Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Asking the right questions: An analytic framework for reform of urban teacher education

  • 50 Accesses

  • 6 Citations

Abstract

The second wave of educational excellence reforms has focused on improving teaching and teacher education to restore the nation's economic and industrial health and to reduce poverty in the inner cities. The author examines the theoretical underpinning of the conventional linkage between urban poverty, urban education, and urban teacher education, and suggests an alternative framework. An effective program to train urban teachers must address the bureaucratic conditions that sabotage students and teachers' success and encourage mutually respectful relationships among urban schooling's constituents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aronowitz, S., and Giroux, H. (1985).Education Under Siege. Cambridge, MA: Bergin & Garvey.

  2. Barth, R. S. (1972).Open Education and the American School. New York: Agathon Press.

  3. Bastian, A., Fruchter, N., Gittell, M., Greer, C., and Haskins, K. (1986).Choosing Equality: The Case for Democratic Schooling. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

  4. Borman, K. M., and Spring, J. H. (1984).Schools in Central Cities: Structure and Process. New York: Longman.

  5. Brickman, W. (1964a). Soviet attitudes toward John Dewey as an educator. In D. E. Lawson and A. E. Lean (eds.),John Dewey and the World View (pp. 64–136). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

  6. Brickman, W. (ed.) (1964b).John Dewey's Impressions of Soviet Russia and the Revolutionary World: Mexico, China, Turkey, 1929. New York: Teachers College Press.

  7. Cazden, C. B. (1976). How knowledge about language helps the classroom teacher—Or does it: A personal account.The Urban Review 9(2): 72–90.

  8. Center for Popular Economics (1986).Economic Report of the People. Boston: South End Press.

  9. Cohen, D., and Neufeld, B. (1981). Failure of high schools and the progress of education.Daedalus 100(3): 69–90.

  10. Comer, J. P. (1975). Black education: A holistic view.The Urban Review 8(3): 162–170.

  11. Cuban, L. (1970).To Make a Difference: Teaching in the Inner City. New York: Free Press.

  12. Cuban, L. (1987). The Holmes Group report: Why reach exceeds grasp.Teachers College Record 88(3): 348–353.

  13. Davies, D. (1981). Citizen participation in decisionmaking in the schools. In D. Davies (ed.),Communities and Their Schools (pp. 83–120). New York: McGraw Hill.

  14. Davies, D. (1987). Looking for an ecological solution: Planning to improve the education of disadvantaged children.Equity and Choice 4(1): 51–57.

  15. Delpit, L. D. (1988). The silenced dialogue.Harvard Educational Review 58(3): 280–298.

  16. Dewey, J. (1904). The relation of theory to practice in education. InNational Society for the Study of Education Thirty-third Yearbook, Part I. pp. 9–54.

  17. DeYoung, A. J. (1986). Educational excellence versus teacher professionalism. Towards some conceptual clarity.The Urban Review 18(1): 71–86.

  18. Dunne, F. W. (1973). Survival of the innovative teacher: Preparing liberal arts graduates to work for change in the public schools. Thesis, Harvard Graduate School of Education.

  19. Eisenberg, L. (1967). In A. Passow, M. Goldberg, and A. Tannenbaum (eds.),Education of the Disadvantaged (pp. 79–88). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

  20. Evaluation Research Center (1973). Trainers of teacher trainers. (Vol. 2. In-depth study: CUNY). University of Virginia.

  21. Fine, M. (1986). Why urban adolescents drop into and out of public high school.Teachers College Record 87: 393–409.

  22. Giroux, H., and McLaren, M. (1986). Teacher education and the politics of engagement: The case for democratic schooling.Harvard Educational Review 56: 213–238.

  23. Gittell, M., with B. Hoffacker, E., and S. Foster (July 1979).Citizen Organization: Citizen Participation in Educational Decisionmaking. Contract 400-76-0115. National Institute for Education.

  24. Goodman, D. (1977).Delivering Educational Service: Urban Schools and Schooling Policy. New York: Teachers College Press.

