Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 70, Issue 1–4, pp 139–159

Biomass management and energy

  • R. Neil Sampson
  • Lynn L. Wright
  • Jack K. Winjum
  • John D. Kinsman
  • John Benneman
  • Ernst Kürsten
  • J. M. O. Scurlock
Part II Workshop Working Group Papers

Abstract

The impact of managing biomass specifically for the conservation or production of energy can become a significant factor in the global management of atmopsheric CO2 over the next century. This paper evaluates the global potential for: (1) conserving energy by using trees and wood for shading, shelterbelts, windbreaks, and construction material; and (2) increasing the use of biomass and improving its conversion efficiency for producing heat, electricity, and liquid biofuels. The potential reduction in CO2 emissions possible by the anticipated time of atmospheric CO2 doubling was estimated to be up to 50×106t C yr−1 for energy conservation and as high as 4×109 t C yr−1 for energy production. Of the many opportunities, two stand out. Through afforestation of degraded and deforested lands, biomass energy production offers the potential of 0.36 to 1.9×109t C yr−1 emission reduction. Dedicated energy crops, which include short-rotation woody crops, herbaceous energy crops, halophytes, some annual crops, and oilseeds, offer the potential of 0.2 to 1.0×109t C yr−1 emission reduction. Also addressed in the paper, but not quantified, were establishment of new forests, increasing the productivity of existing forests, or protecting forests to sequester C as an offset against CO2 emissions from burning fossil fuels or forest destruction. Also addressed are uncertainties, gaps in scientific knowledge about ecosystems and their management, and policy considerations at the international and national levels.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Betters, D. Wright, L.L., and Couto, L.: 1992, Short Rotation Woody Crop Plantations in Brazil and the United States,Biomass and Bioenergy 1(6), 305–316.Google Scholar
  2. Brandle, J.R., Wardle, T.D., and Bratton, G.F.: 1992, Opportunities to Increase Tree Planting in Shelterbelts and the Potential Impacts on Storage and Conservation, in Sampson, R.N. and Hair, D., eds.,Forests and Global Change, Volume 1: Opportunities for Increasing Forest Cover, Washington, DC:American Forests, pp. 157–176.Google Scholar
  3. Burschel, P., Kürsten, E., and Larson, B.C.: 1993, Die Rolle von Wald und Forstwirtschaft im Kohlenstoffhaushalt — Eine Betrachtung für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Forstl. Forschungsberichte München, Nr. 126, (short version in English).Google Scholar
  4. Dixon, R.K., Andrasko, K.J., Sussman, F.A., Trexler, M.C. and Vinson, T.S.: 1993, this volume.Google Scholar
  5. Farnum, P., Timmis, R. and Kulp, J.L.: 1983, Biotechnology of Forest Yield,Science 219, 694–702.Google Scholar
  6. Glenn, E.P., Pitelka, L.F. and Olsen, M.W.: 1993, this volume.Google Scholar
  7. Graham, R.L., Wright, L.L., and Turhollow, A.: 1992, The Potential for Short Rotation Woody Crops to Reduce CO2 Emissions,Climatic Change 22, 223–238.Google Scholar
  8. Gregersen, H., Draper, S., and Elz, D.: 1989, People and Trees: The Role of Social Forestry in Sustainable Development, Washington, DC: World Bank, 273 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Hall, D.O., 1991, Biomass Energy,Energy Policy 19(8), 711–737.Google Scholar
  10. Hall, D.O., Rosillo-Calle, F., Williams, R.H., and Woods, J.: 1993, Biomass for Energy Supply Prospects, in: Johansson, T.B., Kelly, H., Reddy, A.K.N., and Williams, R.H., eds.,Renewable Energy, Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  11. Houghton, J.T., Callander, B.A. and Varney, S.K. (eds): 1992,Climatic Change 1992 — the Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Report prepared for IPCC by Working Group I, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Keim, C.R. and Venkatasubramanian, K.: 1989, Economics of Current Biotechnological Methods of Producing Ethanol,Trends in Biotech,7, 22–29.Google Scholar
  13. Kinsman, J.D. and Trexler, M.C.: 1993, this volume.Google Scholar
  14. Kürsten, E. and Burschel, P.: 1993, this volume.Google Scholar
  15. Marland, G. and Marland, S.: 1992, Should We Store Carbon in Trees,Water, Air & Soil Pollution,64, 181–196.Google Scholar
  16. Marland, G. and Turhollow, A.F.: 1991, CO2 Emissions from the Production and Combustion of Fuel Ethanol from Cora,Energy 16, 1307–1316.Google Scholar
  17. Nilsson, L. and Wiklund, K.: 1992, Influence of Nutrient and Water Stress on Norway Spruce Production in South Sweden — The Role of Air Pollutants,Plant and Soil 147, 251–265.Google Scholar
  18. Sampson, R.N., Moll, G.A., and Kielbaso, J.J.: 1992, Opportunities to Increase Urban Forests and the Potential Impacts on Storage and Conservation, in: Sampson, R.N. and Hair, D., eds.,Forests and Global Change, Volume 1: Opportunities for Increasing Forest Cover, Washington DC: American Forestsz, pp. 51–72.Google Scholar
  19. Sampson, R.N.: 1981,Farmland or Wasteland: A Time to Choose, Emmaus, PA: Rodale Press. 465 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Scurlock, J.M.O. and Hall, D.O.: 1990, The Contribution of Biomass to Global Energy Use (1987),Biomass 21, 75–81.Google Scholar
  21. Sedjo, R.A. and Lyon, K.S.: 1990,The Long-Term Adequacy of World Timber Supply, Resources for the Future, Washingtonm, DC: John Hopkins University Press, pp. 30–31.Google Scholar
  22. Trexler, M.C.: 1993, this volume.Google Scholar
  23. Trexler, M.C. and Haugen, C.A.: 1993 forthcoming, Keeping it Green: Global Warming Mitigation Through Tropical Forestry, Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  24. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: 1992.Cooling our Communities: A Guidebook on Tree Planting and Light-Colored Surfacing, 22P-2001, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  25. US Environmental Protection Agency: 1993,Forests for the Future: Launching Initial Partnerships, Report of an Interagency Task Force, January 15.Google Scholar
  26. Winjum, J.K., Dixon, R.K., and Schroeder, P.E.: 1992, Estimating the Global Potential of Forest and Agroforest Management Practices to Sequester Carbon,Water, Air & Soil Pollution 64, 213–227.Google Scholar
  27. WRI: 1992,World Resources 1992–1993, World Resource Institute, New York: Oxford University Press, 383 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Wright, L.L. and Hughes, E.: 1993, this volume.Google Scholar
  29. Wright, L.L., Graham, R.L., Turhollow, A.F. and English, B.C.: 1992, The Potential Impacts of Short-Rotation Woody Crops on Carbon Conservation, in: Sampson, R.N. and Hair, D., eds.,Forests and Global Change, Volume 1: Opportunities for Increasing Forest Cover, Washington DC: American Forests, pp. 123–156.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Neil Sampson
    • 1
  • Lynn L. Wright
    • 2
  • Jack K. Winjum
    • 3
  • John D. Kinsman
    • 4
  • John Benneman
    • 5
  • Ernst Kürsten
    • 6
  • J. M. O. Scurlock
    • 7
  1. 1.American ForestsWashington, DCUSA
  2. 2.Environmental Sciences DivisionOak Ridge National LaboratoryOak RidgeUSA
  3. 3.National Council on Air and Stream Improvement at Environmental Protection AgencyEnvironmental Research LaboratoryCorvallisUSA
  4. 4.Environmental Affairs, Edison Electric InstituteWashingtonUSA
  5. 5.Vero BeachUSA
  6. 6.PRIMA KLIMADusseldorf 12Germany
  7. 7.Division of Biosphere SciencesKing's College LondonLondonGreat Britain

Personalised recommendations