Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Influence of specimen geometry on the results of determination of KIc

  • 23 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Literature cited

  1. 1.

    V. P. Naumenko, L. N. Karpenko, and V. M. Antonenko, Problemy Prochnosti, No. 10 (1973)

  2. 2.

    R. G. Hoagland, Trans. ASME,89 (Ser. D), No. 3 (1967).

  3. 3.

    G. D. Swanson and G. E. Gross, J. Appl. Phys.,40, No. 11 (1969).

  4. 4.

    C. N. Freed, Fracture of Toughened and High-Strength Materials: Theory and Practice, London (1970).

  5. 5.

    S. R. Novak and S. T. Rolfe, J. Mater.,4, No. 3 (1969).

  6. 6.

    S. Mostovoy, H. R. Smith, R. G. Lingwall, and E. J. Ripling, Eng. Fract. Mech.,3, No. 3 (1971).

  7. 7.

    G. P. Cherepanov, A. B. Kaplun, et al., Fiziko-Khim. Mekh. Mat., No. 1 (1970).

  8. 8.

    W. Brown and J. Srawley, in: Testing of High-Strength Metallic Materials for Fracture Strength During Plane Deformation [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1972).

  9. 9.

    A. A. Wells, in: Applied Problems of Fracture Strength [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1968).

  10. 10.

    J. Srawley and W. F. Brown, in: Applied Problems of Fracture Strength [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1968).

  11. 11.

    L. P. Pook, Intern. J. Fract. Mech.,4, No. 3 (1968).

  12. 12.

    V. Yu. Gol'tsev, E. M. Morozov, and P. E. Nedoshivin, Zavod. Lab., No. 1 (1969).

  13. 13.

    S. M. Wiederhorn, A. M. Shorb, and R. L. Moses, J. Appl. Phys.,39, No. 3 (1968).

  14. 14.

    C. E. Turner and J. C. Radon, Fracture 1969. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Fracture, Brighton (1969).

  15. 15.

    J. E. Srawley and B. Gross, Mat. Res. Stand.,7, No, 4 (1967).

  16. 16.

    T. K. Zilova, N. I. Novosel'tseva, and Ya. B. Fridman, Zavod. Lab., No. 10 (1969),

  17. 17.

    T. K. Zilova, N. I. Petrukhina, et al., Zavod. Lab., No. 7 (1961).

  18. 18.

    G. J. Petrak, Eng. Fract. Mech.,4, No. 2 (1972).

  19. 19.

    E. J. Ripling, S. Mostovoy, and R. U. Patrick, Mat. Res. Stand.,4, No. 3 (1964).

  20. 20.

    J. Glucklich, Eng. Fract. Mech.,3, No. 3 (1971).

  21. 21.

    S. M. Wiederhorn and P. R. Townsend, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc.,53, No. 9 (1970).

  22. 22.

    D. L. Harrod, T. E. Hengstenberg, and M. J. Manjoine, J. Mat.,4, No. 3 (1969).

  23. 23.

    I. I. Purdy and J. Shewchuk, J. Mat.7, No. 1 (1972).

  24. 24.

    R. L. Moore, G. E. Nordmark, and J. G. Kaufman, Eng. Fract. Mech.,4, No. 1 (1972).

Download references

Author information

Additional information

Translated from Problemy Prochnosti, No. 10, pp. 81–88, October, 1973.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Naumenko, V.P. Influence of specimen geometry on the results of determination of KIc . Strength Mater 5, 1245–1252 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01129408

Download citation

Keywords

  • Specimen Geometry