Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 26, Issue 21, pp 5708–5716 | Cite as

Characterization of polyethylene/EPDM/silicon dioxide multicomponent composites by solid-state dynamic mechanical spectroscopy

  • C. Scott
  • H. Ishida
  • F. H. J. Maurer
Papers

Abstract

Various composites of polyethylene, ethylene propylene diene rubber (EPDM), and filler are milled and analysed by solid-state dynamic mechanical spectroscopy. The filler used is silicon powder with an oxidized surface. This filler is a model for materials with siliceous surfaces. The torsion pendulum measurements show that the multicomponent composites exhibited complex viscoelastic behaviour. For composites of polyethylene and silicon dioxide, there is evidence of particle-particle interactions. In composites which include polyethylene, rubber and filler, interactions of the polyethylene and especially of the rubber with the filler surface are significant. Treatment of the filler surface with gamma-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (γ-APS) or gamma-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane (γ-MPS) has a significant influence on the resultant composite dynamic mechanical spectrum. Maleic anhydride grafting of the EPDM rubber also changes the character of the composites. These composites appear to exhibit complex morphologies, which may be controlled to a certain extent by filler surface treatment and grafting to the rubber. There is evidence for a chemical reaction between the maleic anhydride modification of the EPDM and γ-APS during processing on the roll mill. Prediction of the composite properties using the extended van der Poel model is qualitatively useful.

Keywords

Dynamic Mechanical Spectroscopy Maleic Anhydride EPDM Ethylene Propylene Silicon Powder 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    H. Kitamura, in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Composite Materials (ICCM-IV), October 1982, Tokyo, Japan, edited by T. Hayashiet al. (1982) p. 1787.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. G. Comitov, Z. G. Nicolova, I. S. Simeonov, K. V. Naidenour, andA. D. Siarova,Eur. Polym. J. 20 (1984) 405.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. Pukanszky, J. Kolarik, andF. Lednicky, in “Polymer Composites”, edited by B. Sedlacek (W. de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 1986) p. 553.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. Pukanszky, F. Tudos, andT. Kelen,Polym. Comp. 7 (1986) 106.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. Scott, H. Ishida, andF. H. J. Maurer, in Proceedings of the ACS Symposium on Composites, Annaheim, California, September 1986.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. R. Culler, H. Ishida, andJ. L. Koenig, in Proceedings of the 15th National Technical Conference, SAMPE, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1983.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. H. J. Maurer, PhD thesis, University of Duisburg, FRG (1983).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. H. J. Maurer, in “Polymer Composites”, edited by B. Sedlacek (W. de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 1986) p. 399.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    F. H. J. Maurer andR. Kosfeld, Private communication.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Specialty Chemicals, Calculation Guidelines: Silane Treatment of Inorganic Fillers.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    V. Dolakova andF. Hudecek,J. Macromol. Sci. B15 (1978) 337.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    K. Kendall andF. R. Sherliker,Brit. Polym. J. 12 (1980) 85.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. P. Chacko, E. E. Karasz, R. J. Farris, andE. L. Thomas,J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. 20 (1982) 2177.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    F. H. J. Maurer, H. M. Schoffeleers, R. Kosfeld andTh. Uhlenbroich, in “Progress in Science and Engineering of Composites”, edited by T. Hayashi, K. Kawata and S. Umekawa, (ICCM-IV Tokyo, 1982).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    F. H. J. Maurer, R. Kosfeld, andTh. Uhlenbroich,Colloid Polym. Sci. 263 (1985) 624.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    B. L. Lee andL. E. Nielsen,J. Polym. Sci. B15 (1977) 683.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    T. Murayama, in “Dynamic Mechanical Analysis of Polymeric Materials” (Elsevier, New York, 1978) p. 130.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    V. P. Chacko, F. E. Karasz andR. J. Farris,Polym. Engng. Sci. 22 (1982) 968.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. S. Boaira andC. E. Chaffey,ibid. 17 (1977) 715.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    C. D. Han, C. Sandford andH. J. Yoo,ibid. 18 (1978) 849.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    V. P. Chacko, R. J. Farris andF. E. Karasz,J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 28 (1983) 2701.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    N. K. Kalfoglou,J. Macromolec. Sci. B22 (1983) 363.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    T. Nakatsuka, H. Kawasaki, K. Itadani andS. Yamashita,J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 24 (1979) 1985.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    H. Ishida, andJ. D. Miller,Macromolecules 17 (1984) 1659.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Scott
    • 1
  • H. Ishida
    • 1
  • F. H. J. Maurer
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Macromolecular ScienceCase Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA
  2. 2.DSM Research BVGeleenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations