The Urban Review

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 89–105

Do public schools have a future? A case study of retrenchment and its implications

  • Daniel L. Duke
  • Jon S. Cohen
Article

Abstract

The present paper describes a model for predicting the consequences of reduced funding for public education and a case study designed as an initial test of the validity of the model. The case study highlights an inner-city high school in San Jose, California, during the aftermath of Proposition 13. As a result of the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978, severe limitations were placed on the ability of school districts in California to generate revenues from property taxes. San Jose High School was forced to cut programs and personnel. The impact of these cuts on the capacity of the school to serve its urban clients is investigated. Findings from the case study support the model's prediction that budget cuts in public education are more likely to exert a negative impact on disadvantaged students than on students from middle-class homes. Implications of further cuts in public education in general are discussed in the concluding section of the paper.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Duke, D. L., Cohen, J. S., and Herman, R. Running faster to stay in place: living with retrenchment in New York City schools.Phi Delta Kappan 1981,63 13–18.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Agathon Press, Inc. 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel L. Duke
    • 1
  • Jon S. Cohen
    • 3
  1. 1.School of EducationStanford UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Lewis and Clark CollegeUSA
  3. 3.Department of EconomyUniversity of TorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations