The performance of energy extrapolation procedures in truncated averaged coupled-pair functionals
- 29 Downloads
- 6 Citations
Summary
Energy extrapolation techniques in conjunction with individual configuration selection are applied to averaged coupled-pair functional expansions. In order to test the quality of this approach, benchmark calculations have been performed for N2, the open and ring forms of O3, and for the ground and several excited states of CuH and PdH. Reliable energy estimates are obtained for N2 and the two transition metal hydrides and spectroscopic properties are in close agreement with the values for the non-truncated expansions. In the case of O3 the perturbation corrections substantially underestimate the complete singles and doubles results. These deviations cancel to a large extent, however, in the calculated isomerization energy. The accuracy of the one-particle density matrix is examined by computing dipole moments for several electronic states of CuH and PdH. Deviations are significant in some cases. For the evaluation of properties the current approach requires modifications.
Key words
Averaged coupled-pair functionals Energy extrapolationPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Gdanitz RJ, Ahlrichs R (1988) Chem Phys Lett 143:413Google Scholar
- 2.Gershgorn Z, Shavitt I (1968) Int J Quant Chem 2:751Google Scholar
- 3.Buenker RJ, Peyerimhoff SD (1974) Theoret Chim Acta 35:33Google Scholar
- 4.Buenker RJ, Peyerimhoff SD (1975) Theoret Chim Acta 39:217Google Scholar
- 5.Bauschlicher CW, Langhoff SR (1987) J Chem Phys 86:5595Google Scholar
- 6.Marian CM, Blomberg MRA, Siegbahn PEM (1989) J Chem Phys 91:3589Google Scholar
- 7.Bauschlicher CW, Langhoff SR, Komornicki A (1990) Theoret Chim Acta 77:263Google Scholar
- 8.Ahlrichs R, Scharf P (1988) Chem Phys Lett 143:501Google Scholar
- 9.MOLECULE-SWEDEN is an electronic structure program system written by Almlöf J, Bauschlicher CW, Blomberg MA, Chong DP, Heiberg A, Langhoff SR, Malmqvist PA, Rendell AP, Roos BO, Siegbahn PEM, Taylor PRGoogle Scholar
- 10.Pople JA, Seeger R, Krishnan R (1977) Int J Quant Chem; Quant Chem Symposia 11:149Google Scholar
- 11.Epstein DS (1926) Phys Rev 28:695Google Scholar
- 12.Nesbet RK (1955) Proc Roy Soc (London) 230:312Google Scholar
- 13.Jenderek J (1990) Diploma thesis, Univ of BonnGoogle Scholar
- 14.The original version of the MRD-CI programs was written by Buenker RJ, Butscher W, Kammer W, Peyerimhoff SD. The currently used system of programs was essentially expanded and modified by Buenker RJ, Chabalowski CF, Chandra P, Engels P, Ernzerhof M, Hirsch G, Heß BA, Jenderek J, Marian CM, Phillips RAGoogle Scholar
- 15.The interfaces were written by Ernzerhof M, Marian CMGoogle Scholar
- 16.Shepard R, Shavitt I, Pitzer RM, Comeau DC, Pepper M, Lischka H, Szalay PG, Ahlrichs R, Brown FB, Zhao J (1988) Int J Quant Chem; Quant Chem Symp 22:149Google Scholar
- 17.Werner HJ, Knowles PJ (1991) J Chem Phys 94:1264Google Scholar
- 18.Roos BO, Taylor PR, Siegbahn PEM (1980) Chem Phys 48:157Google Scholar
- 19.Cave RJ, Xantheas SS, Feller D (1992) Theoret Chim Acta 83:31Google Scholar
- 20.Murphy RB, Messmer RP (1992) J Chem Phys 97:4170Google Scholar
- 21.Marian CM (1991) J Chem Phys 94:5574Google Scholar
- 22.Marian CM (1990) J Chem Phys 93:1176Google Scholar
- 23.Lagerqvist A, Neuhaus H, Scullman R (1964) Proc Phys Soc 83Google Scholar
- 24.Balasubramanian K, Feng PY, Liao MZ (1987) J Chem Phys 87:3981Google Scholar
- 25.Rohlfing C, Hay PJ, Martin RL (1986) J Chem Phys 85:1447Google Scholar
- 26.Langhoff SR, Petterson LGM, Bauschlicher CW (1987) J Chem Phys 86:268Google Scholar
- 27.Heß BA (1992) Phys Rev A33:3742Google Scholar
- 28.Bauschlicher CW (1982) Chem Phys Lett 91:4Google Scholar
- 29.Engels B (1991) Chem Phys Lett 174:398Google Scholar
- 30.Banichevich A, Peyerimhoff SD, Chem Phys (in press)Google Scholar
- 31.Karlström G, Engström S, Jönson B (1978) Chem Phys Lett 57:390Google Scholar
- 32.Lee TJ (1990) Chem Phys Lett 169:529Google Scholar
- 33.Tanaka T, Morino Y (1969) J Mol Spectrosc 32:538Google Scholar
- 34.Almlöf J, Taylor PR (1987) J Chem Phys 86:4070Google Scholar
- 35.Shih SK, Buenker RJ, Peyerimhoff SD (1974) Chem Phys Lett 28:463Google Scholar
- 36.Burton PG (1979) J Chem Phys 71:961Google Scholar
- 37.Hay PJ, Dunning TH (1977) J Chem Phys 67:2290Google Scholar
- 38.Wilson CW Jr, Hopper DG (1981) J Chem Phys 74:595Google Scholar
- 39.Wright JS, Shih SK, Buenker RJ (1980) Chem Phys Lett 75:513Google Scholar
- 40.Jones RO (1985) J Chem Phys 82:325Google Scholar
- 41.Moscardó F, Andrias R, San-Fabián E (1988) Int J Quant Chem 34:375Google Scholar
- 42.JANAF Thermochemical Tables (1971) 2nd edn, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- 43.Borowski P, Andersson K, Roos BO (1992) J Chem Phys 97:5568Google Scholar
- 44.Werner HJ, Knowles PJ (1988) J Chem Phys 89:5803Google Scholar
- 45.Siegbahn PEM. An internally contracted ACPF programGoogle Scholar
- 46.Werner HJ, Knowles PJ (1990) Theoret Chim Acta 78:175Google Scholar
- 47.Jackels CF, Shavitt I (1981) Theoret Chim Acta 58:81Google Scholar