Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 21, Issue 12, pp 4162–4168

An empirical evaluation of structure-property relationships in natural fibres and their fracture behaviour

  • P. S. Mukherjee
  • K. G. Satyanarayana
Papers

Abstract

An attempt is made in this paper to arrive at an empirical relationship between the structure and properties of lignocellulosic fibres through computer analysis. Significant regression equations for ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and percentage elongation of these fibres with structural parameters such as chemical composition, microfibril angle etc., have been arrived at using best fit. The results clearly indicate a narrowing down of the deviations between the observed and derived values of mechanical parameters reported earlier. This is attributed to (a) consideration of several structural parameters in the regression equation and (b) the analysis being free from any assumptions. Finally the fracture modes observed in these fibres have been classified and this is explained in terms of structure-property relationships.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. D. Preston, in “The Molecular Architecture of Plant Cell Walls” (Chapman and Hall, London, 1952) p 40, 120.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. L. Clark, in “Applied X-rays” (Applied Science, London, 1942).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. C. Brown, J. C. Mann andF. T. Pearce,Shirley Inst. Mem. 9 (1930) 1.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Meredith,J. Text. Ind. 27 (1946) T 205.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. P. Stout andJ. A. Jenkins,Ann. Sci. Text. Belges. N4-12 (1955) 231.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. Balshov, R. D. Preston, G. W. Preston, G. W. Ripley andL. C. Spark,Proc. R. Soc. B146 (1957) 460.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. W. S. Hearle,J. Appl. Polym. Sci 7 (1963) 1207.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. R. G. Trelor,Phys. Today (December 1977) 23.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. C. Mclaughlin andR. A. Tait,J. Mater. Sci. 15 (1980) 89.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. G. Kulkarni, K. G. Satyanarayana, K. Sukumaran andP. K. Rohatgi,ibid,16 (1981) 905.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. G. Kulkarni, K. G. Satyanarayana, P. K. Rohatgi andK. Vijayan,ibid. 18 (1983) 2290.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. S. Mukherjee andK. G. Satyanarayana,ibid. 19 (1984) 3925.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Idem, ibid. 21 (1986) 51.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    K. G. Satyanarayana, K. K. Ravikumar, K. Sukumaran, P. S. Mukherjee, S. G. K. Pillai andA. G. Kulkarni,ibid. 21 (1986) 57.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Harris,Eng. Mater. Res. 14 (1971) 583.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    E. C. Mclaughlin,J. Mater. Sci 15 (1980) 886.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    N. M. White andM. P. Ansell,ibid. 18 (1983) 1549.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    K. G. Satyanarayana, K. Sukumaran, A. G. Kulkarni, S. G. K. Pillai, K. A. Cheriyan andP. K. Rohatgi, in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Composite Structures, edited by J. M. Marshall (Applied Science, London, 1981) p. 612.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    D. G. Swift,ibid. p. 602.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    K. G. Satyanarayana, K. Sukumaran, K. K. Rvikumar, S. G. K. Pillai, C. Pavithran, P. S. Mukherjee andB. C. Pai, in Proceedings of the International Conference on “Low Cost Housing for Developing Countries”, Roorke India, November 12–17, 1984 (Sarita Publications, Merut, India, 1984) p. 177.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall Ltd. 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. S. Mukherjee
    • 1
  • K. G. Satyanarayana
    • 1
  1. 1.Materials DivisionRegional Research Labroatory (CSIR)Trivandrum-695019, KeralaIndia

Personalised recommendations