Advertisement

The inclination of modern jurists to associate lawyers with doctors: Plato's response inGorgias 464–465

  • Bruce Kimball
Article

Abstract

From the turn of the century, jurists have tended to associate lawyers with doctors as professionals and tried to ground this association in an analogy between law and medicine. Paradoxically, such comparisons suggest that American law and medicine are not analogous, while an analogy proposed by Plato illumines more fundamental respects in which law and medicine might be truly analogous.

Keywords

Fundamental Respect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference notes

  1. 1.
    Nathan Glazer, “The Schools of the Minor Professions,”Minerva 12 (1974):346–364; Magali Sarfatti Larson,The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977), chap. 1; Michael J. Powell, “Developments in the Regulation of Lawyers,” Presented to the 1981 annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, p. 1. See also: Dietrich Rueschemeyer, “Doctors and Lawyers: A Comment on the Theory of the Professions,”Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 1 (1964):17; Wilbert E. Moore, in collaboration with Gerald W. Rosenblum,The Professions: Roles and Rules (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1970); William R. Johnson,Schooled Lawyers: A Study in the Clash of Professional Cultures (New York: New York University Press, 1978), chap. 2; W. May,Notes on the Ethics of Doctors and Lawyers (Bloomington: Poynter Center, Indiana University, 1977).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Richard Wasserstrom, “Lawyers as Professionals: Some Moral Issues”Human Rights 5 (Fall 1975): 1, 2n., 5; Charles Frankel, “Review, Code of Professional Responsibility”University of Chicago Law Review 43 (1976): 875; Robert Stevens,Law School: Legal Education in America from the 1850s to the 1980s (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1983), passim.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Charles A. Reich, “The New Property”Yale Law Journal 73 (1964): 757–758, 761; Roger C. Cramton, “Crisis in Legal Services for the Poor”Villanova Law Review 26 (1981): 545.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Julie Taylor, “Demographics of the Legal Profession”Problems in Professional Responsibility, ed. Andrew L. Kaufman, 2d ed. (Boston: Little, Brown, 1984), p. 837.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frances K. Zemans and Victor G. Rosenblum,The Making of a Public Profession (Chicago: American Bar Foundation, 1981), p. 3.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Karl N. Llewellyn,The Bramble Bush, 2d ed. (New York: Oceana, 1951), p. 171.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Everett C. Hughes et al.,Education for the Professions of Medicine, Theology, Law, and Social Welfare (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1973), p. 1; James Luther Adams, “The Vocation of the Lawyer,”Mercer Law Review 31 (1980): 531.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Larson,The Rise of Professionalism, chap.1; Taylor, “Demographics of the Legal Profession,” p. 837.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pier Paolo Vergerio, “On the Noble Character and Liberal Studies of Youth,” inVittorino da Feltre and Other Humanist Educators, ed. and trans. William H. Woodward (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1897), pp. 108–109. Coluccio Salutati's treatiseTractatus de Nobilitate Legum et Medicinae is well analyzed in Lynn Thorndike, “Medicine versus Law in Late Medieval and Medicean Florence,”The Romanic Review 17 (1926): 8–31.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alexis de Tocqueville,Democracy in America (1834), edited by Phillips Bradley (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1945), vol. 1, p. 282.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Paul Starr,The Social Transformation of American Medicine (New York: Basic Books, 1982), chap. 1; Kenneth M. Ludmerer,Learning to Heal: The Development of American Medical Education (New York, Basic Books, 1985), chap.1.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    John Mallory,Modern Entries in English (London: R. Gosling, 1735) vol. 2, p. 367.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    George G. Mercer,The American Scholar in Professional Life, Annual Address delivered before the Association of the Haverford Alumni .... June 24, 1889 (Philadelphia: Haverford College, 1889), pp. 26, 29.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Michael Schudson “The Flexner Report and the Reed Report: Notes on the History of Professional Education in the United States,”Social Science Quarterly 55 (1974): 354.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    George S. Counts, “The Social Status of Occupations: A Problem in Vocational Guidance,”The School Review 33 (January 1925): 16–27; George W. Hartmann, “The Prestige of Occupations: A Comparison of Educational Occupations with Others,”Personnel Journal 12 (October 1934): 144–52; Zemans and Rosenblum,The Making .... (See Note 5) p. 3.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Frank J. Goodnow,The Principles of the Administrative Law of the United States (New York: G.P. Putnam's, 1905), p. 3;Lochner v. New York 198 U.S. 45, 60 (1905); Roscoe Pound,The Lawyer from Antiquity to Modern Times (St. Paul: West, 1953), pp. 7, 10; Pound, “The Profession in the Society of Today,”New England Journal of Medicine 241 (1949): 351–357.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Christopher C. Langdell, “Harvard Celebration Speeches,”Law Quarterly Review 3 (1887): 124. See the Preface to the First Edition of Langdell'sA Selection of Cases on the Law of Contracts, 2d ed. (Boston: Little, Brown, 1879).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ludmerer,Learning to Heal, chaps. 2–4.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Henry M. Hart and Albert M. Sacks,The Legal Process, tent. ed. (Cambridge, n.p., 1958), pp. 1–6; Felix Frankfurter,The Public and Its Government (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1930), p. 156.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    John Dickinson,Administrative Justice and the Supremacy of Law in the United States (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1927), p. 349.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schudson, “The Flexner Report,” p. 351.