Nonlinear mathematical models for the origin of asymmetry in biological molecules
- 36 Downloads
- 27 Citations
Abstract
The origin of chemical chirality is probably associated with a difference in the initial concentrations of two separate populations of primeval organic molecules and possibly even two types of primeval organisms and amplified by nonlinear kinetic processes leading to the death of one population. This theory, as originally developed by F. C. Frank of the University of Bristol, is reviewed in this paper with additional derivations, discussions and generalizations.
The possible effect of asymmetry in the rate constant is compared to the role of statistical fluctuations, and it is shown, that within the simple model investigated here that the role of statistical fluctuations is much more important for the death of one isomer. In the unlikely absence of any fluctuations, the nonlinear kinetic processes amplify the asymmetry in the rate constant and lead to the death of one enanthiomorph.
The role of spatial diffusion is discussed, and it is shown that in the presence of a local excess of one enanthiomorph this excess would have spread in space and grown, destroying the opposite enanthiomorph. If the total population of both enanthiomorphs was exactly composed of equal parts of both types, but local fluctuation increased one type at one place and decreased the same type at a different location, the diffusion and growth rate would have caused spatial separation in the population of both enanthiomorphs.
For generalnth order nonlinear symmetric rate processes (incorporating multitudes of reactions and general diffusion), it is shown that if initially two populations of enanthiomorphs were exactly the same at all locations, then for all times both populations would have increased and remained equal to each other.
Mathematical model was constructed for stereoscopic autocatalysis suggested by Calvin. It was found that under certain special local conditions in the presence of large fluctuation it is possible indeed to have growth of only one type of isomer.
Various approximate methods and numerical solutions are presented in order to facilitate the handling of nonlinear rate equations.
Keywords
Rate Equation Approximate Method Equal Part Spatial Separation Biological MoleculePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Abate, E. H. and Hofelich, F.: 1968,Z. Phys. 209, 13.Google Scholar
- Abate, E. H. and Hofelich, F.: 1969,Z. Naturforsch. 24b, 132.Google Scholar
- Bada, J. and Schroeder, R. A.: 1972,Earth Planetary Sci. Letters 15, 2.Google Scholar
- Bar-Nun, N., Bauer, S. H., and Sagan, C.: 1970,Science 168, 470.Google Scholar
- Bernall, J. D.: 1949,Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 62A, 537.Google Scholar
- Beutner, R.: 1938,Biodynamica 38, 1.Google Scholar
- Blout, E. R., Doty, P. and Yang, J. T.: 1957, ‘Polypeptides’,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 79, 749.Google Scholar
- Bonner, W. A.: 1972, ‘Origins of Molecular Chirality’, in C. Ponnemperuma (ed.)Exobiology, North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam-London, pp. 171–234.Google Scholar
- Calvin, M.: 1969,Chemical Evolution, Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar
- Dauvillier, A.: 1938,L'Astronomia, Bull. Soc. Astron. France 52, 530.Google Scholar
- Eyring, H., Jones, L., and Spikes, J.: 1962, ‘The Significance of Absolute Configurations in Optical Rotation and in Catalysis’, in M. Kasha and B. Pullman (eds.),Horizons in Biochemistry, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Frank, F. C.: 1953, ‘On Spontaneous Asymmetric Synthesis’,Biochem. Biophys. Acta 11, 459.Google Scholar
- Goel, N. S., Maitra, S. C., and Montroll, E. W.: 1971,Rev. Mod. Phys. 43, 231. (Reprinted inNonlinear Models of Interacting Populations, Academic Press, 1971.)Google Scholar
- Gordon, M. A. and Snyder, L. E. (eds.): 1973,Molecules in the Galactic Environment, John Wiley, New York. (Proceedings of Symposium of National Radio Astronomy Observatory and University of Virginia, Nov. 1–7, 1971).Google Scholar
- Gradstein and Ryzyk: 1963,Tables of Integrals, Eq. 3.896.1, GIMFN, Moscow; or Academic Press, 1969.Google Scholar
- Gumbel, E. J.: 1954, ‘Statistical Theory of Extreme Values and Some Practical Applications’, inU.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Applied Math. Series, No. 33.Google Scholar
- Gumbel, E. J.: 1958,Statistical of Extremes, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Havinga, E.: 1954,Biochim. Biophys. Acta,13, 171.Google Scholar
- Hochstim, A. R.: 1963,Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (U.S.A.) 50, 200.Google Scholar
- Hochstim, A. R.: 1971, in R. Buvet and C. Ponnemperuma (eds.),Chemical Evolution and the Origin of Life, North Holland Publishing Co., p. 96.Google Scholar
- Hochstim, A. R., Chang, Yu-chu, and Sachs, G.: 1975, to be published.Google Scholar
- Landau, L. D. and Lifshitz, E. M.: 1958,Statistical Physics, translated from Russian by Pergamon Press, London, Eqs. 112.1 and 113.4.Google Scholar
- Leigh, E. G.: 1968, ‘The Ecological Role of Volterra's Equations’, inSome Mathematical Problems in Biology, Proc. of Symposium on Math. Biology in Washington, D.C., Dec. 1966, The Amer. Math. Society, Providence, R.I.Google Scholar
- Lotka, A. J.: 1920,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 42, 1595;J. Wash. Acad. 22, 461 (1932).Google Scholar
- Lotka, A. J.: 1956,Elements of Mathematical Biology, Dover Publ., New York, (Republication ofElements of Physical Biology, Williams and Wilkins, Inc., 1924).Google Scholar
- Meltz, W. D.: 1973,Science 182, 467.Google Scholar
- Miller, S. L.: 1953,Science 117, 528.Google Scholar
- Miller, S. L. and Urey, H. C.: 1959,Science 130, 245.Google Scholar
- Mills, W. H.: 1932,Chem. and Ind. 51, 750.Google Scholar
- Montroll, E. W. and Badger, W. W.: 1974,Introduction to Quantitative Aspects of Social Phenomena, Gordon and Breach, New York, London, Paris.Google Scholar
- Montroll, E. W. and West, B. J.: 1975, ‘Non-Markoffian and Nonlinear Models of Diffusion, Population Growth and Competition’, Physical Dynamics, Inc., Berkeley, Ca., Report PD-73-038, to be published.Google Scholar
- Oparin, A. I.: 1924,Proishozdenie Zhizni Na Zemlie, Publ. Acad. Sci. USSR, Moscow. (The Origin of Life, Academic Press, New York, 1957).Google Scholar
- Park, W. K., Hochstim, A. R., and Ponnamperuma, C.: 1971, Am. Chem. Soc., National Meeting, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- Park, W. K., Hochstim, A. R., and Ponnamperuma, C.: 1974, in J. Oró, S. L. Miller, C. Ponnamperuma, and R. S. Young (eds.),Cosmochemical Evolution and the Origins of Life, Vol. 2., D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht-Holland/Boston-U.S.A., p. 99.Google Scholar
- Park, W. K.: 1973, Ph.D. Dissertation, Wayne State University.Google Scholar
- Ponnamperuma, C.: 1972,Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 194, 56.Google Scholar
- Pearson, K.: 1898a,Nature 58, 495.Google Scholar
- Pearson, K.: 1898b,Nature 59, 30.Google Scholar
- Prigogine, I.: 1969, in M. Marois (ed.),Theoretical Physics and Biology, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Theor. Phys. and Biology, Versailles, June 1967, North Holland and American Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Richardson, P. I.: 1959,Manual of Mathematical Physics, Pergamon Press (or H. Margenau and C. M. Murphy,The Mathematics of Physics and Chemistry, D. Van Nostrand Co., 1961).Google Scholar
- Ritchie, P. D.: 1947,Adv. Enzymol. 7, 65.Google Scholar
- Urey, H. C.: 1952,Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (U.S.A.) 38, 351.Google Scholar
- Urey, H. C.: 1959,Science 130, 245.Google Scholar
- Volterra, V.: 1930,Rendiconti Sem. Mat. Milano 3, 1958.Google Scholar
- Wald, G.: 1957, ‘The Origin of Optical Activity’,Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 69, 352.Google Scholar