E, Lusky A, Goldman B, Mashiach S, Nebel L: Penetration of sperm from teratospermic men into zona-free bamster eggs. Int J Androl 1985;8:285–294

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Irvine DS: Tests of sperm function and male infertility.In Research in Reproduction, RG Edwards (ed). London, International Planned Parenthood Federation, 1986, pp 2–3

    Google Scholar 

  22. Irvine DS, Aitken RJ: Predictive value of in vitro sperm function tests in the context of an AID service. Hum Reprod 1986;1:539–545

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Aitken RJ: Assessment of sperm function for IVF. Hum Reprod 1988;3:89–95

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu DY, Elton RA, Johnston WIH, Baker HWG: Spermatozoal nuclear chromatin decondensation in vitro, a test for sperm immaturity, correlation with results of human in vitro fertilization. Clin Reprod Fertil 1987;5:191–207

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Overstreet JW, Hembree WC: Penetration of the zona pellucida of nonliving human oocytes by human spermatozoa in vitro. Fertil Steril 1976;33:534–542

    Google Scholar 

  26. Singer SL, Lambert H, Overstreet JW, Hanson FW, Yanagimachi R: The kinetics of human sperm binding to the human zona pellucida and zona-free hamster oocyte in vitro. Gamete Res 1985;12:29–39

    Google Scholar 

  27. Liu DY, Baker HWG: The proportion of human sperm with poor morphology but normal intact acrosomes detected with pisum sativum agglutinin correlates with fertilization in vitro. Fertil Steril 1988;50:288–293

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Overstreet JW, Price MJ, Blazak WF, Lewis EL, Katz DF: Simultaneous assessment of human sperm motility and morphology by videomicrography. J Urol 1981;126:357–360

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jagoe JR, Washbrook NP, Hudson EA: Morphometry of spermatozoa using semiautomatic image analysis. J Clin Pathol 1986;39:1347–1352

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Freund M, Oliveira N: Visual versus cinemicrographic evaluation of human sperm motility and morphology. Arch Androl 1987;19:25–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jagoe JP, Washbrook NP, Pratsis L, Hudson EA: Sperm morphology by image analysis compared with subjective measurement. Br J Urol 1987;60:457–462

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Green DPL: Sperm thrusts and the problem of penetration, Biol Rev 1988;63:79–105

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Overstreet JW, Katz DF, Hanson F, Fonseca JR: A simple inexpensive method for objective assessment of human sperm movement characteristics. Fertil Steril 1979;31:162–172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Makler A: Use of the elaborated multiple exposure photography (MEP) method in routine sperm motility analysis and for research purposes. Fertil Steril 1980;33:160–166

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ishigami J: A new method for rapid spermatozoal concentration and motility: A multiple-exposure photography system using the Polaroid camera. Fertil Steril 1984;41:620–624

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Makler A, MacLusky, Chodos A, Haseltine F, DeCherney A: Rapid microcomputer-based analysis of semen characteristics from photographs taken by the MEP method. Arch Androl 1984;12:91–95

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kamidono S, Hamaguchi T, Okada H, Hazama M, Matsumoto O, Ishigami J: A new method for rapid spermatozoal concentration and motility: A multiple-exposure photography system using the Polaroid camera. Fertil Steril 1984;41:620–624

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Aitken RJ, Best FSM, Richardson DW, Djahanbakkch O, Mortimer D, Templeton AA, Lee MM: An analysis of sperm function in cases of unexplained infertility: Conventional criteria, movement characteristics, and fertilizing capacity. Fertil Steril 1982;38:212–221

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong

    S. Y. W. Chan, P. C. Ho, W. W. K. So, Y. F. Chan & H. K. Ma

  2. Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong

    C. Wang

  3. Department of Zoology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    S. T. H. Chan

Authors
  1. S. Y. W. Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. T. H. Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. C. Ho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. W. W. K. So
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Y. F. Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. H. K. Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chan, S.Y.W., Wang, C., Chan, S.T.H. et al. Predictive value of sperm morphology and movement characteristics in the outcome of in vitro fertilization of human oocytes. J Assist Reprod Genet 6, 142–148 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01130778

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01130778

Key Words

Search

Navigation