  25. Graff, H. J. (1987).The Labyrinths of Literacy. New York: Falmer.

  26. Graham, P. (1984). Schools: Cacophony about practice, silence about purpose.Daedalus 113(4): 29–58.

  27. Graham, P. (1987). Black teachers: A drastically scarce resource.Phi Delta Kappan 68: 598–605.

  28. Guerrero, G. (May 1977). Teacher role conflicts in urban schools: A review of the literature. Unpublished qualifying paper, Harvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, MA.

  29. Gutmann, A. (1987).Democratic Education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  30. Haberman, M. (1988).Preparing Teachers for Urban Schools. Bloomington: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.

  31. Haberman, M.Recruiting and Selecting Teachers for Urban Schools. New York: Teachers College (ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education ED 292 942).

  32. Hawley, W. B., and Vallanti, J. T. (1971).Trainers of Teachers of Teachers. East Lansing: Michigan State University. U.S. Office of Education (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 043 593).

  33. Hodgkinson, H. L. (1985).All One System. Washington, D.C.: Institute for Educational Leadership.

  34. Hunt, J. M. (1969).The Challenge of Incompetence and Poverty. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

  35. Leacock, E. (1971).The Culture of Poverty: A Critique. New York: Simon and Schuster.

  36. Lenin, V.I. (1965). Draft programme of the Russian Communist Party, 1925. InCollected Works of V. I. Lenin, vol. 29 (pp. 110–112). London: Lawrence & Wishart.

  37. Lester, J. (1971). The teacher is also a victim. In E. Leacock (ed.),The Culture of Poverty: A Critique (pp. 109–126). New York: Simon and Schuster.

  38. Levin, H. M. (1986).Educational Reform for Disadvantaged Students: An Emerging Crisis. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association.

  39. Lipsky, M. (1980).Street-level Bureaucracy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

  40. Liston, D. P., and Zeichner, K. M. (1987). Critical pedagogy and teacher education.Journal of Education 169(3): 117–143.

  41. Murnane, R. (in press). Education and the productivity of the workforce: Looking ahead. In R. Lawrence, R. Litan, and C. Schultze (eds.),American Living Standard. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.

  42. National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983).A Nation at Risk. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.

  43. Parker, J. L. (1968). Staffing schools for the urban disadvantaged. Unpublished thesis, Harvard Graduate School of Education.

  44. Perrone, V. (1971). Parents as partners.The Urban Review 5(2): 35–40.

  45. Ravitch, D. (1983).The Troubled Crusade: American Education 1945–1980. New York: Basic Books.

  46. Rogers, D. (1968).110 Livingston Street. New York: Random House.

  47. Smith, B. O., et al. (1969).Teachers for the Real World. Washington, D.C.: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.

  48. Smith, G. R., J. C. Harste, J. M. Mahan, J. M. Clark, R. McGinty, and S. S. Shuner, (1974).Stirrings in Teacher Education. Washington, D.C.: Office of Education, Dept. of HEW.

  49. Sykes, G. (1986). Policy initiatives for developing a teaching profession.Elementary School Journal 86: 365–367.

  50. Tannenbaum, A. J. (1967). In A. H. Passow, M. Goldberg, and A. J. Tannenbaum (eds.),Education of the Disadvantaged (pp. 423–439). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

  51. Tewel, K. J., and S. Trubowitz, (1987). The minority group teacher: An endangered species.Urban Education 22: 355–365.

  52. Trachtenberg, P. L. (1973). The bleak plight of the urban teacher.The Urban Review 6(5–6): 51–56.

  53. Tyack, D. B. (1974).The One Best System. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  54. Warshaw, M. (1985). Schoolopoly: Not a game of chance.The Urban Review 17: 265–268.

  55. Wilson, L. (1928).The New Schools of New Russia. NY: Vanguard Press.

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weiner, L. Asking the right questions: An analytic framework for reform of urban teacher education. Urban Rev 21, 151–161 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01108452

Download citation

Keywords

  • Teacher Education
  • Analytic Framework
  • Education Research
  • Urban Schooling
  • Effective Program