Microelectrode investigation of motor cortex in unanesthetized rabbits
- 12 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Conclusions
- 1.
A microelectrode investigation of the motor cortex of the unanesthetized rabbit has shown that 48% of the cells react to electrocutaneous stimulation by an increase in frequency. Of these cells, 75% are polysensory, i.e., they react also to photic and acoustic stimulation. Only 25% of the cells respond to electrocutaneous stimulation only.
- 2.
The activity of the polysensory neurons is associated with the arousal reaction in the EEG: an increase in the frequency of their activity takes place only when the stimulus evokes an arousal reaction.
- 3.
All the cells responding to electrocutaneous stimulation also modify their activity during a motor reaction. The increase in the frequency of the activity of the monosensory cells takes place simultaneously with the onset of the motor reaction, while in the polysensory cells it takes place before the beginning of the movement, coinciding with the beginning of the arousal reaction in the EEG.
- 4.
The facts obtained suggest that most cells of the motor cortex of the rabbit are polysensory or “nonspecific,” and are connected with the reticular activating system of the brain stem. This diffuse, “nonspecific” activating system evidently plays an important role in the organization of motor reactions.
Keywords
Motor Cortex Brain Stem Acoustic Stimulation Motor Reaction Electrocutaneous StimulationPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.VASILEVSKII, M. N. Proceedings of the 10th Congress of Physiologists. Erevan. 2:139, 1964; Fiziol. Zh. SSSR. 51:711, 1965.Google Scholar
- 2.VINOGRADOVA, O. S. and D. S. LINDSLEY. Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat. 13:207, 1963. (Translation published in Federation Proceedings; Translation Supplement, vol. 23, no. 2, Part II, p. 241, March–April 1964.)Google Scholar
- 3.VORONIN, L. L. Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat. 16:667, 1966.Google Scholar
- 4.KALININ, P. I. In: Nervous Mechanisms of Conditioned-Reflex Activity. Moscow, 1963, p. 200.Google Scholar
- 5.KALININ, P. I. and A. A. SOKOLOVA Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat. 11:1112, 1961.Google Scholar
- 6.KUZNETSOV, A. S. In: Collection on Neurophysiology. Kishinev, 1963, p. 70.Google Scholar
- 7.MELEKHOVA, A. M. and V. L. D'YAKOV. Fiziol. Zh. SSSR. 51: 1965.Google Scholar
- 8.MORRELL, F. Fiziol. Zh. SSSR. 48:251, 1962; in: Electroencephalographic Investigations of Higher Nervous Activity. Moscow, 1963, p. 52.Google Scholar
- 9.NARIKASHVILI, S. P., V. S. ARUTYUNOV, and E. S. MONIAVA, Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat. 15:238, 1965.Google Scholar
- 10.NAUMOVA, T. S. Fiziol. Zh. SSSR. 51:361, 1965.Google Scholar
- 11.NOVIKOVA, L. A., V. S. RUSINOV, and A. F. SEMIOKHINA. Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat. 2: 1952.Google Scholar
- 12.PAVLYGINA, R. A., Tr. Inst. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., Seriya Fiziol. 7: 1962.Google Scholar
- 13.RUSINOV, V. S. Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat. 12:410, 1962.Google Scholar
- 14.SOKOLOVA, A. A. Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat. 8:593, 1958.Google Scholar
- 15.AKIMOTO, H. and O. CREUTZFELDT Arch. Psychiatr. Nervenkr. 196:494, 1957.Google Scholar
- 16.AKIMOTO, H., Y. SAITO, and Y. NAKAMURA. In: Neurophysiologie und Psychophysik des Visuellen Systemes. 1961, p. 363.Google Scholar
- 17.ALBE-FESSARD, D. and P. BUSER. J. Physiol. Pathol. Gen. 45:14, 1953; 47:67, 1955.Google Scholar
- 18.ARDUINI, A. and D. G. WHITLOCK. J. Neurophysiol. 16:430, 1953.Google Scholar
- 19.ARDUINI, A. and P. BERLUCCHI. P. Strata, Arch. Ital. Biol. 101:530, 1963.Google Scholar
- 20.ASANUMA, H. Jap. J. Physiol. 9:94, 1959.Google Scholar
- 21.BROOKS, V. B., P. RUDOMIN, and C. L. SLAYMAN. J. Neurophysiol. 24:286, 1961.Google Scholar
- 22.BUSER, P. and M. IMBERT. In: Sensory Communication. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1961, p. 607.Google Scholar
- 23.CARRERAS, M. and S. A. ANDERSON J. Neurophysiol. 26:100, 1963.Google Scholar
- 24.CREUTZFELDT, O., G. FROMME, and H. KAPP. Exptl. Neurol. 5:436, 1962.Google Scholar
- 25.CREUTZFELDT, O. and R. JUNG. In: Nature of Sleep. Ciba Symposium. London, 1961, p. 131.Google Scholar
- 26.EVARTS, E. V.. J. Neurophysiol. 26:229, 1963.Google Scholar
- 27.FUSTER, J. M. Science. 133:211, 1961.Google Scholar
- 28.JASPER, H., G. RICCI, and B. DOANE. In: Ciba Symposium on Neurological Basis of Behaviour. London, 1958, p. 277.Google Scholar
- 19.KORNHUBER, H. H. and J. C. ASCHOFF Naturwissenschaften. 51:62, 1964.Google Scholar
- 30.KRUPP, P. and M. MONNIER Pflüger's Arch. Ges. Physiol. 278:586, 1964.Google Scholar
- 31.LI CHOU-LU. J. Physiol. 133:40, 1956; J. Neurophysiol. 22:385, 1959.Google Scholar
- 32.MOUNTCASTLE, V. B. J. Neurophysiol. 20:408, 1957.Google Scholar
- 33.MOUNTCASTLE, V. B., P. W. DAVIES and A. L. BERMAN J. Neurophysiol. 20: 374, 1957.Google Scholar
- 34.OKUDA-OSAMU J. Physiol. Soc. Japan. 25:236, 1963.Google Scholar
- 35.PATTON, H. D., A. R. TOWE and T. T. KENNEDY J. Neurophysiol. 25:501, 1962.Google Scholar
- 36.PHILLIPS, C. G. J. Physiol. 189:20, 1955; Q. J. Exptl. Physiol. 41:58, 70, 1956; in: Nature of Sleep. Ciba Symposium. London, 1961, p. 4.Google Scholar
- 37.RICCI, G., B. DOANE, and H. JASPER. Congr. Internat. Sci. Neurol., Bruxelles, 1957, p. 401.Google Scholar
- 38.SCHLAG, J. and R. BALVIN Exptl. Neurol. 8:203, 1963.Google Scholar
- 39.TOWE, A., H. D. PATTON and T. T. KENNEDY. Exptl. Neurol. 8:220, 1963.Google Scholar
- 40.WHITLOCK, D. G., A. ARDUINI and G. MORUZZI J. Neurophysiol. 16:414, 1953.Google Scholar