, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 293–301 | Cite as

On the field aspect of Quantum fields

  • Nick Huggett
  • Robert Weingard


In this paper we contrast the idea of a field as a system with an infinite number of degrees of freedom with a recent alternative proposed by Paul Teller in Teller (1990). We show that, although our characterisation lacks the immediate appeal of Teller's, it has more success producing agreement with intuitive categorisations than his does. We go on to extend the distinction to Quantum Mechanics, explaining the important role that it plays there. Finally, we take some time to investigate the way in which strings are to be considered fields, and the important differences with scalar fields. Overall, we aim to show that many types of systems may be viewed as fields, and to point out significant distinctions amongst them, thereby expanding our understanding of what it is to fall in this category.


Quantum Mechanics Scalar Field Infinite Number Significant Distinction Recent Alternative 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Horowitz, G. T., J. Lykken, R. Rohm, and A. Strominger: 1986,A Purely Cubic Action for String Field Theory, NSF-ITP-86-61.Google Scholar
  2. Kaku, M. and K. Kikkawa: 1974a: ‘Field Theory of Relativistic Strings. I. Trees’,Physical Review D 10, 1110–1133.Google Scholar
  3. Kaku, M. and K. Kikkawa: 1974b, ‘Field Theory of Relativistic Strings. II. Loops and Pomerons’,Physical Review D 10, 1823–1843.Google Scholar
  4. Prugovečki: 1971,Quantum Mechanics in Hilbert Space, New York and London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Redhead, M.: 1983, ‘Quantum Field Theory for Philosophers’, in P. D. Asquith and T. Nickles (eds.),PSA 1982, vol. 2, East Lansing, Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 57–99.Google Scholar
  6. Schweber, S. S.: 1961,An Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Field Theory, New York, Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  7. Teller, P.: 1990, ‘What the Quantum Field is Not’,Philosophical Topics 18, 175–184.Google Scholar
  8. Thorn, C. B.: 1989, ‘String Field Theory’,Physics Reports 175, 1–101.Google Scholar
  9. Weingard, R.: 1989, ‘A Philosopher Looks at String Theory’, in A. Fine and J. Leplin (eds.),PSA 1988, vol. 2, East Lansing, Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 95–106.Google Scholar
  10. Witten, E.: 1986, ‘Non-Commutative Geometry and String Field Theory’,Nuclear Physics B268, 253–294.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nick Huggett
    • 1
  • Robert Weingard
    • 1
  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations