Advertisement

Sociological Forum

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 21–41 | Cite as

Shrewdly irrational

  • Robert H. Frank
Articles

Abstract

This comment on Professor Etzioni's essay consists of three parts. First, it suggests that much of the evidence he describes, both for and against the rationality hypothesis, is much weaker than it appears. Second, it discusses some additional evidence that poses difficulty for the narrow rationalist view. Finally, it examines Etzioni's “caring and sharing” evidence, which poses the sharpest challenge of all to the rationalists. It suggests that although “caring and sharing” is indeed irrational by the conventional standard, there are good reasons why someone who is purely self-interested might wish to become a caring and sharing person. To be such a person, it argues, is to be “shrewdly irrational.”

Keywords

Good Reason Social Issue Rationalist View Conventional Standard Rationality Hypothesis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1975 “Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.” Psychological Bulletin 21:485–489.Google Scholar
  2. 1982 “A behavioral economic approach to the defense mechanisms: Freud's energy theory revisited.” Social Science Information 21:735–779.Google Scholar
  3. Ainslie, George andV. Haendel 1982 “The motive of the will.” In E. Gottheil, A. McLennan, and K. Druley (eds.), Etiologies of Alcoholism and Drug Addiction Springfield, NJ: Thomas.Google Scholar
  4. Ainslie, George andRichard Herrnstein 1981 “Preference reversal and delayed reinforcement.” Animal Learning and Behavior 9:476–482.Google Scholar
  5. Axelrod, Robert 1984 The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Baum, W. andH. Rachlin 1969 “Choice as time allocation.” Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 27:453–467.Google Scholar
  7. Chung, Shin-Ho andRichard Herrnstein 1967 “Choice and delay of reinforcement.” Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 10:67–74.Google Scholar
  8. Cook, Philip 1982 “Alcohol addiction.” Unpublished paper, Duke University.Google Scholar
  9. Cook, Philip andGeorge Tauchen 1982 “The effect of liquor taxes on heavy drinking.” Bell Journal of Economics 13:379–390.Google Scholar
  10. Darwin, Charles 1965 The Expression of Emotions in Man and Animals. (1872) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dawes, Robyn 1980 “Social dilemmas.” Annual Review of Psychology 31:69–93.Google Scholar
  12. Ekman, Paul 1985 Telling Lies. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  13. 1979 Ulysses and the Sirens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. 1985 “Weakness of will and the free-rider problem.” Economics and Philosophy 1:231–265.Google Scholar
  15. Etzioni, Amitai 1987 “How rational we?” Sociological Forum 2:1.Google Scholar
  16. 1985a Choosing the Right Pond. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Frank, Robert H. 1985b “Ifhomo economicus could choose his own utility function, would he want one with a conscience?” Department of Economics working paper, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  18. 1986a “The nature of the utility function.” In A. MacFadyen and H. MacFadyen (eds.), Economic Psychology. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  19. Frank, Robert H. 1986b Passions Within Reason: Prisoner's Dilemmas and the Strategic Role of the Emotions. Unpublished monograph.Google Scholar
  20. Guth, Werner, Rolf Schmittberger, andBernd Schwarze 1982 “An experimental analysis of ultimatim bargaining.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3:367–388.Google Scholar
  21. Hamilton, W. D. 1964 “The genetical theory of social behavior.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 7:1–32.Google Scholar
  22. Herrnstein, Richard 1970 “On the law of effect.” Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior 13:242–260.Google Scholar
  23. 1977 “Economics from a biological viewpoint.” Journal of Law and Economics XX (April):1–52.Google Scholar
  24. 1978 “Natural economy versus political economy.” Journal of Social Biology 1:319–337.Google Scholar
  25. 1984 “The emotions as guarantors of threats and promises.” Department of Economics working paper, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  26. Kahneman, Daniel, Jack Knetsch, and Richard Thaler 1986 “Fairness and the assumptions of economics.” Journal of Business, in press.Google Scholar
  27. Lumsden, Charles andEdward O. Wilson 1981 Genes, Mind, and Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lykken, David T. 1981 A Tremor in the Blood. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  29. McAdams, D. P. 1982 “Intimacy motivation.” In A. Stewart (ed.), Motivation and Society. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  30. McClelland, David 1986 “Some reflections on the two psychologies of love.” Journal of Personality 54:324–353.Google Scholar
  31. Mello, Nancy 1972 “Behavioral studies of alcoholism.” In B. Kissin and K. Begleiter (eds.), The Biology of Alcoholism, vol. 2. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  32. Murstein, B., M. Cerreto, andM. MacDonald 1977 “A theory and investigation of the effects of exchange orientation on marriage and friendship.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 39:543–548.Google Scholar
  33. Parfit, Derek 1984 Reasons and Persons. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  34. Pattison E., M. Sobell, andL. Sobell 1977 Emerging Concepts of Alcohol Dependence. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Rubin, Paul 1979 “An evolutionary model of taste for risk.” Economic Inquiry 17:585–596.Google Scholar
  36. Scitovsky, Tibor 1976 The Joyless Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. 1960 The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  38. 1978 “Altruism, meanness, and other potentially strategic behaviors.” American Economic Review 68 (May):229–230.Google Scholar
  39. 1980 “The intimate contest for self-command.” The Public Interest 60:94–118.Google Scholar
  40. Smith, Adam 1976 A Theory of Moral Sentiments. (1759) Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  41. Solnick, J., C. Kannenberg, D. Eckerman, andM. Waller 1980 “An experimental analysis of impulsivity and impulse control in humans.” Learning and Motivation 11:61–77.Google Scholar
  42. Thaler, R. andH. Shefrin 1981 “An economic theory of self-control.” Journal of Political Economy 89:392–405.Google Scholar
  43. Trivers, Robert L. 1971 “The evolution of reciprocal altruism” Quarterly Review of Biology 46:35–57.Google Scholar
  44. Winston, Gordon 1980 “Addiction and backsliding: A theory of compulsive consumption.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1:295–394.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Eastern Sociological Society 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert H. Frank
    • 1
  1. 1.Cornell UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations