Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 1443–1454 | Cite as

Alkali treatment of coir fibres for coir-polyester composites

  • S. V. Prasad
  • C. Pavithran
  • P. K. Rohatgi
Papers

Abstract

Coir fibres were subjected to alkali treatment with a view to improving the wettability of coir fibres by a commercially available resin such as polyester. Tensile strength of the fibres increases by 15% when the fibres are soaked in 5% aqueous solution of NaOH at 28±1° C for 72 to 76 h after which it shows a gradual decrease. This decrease is much more pronounced when the alkali is replenished after every 24 h. SEM observations showed the removal of cuticle and tyloses from the surface of coir as a result of alkali treatment, resulting in a rough fibre surface with regularly spaced pits. The debonding stress of alkali-treated fibres from polyester matrix was 90% higher than that of untreated fibres from the same matrix. Untreated fibres tended to float in the polyester whereas alkali-treated fibres were uniformly dispersed in polyester. Incorporation of 0.30 volume fraction of untreated and treated fibres in polyester resulted in composites having 11% and less 5% porosity, respectively. Flexural strength, modulus and impact strength of composites containing alkali-treated fibres were 40% higher than those containing the same volume fractions of untreated fibres. Longitudinal ultrasonic velocity and sound attenuation measurements indicated less fibre segregation and better fibre-matrix bonding in composites containing alkali-treated fibres.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    T. Paramasivan andA. P. J. Abdul Kalam,Fibre Sci. Tech. 7 (1974) 85.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. C. McLaughlin,J. Mater. Sci. 15 (1980) 886.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. G. Satyanarayana, A. G. Kulkarni, K. Sukumaran, S. G. K. Pillai, K. A. Cheriyan andP. K. Rohatgi, Proceedings of the International Conference on Composite Structures, Scotland, September 1981 (Applied Science Publishers, England, 1981) p. 42.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daniel A. Scola, in “Composite Materials”, Vol. 6 edited by L. J. Broutman and R. H. Krock (Academic Press, New York, 1974) p. 239.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. Pavithran, K. Gopakumar, S. V. Prasad andP. K. Rohatgi,J. Mater. Sci. 16 (1981) 1548.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Ott, H. M. Spurlin andM. W. Grafflin (eds), “Cellulose and Cellulose Derivatives” Part II (Interscience Publishers, New York, 1954) pp. 863–71.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. G. Clegg,J. Text. Inst. 15 (1924) T6.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. R. Madhava, S. Raman, C. Pavithran, S. V. Prasad andP. K. Rohatgi, paper presented at the 2nd National Symposium on Ultrasonics, New Delhi, February 1982 (Ultrasonic Society of India, New Delhi, 1982).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. R. Madhava, S. Raman, P. K. Rohatgi andM. K. Surappa,Scripta Metall. 15 (1981) in press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. G. Kulkarni, K. G. Satyanarayana, K. Sukumaran andP. K. Rohatgi,J. Mater. Sci. 16 (1981) 905.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Bowling andG. W. Grover,ibid. 14 (1979) 431.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall Ltd. 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. V. Prasad
    • 1
  • C. Pavithran
    • 1
  • P. K. Rohatgi
    • 1
  1. 1.Regional Research LaboratoryCouncil of Scientific & Industrial ResearchIndia

Personalised recommendations