, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 171–181 | Cite as

Schurz on hypothetico-deductivism

  • Ken Gemes


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Carnap, R.: 1962,Logical Foundation of Probability Theory, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  2. Gemes, K.: 1990, ‘Horwich, Hempel, and Hypothetico-Deductivism’,Philosophy of Science 57, 690–702.Google Scholar
  3. Gemes, K.: 1993, ‘Hypothetico-Deductivism, Content, and & The Natural Axiomatization of Theories’,Philosophy of Science 60, 477–487.Google Scholar
  4. Gemes, K.: 1994, ‘A New Theory of Content I: Basic Content’, forthcoming in theJournal of Philosophical Logic 23.Google Scholar
  5. Grimes, T.: 1990, ‘Truth, Content and the Hypothetico-deductive Method’,Philosophy of Science 57, 514–522.Google Scholar
  6. Glymour, C.: 1980,Theory and Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  7. Glymour, C.: 1980a, ‘Discussion: Hypothetico-Deductivism is Hopeless’,Philosophy of Science 47, 322–325.Google Scholar
  8. Schurz, G.: 1991, ‘Relevant Deduction’,Erkenntnis 35, 391–437.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ken Gemes
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyYale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations