Ionization constants of N-acyl derivatives of glycine
- 35 Downloads
Conclusions
- 1.
The ionization constant of a number of N-acylated derivatives of glycine with acyl substituents of different types were measured by the method of potentiometric titration.
- 2.
A quantitative explanation of the inductive effect of the substituent in the acyl group was performed with the aid of the Taft correlation equation. The reaction constant of ionizationρ* was measured.
- 3.
The constants of transmission of the inductive effect through the amide group were estimated: an estimate of the transmission through the nitrogen atom ZNH=0.36 was given within the framework of the additive scheme.
- 4.
For substituents bonded with an amide bond to an atom with increased electron density, and for charged substituents, a deviation from the correlation dependence is observed. A discussion of the mechanism of the interaction of the substituents with the reaction center or with the amide bond, which, causes the deviations, is cited.
- 5.
The data obtained can be used for a preliminary calculation of the relative reaction rates of amino acids with various protective groups in reactions of peptide synthesis.
Keywords
Nitrogen Atom Potentiometric Titration Inductive Effect Amide Bond Peptide SynthesisPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literature cited
- 1.Yu. I. Khurgin, M. G. Dmitrieva, and E. V. Tripolitova, Reakts. Sposobnost' Organ. Soed.,1, No. 2, 35, Tartu (1964).Google Scholar
- 2.Yu. I. Khurgin and M. G. Dmitrieva, Tetrahedron,21, 2305 (1965).PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.R. W. Taft, In: Steric Effects in Organic Chemistry [Russian translation]., IL (1962), p. 562.Google Scholar
- 4.V. A. Pal'm, Correlation Equations in Organic Chemistry [in Russian], Vol. 1, Tartu (1967), p. 7.Google Scholar
- 5.M. Charton, J. Organ. Chem.,29, 1222 (1964).Google Scholar
- 6.C. Cohn and J. I. Edsall, The Proteins, Amino Acids, and Peptides as Dipolar Ions, Reinhold Publ., New York (1943), p. 85.Google Scholar
- 7.The Chemist's Handbook [in Russian], “Khimiya, “ Vol. 3, Moscow-Leningrad (1964), p. 935.Google Scholar
- 8.A. Bryson, N. R. Davies, and E. P. Serjeant, J. Amer. Chem. Soc.,85, 1933 (1963).Google Scholar
- 9.A. I. Talvik, Reakts. Sposobnost' Organ. Soed.,3, No. 2, 11, Tartu (1966).Google Scholar
- 10.V. A. Pal'm, Uspekhi Khimii,30, 1069 (1961).Google Scholar
- 11.A. Riche and U. F. Sendger, Modern Problems of Physical Organic Chemistry [Russian translation], “Mir” (1967), p. 498.Google Scholar
- 12.T. Curtius, Ber.,17, 1665 (1884).Google Scholar
- 13.E. Fischer and O. Warburg, Ber.,38, 3997 (1905).Google Scholar
- 14.E. Rouwin, J. Organ. Chem.,18, 127, 1546 (1953).Google Scholar
- 15.F. Weygand and E. Leising, Chem. Ber.,87, 248 (1954).Google Scholar
- 16.T. Curtius and L. Levy, J. Prakt. Chem.,70, 89 (1954).Google Scholar
- 17.H. Leuchs, Ber.,39, 857 (1906).Google Scholar
- 18.F. C. McKay and N. F. Alberton, J. Amer. Chem. Soc.,79, 4686 (1957).Google Scholar
- 19.M. Bergmann, L. Zervas, and V. du Vigneand, Chem. Ber.,65, 1192 (1932).Google Scholar
- 20.E. W. McChesney and W. K. Swann, J. Amer. Chem. Soc.,59, 1116 (1937).Google Scholar
- 21.I. H. Billman and W. F. Harting, J. Amer. Chem. Soc.,70, 1473 (1948).Google Scholar
- 22.D. Albert and E. P. Sergeant, Ionization Constants of Acids and Bases [Russian translation], “Khimiya” (1964).Google Scholar