Characterization of polyethylene/EPDM/silicon dioxide multicomponent composites by solid-state dynamic mechanical spectroscopy
- 90 Downloads
- 14 Citations
Abstract
Various composites of polyethylene, ethylene propylene diene rubber (EPDM), and filler are milled and analysed by solid-state dynamic mechanical spectroscopy. The filler used is silicon powder with an oxidized surface. This filler is a model for materials with siliceous surfaces. The torsion pendulum measurements show that the multicomponent composites exhibited complex viscoelastic behaviour. For composites of polyethylene and silicon dioxide, there is evidence of particle-particle interactions. In composites which include polyethylene, rubber and filler, interactions of the polyethylene and especially of the rubber with the filler surface are significant. Treatment of the filler surface with gamma-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (γ-APS) or gamma-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane (γ-MPS) has a significant influence on the resultant composite dynamic mechanical spectrum. Maleic anhydride grafting of the EPDM rubber also changes the character of the composites. These composites appear to exhibit complex morphologies, which may be controlled to a certain extent by filler surface treatment and grafting to the rubber. There is evidence for a chemical reaction between the maleic anhydride modification of the EPDM and γ-APS during processing on the roll mill. Prediction of the composite properties using the extended van der Poel model is qualitatively useful.
Keywords
Dynamic Mechanical Spectroscopy Maleic Anhydride EPDM Ethylene Propylene Silicon PowderPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.H. Kitamura, in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Composite Materials (ICCM-IV), October 1982, Tokyo, Japan, edited by T. Hayashiet al. (1982) p. 1787.Google Scholar
- 2.P. G. Comitov, Z. G. Nicolova, I. S. Simeonov, K. V. Naidenour, andA. D. Siarova,Eur. Polym. J. 20 (1984) 405.Google Scholar
- 3.B. Pukanszky, J. Kolarik, andF. Lednicky, in “Polymer Composites”, edited by B. Sedlacek (W. de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 1986) p. 553.Google Scholar
- 4.
- 5.C. Scott, H. Ishida, andF. H. J. Maurer, in Proceedings of the ACS Symposium on Composites, Annaheim, California, September 1986.Google Scholar
- 6.S. R. Culler, H. Ishida, andJ. L. Koenig, in Proceedings of the 15th National Technical Conference, SAMPE, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1983.Google Scholar
- 7.F. H. J. Maurer, PhD thesis, University of Duisburg, FRG (1983).Google Scholar
- 8.F. H. J. Maurer, in “Polymer Composites”, edited by B. Sedlacek (W. de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 1986) p. 399.Google Scholar
- 9.
- 10.Specialty Chemicals, Calculation Guidelines: Silane Treatment of Inorganic Fillers.Google Scholar
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.V. P. Chacko, E. E. Karasz, R. J. Farris, andE. L. Thomas,J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. 20 (1982) 2177.Google Scholar
- 14.F. H. J. Maurer, H. M. Schoffeleers, R. Kosfeld andTh. Uhlenbroich, in “Progress in Science and Engineering of Composites”, edited by T. Hayashi, K. Kawata and S. Umekawa, (ICCM-IV Tokyo, 1982).Google Scholar
- 15.
- 16.
- 17.T. Murayama, in “Dynamic Mechanical Analysis of Polymeric Materials” (Elsevier, New York, 1978) p. 130.Google Scholar
- 18.
- 19.
- 20.
- 21.
- 22.N. K. Kalfoglou,J. Macromolec. Sci. B22 (1983) 363.Google Scholar
- 23.T. Nakatsuka, H. Kawasaki, K. Itadani andS. Yamashita,J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 24 (1979) 1985.Google Scholar
- 24.