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Alfred Z. Reed,Training for the Public Profession of the Law (New York: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1921), pp. 3, 41–43.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stevens,Law School, pp. 106, 209; Ludmerer,Learning to Heal, pp. 113–122.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zemans and Rosenblum,The Making, ... (See Note 5), p. 126, n.8.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Warren Burger quoted in Steven Brill, “Headnotes: Uncle Warren,”American Lawyer 5 (October 1984): 9; Pound,The Lawyer, p. 14.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Charles Fried, “The Lawyer as Friend: The Moral Foundations of the Lawyer-Client Relation,”Yale Law Journal 85 (1976): 1072.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gerald J. Postema, “Moral Responsibility in Professional Ethics,”New York University Law Review 55 (1980): 81. See E.A Dauer and A.A. Leff, “Correspondence: Lawyer as Friend,”Yale Law Journal 86 (1977): 573–584; Fried, “Author's Response,”Yale Law Journal 86 (1977): 584–586; Fried,Right and Wrong (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978), chap. 7; Brian Barry, “And Who is my Neighbor?”Yale Law Journal 88 (1979): 629–658.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cf. the views of John of Paris: “Accordingly, the Philosopher (Aristotle) says ... in thePolitics that a lawyer is more estimable than a doctor since the lawyer has charge of souls, the doctor of bodies.” (Tractatus de Potestate Regia et Papali (1302), in Jean Leclercq, ed.Jean de Paris et l'Ecclesiologie du XIIIe Siecle [Paris: Vrin, 1942], p. 214); John of Arezzo: “But medicine is worthier than law because medicine is concerned both with the internal and essential, as well as the external and accidental passions of people, while law deals only with the externals.” (De Medicina et Legum Prestentia [1415] in Thorndike, “Medicine versus Law,” p. 21); and Lon Fuller, who also quotes Aristotle: “It is an easy matter to know the effects of honey, wine, hellebore, cautery and cutting. But to know how, for whom, and when we should apply these as remedies is no less an undertaking than being a physician.” (The Morality of Law (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1964), p. 94.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Translations are fromPlato: The Collected Dialogues, ed. H. Cairns (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1961).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Werner Jaeger,Paideia: The Ideals of Greek Culture (New York: Oxford University Press, 1943), vol. 2, pp. 231–232.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    “Friend to Plato, but friend above all to truth.” See Aristotle,Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Martin Ostwald (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1962) 1156a-1157a, p. 10n.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Charles Fried, “The Laws of Change: The Cunning of Reason in Moral and Legal History,”Journal of Legal Studies 9 (1980): 335–337; Fried,Contract as Promise: A Theory of Contractual Obligation (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981), chap. 1.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lon L. Fuller and John D. Randall, “Preface,” in “Professional Responsibility: Report of the Joint Conference,”American Bar Association Journal 44 (1958): 1159.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Marvin Frankel, “The Search for Truth: An Umpireal View,”University of Pennsylvania Law Review (1975): 1035, 1038–1039.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    “Professional Responsibility, p. 1162.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wasserstrom, “Lawyers as Professionals,” pp. 5–6, 10.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Here and below, I draw upon: Fried, “The Lawyer as Friend,” pp. 1080–1087; John T. Noonan, Jr., “The Purposes of Advocacy and the Limits of Confidentiality,”Michigan Law Review 64 (1966): 1485–1492; Monroe H. Freedman,Lawyers' Ethics in an Adversary System (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1975); Henry D. Levine, “Self-Interest or Self-Defense: Lawyer Disregard of the Attorney-Client Privilege for Profit and Protection,”Hofstra Law Review 5 (1977): 783–829: William H. Simon, “The Ideology of Advocacy: Procedural Justice and Professional Ethics,”Wisconsin Law Review (1978): 29–144; John T. Noonan, Jr. “Book Review: Professional Ethics or Personal Responsibility?”Stanford Law Review 29 (1977): 363–370; Erwin Chemerinsky, “Protecting Lawyers from Their Profession: Redefining the Lawyer's Role,”Journal of the Legal Profession 5 (1980): 31–43; Deborah L. Rhode, “Ethical Perspectives on Legal Practice,”Stanford Law Review 37 (1985): 589–652; David Luban, ed.,The Good Lawyer: Lawyers' Roles and Lawyers' Ethics (Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Allanheld, 1984); “ABA Model Code of Professional Responsibility,” and “ABA Model Rules of Professional Responsibility,” in1985 Selected Standards on Professional Responsibility ed. T.D. Morgan and R.D. Rotunda (Mineola, N.Y.: Foundation Press, 1985).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Emphasis added. “Professional Responsibility,” pp. 1164–1169. Cf. Alan H. Goldman,The Moral Foundations of Professional Ethics (Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield, 1980); Andrew L. Kaufman, “Book Review of Alan H. Goldman, The Moral Foundations of Professional Ethics...”Harvard Law Review 94 (1981): 1504–1517.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Alan A. Stone, “The Myth of Advocacy,”Hospital and Community Psychiatry 30 (1979): 819.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Deborah Rhode, “Why the ABA Bothers: A Functional Perspective on Professional Codes,”Texas Law Review 59 (1981): 693n.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wasserstrom, “Lawyers as Professionals,” p. 14. Cf. Leon R. Kass, “Regarding the End of Medicine and the Pursuit of Health,”The Public Interest No. 40 (summer 1975): 11–42.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Steven Brill, “Headnotes: Uncle Warren, (See Note 25), p. 1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruce Kimball
    • 1
  1. 1.the Graduate School of EducationUniversity of RochesterRochester

Personalised recommendations