Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 70, Issue 1–4, pp 19–37 | Cite as

The global terrestrial carbon cycle

  • T. M. Smith
  • W. P. Cramer
  • R. K. Dixon
  • R. Leemans
  • R. P. Neilson
  • A. M. Solomon
Part II Workshop Working Group Papers


There is great uncertainty with regard to the future role of the terrestrial biosphere in the global carbon cycle. The uncertainty arises from both an inadequate understanding of current pools and fluxes as well as the potential effects of rising atmospheric concentrations of CO2 on natural ecosystems. Despite these limitations, a number of studies have estimated current and future patterns of terrestrial carbon storage. Future estimates focus on the effects of a climate change associated with a doubled atmospheric concentration of CO2. Available models for examining the dynamics of terrestrial carbon storage and the potential role of forest management and landuse practices on carbon conservation and sequestration are discussed.


Climate Change Potential Role Forest Management Carbon Cycle Natural Ecosystem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alcamo, J.B., de Haan, B., de Vries, B., Klein-Goldewijk, K., Kreileman, E., Krol, M., Leeman, R., Vleoedbeld, M. and Zuidema, G.: 1993, IMAGE 2.0: A comprehensive tool to evaluate policy and scientific issues related to global change,Water, Air and Soil Pollution (in press).Google Scholar
  2. Bazzaz, F.A.: 1990,Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21, 167–196.Google Scholar
  3. Bolin, B., Bjorkstrom, A., Keeling, C.D., Bacastow, R. and Siegentaler, U.: 1981,Carboncycle modelling, in: Bolin, B. (ed),Carbon Cycle Modelling, Wiley and Sons, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
  4. Botkin, D.B. and Simpson, L.G.: 1993,Water, Air and Soil Pollution (this volume).Google Scholar
  5. Box, E. O.: 1981,Macroclimate and Plant Forms: An Introduction to Predictive Modeling in Phytogeography, Junk Publishers, The Hague.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, S., Lugo, A.E. and Iverson, L.R.: 1992,Water, Air and Soil Pollution 64, 139–155.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, I.F., Nepstad, D.C., Pires, I.O., Luz, L.M. and Alechandre, A.S.:, 1992,Environmental Conservation 19, 307–315.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, S.: 1993,Water, Air and Soil Pollution (this volume).Google Scholar
  9. Cramer, W. & Leemans, R. (1993). Assessing impacts of climate change on vegetation using climate classification systems, in: Solomon, A.M. and Shugart, H.H. (eds.),Vegetation Dynamics and Global Change, Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 190–217.Google Scholar
  10. Cramer, W. and Solomon, A. M.: 1993, Climatic classifcation and future global redistribution of agricultural land,Journal of Climate Research, (in press).Google Scholar
  11. Curtis, P.D., Drake, B.G. and Whigham, D.F.: 1989,Oecologia 78, 297–301.Google Scholar
  12. Curtis, P.D., Drake, B.G., Leadley, P., Arp, W. and Whigham, D.F.: 1989,Oecologia 78, 20–26.Google Scholar
  13. Davis, M.B.: 1984, Climatic instability, time lags and community disequilibrium, in:Diamond, J. and Case, T.J. (eds)Community Ecology, Harper and Row, New York, pp. 269–284.Google Scholar
  14. Davis, M.B.: 1989,Climatic Change 15, 75–82.Google Scholar
  15. Davis, M.B. and Botkin, D.B.: 1985,Quat. Res. 23, 327–340.Google Scholar
  16. Dixon, R.K. and Turner, D.P.: 1991,Environmental Pollution 72, 245–262.Google Scholar
  17. Dixon, R.K., Andrasco, K.J., Sussman, F.G., Lavin, M.A., Trexler, M.C. and Vinson, T.S.: 1993a,Water, Air and Soil Pollution (this volume).Google Scholar
  18. Dixon, R.K., Winjum, J.K. and Schroeder, P.E.: 1993b, Conservation and sequestration of carbon: The potential of forest and agrosystem management practices.Global Environmental Change (in press).Google Scholar
  19. Dixon, R.K., Winjum, J.K., Andrasko, K.J., Lee, J.J and Schroeder, P.E.: 1993c, Integrated systems: Assessment of promising agroforest and alternative land-use practices to enhance carbon conservation and sequestration,Climatic Change (in press).Google Scholar
  20. Eamus, D. and Jarvis, P.G.: 1989,Adv. Ecol. Res. 19, 1–57.Google Scholar
  21. Emanuel, W.R., Killough, G.G., Post, W.M. and Shugart, H.H.: 1984,Ecology 65, 970–983.Google Scholar
  22. Emanuel, W. R., Shugart, H. H. & Stevenson, M. P.: 1985,Climatic Change 7, 29–43.Google Scholar
  23. Esser, G.: 1991, Osnabruck Biosphere model: structure, construction, results, in: Esser, G. and Overdieck (eds),Modern Ecology: Basic and Applied Aspects, Elsevier, pp. 679–709.Google Scholar
  24. Goudriaan, J. and Ketner, P.: 1984,ClimaticChange 6, 167–192.Google Scholar
  25. Grainger, A.: 1988,International Tree Crops Journal 5, 31–61.Google Scholar
  26. Gregerson, H., Draper, S. and Elz, D.: 1989,People and trees: The role of social forestry in sustainable development, EDI Seminar Series, World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  27. Grisebach, A.: 1838,Linnaea 12, 159–200.Google Scholar
  28. Hall, C.: 1993,Water, Air and Soil Pollution (this volume).Google Scholar
  29. Hansen, J., Lacis, A., Rind, D., Russel, G., Stone, P., Fung, I., Reudy, R., and Lerner, J.: 1984, Climate sensitivity: Analysis of feedback mechanisms, In: Hansen, J. and Thompson, R. (eds),Climate Processes and Climate Sensitivity, Geophysical Monogr.29, American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  30. Hansen, J., Fung, I., Lacis, A., Rind, D., Russell, G., Lebedeff, S., Reudy, R. & Stone, P.: 1988,J. Geophys. Res. 93, 9341–9364.Google Scholar
  31. Harmon, M.E., Ferrell, W.K. and Franklin, J.F.: 1990,Science 247, 699–702.Google Scholar
  32. Holdridge, L. R.: 1947,Life Zone Ecology, Tropical Science Center, San José, Costa Rica.Google Scholar
  33. Holdridge, L.R.: 1959,Science 130, 572.Google Scholar
  34. Houghton, R.A., Hobbie, J.E., Melillo, J.M., Moore, B., Peterson, B.J., Shaver, G.R. and Woodwell, G.M.: 1983,Ecol. Monogr. 53, 235–262.Google Scholar
  35. Houghton, J.T., Jenkins, G.J. and Ephraums (eds): 1990,Climate Change — The IPCC Scientific Assessment, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Houghton, J.T., Callander, B.A. and Varney, S.K. (eds): 1992,Climate Change 1992 — The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Humbolt, A. von: 1867,Ideen zu einem Geographie der Pflazen nebst einem naturgemalde der Tropenlander, Tubingen, FRG.Google Scholar
  38. Janecek, A., Benderoth, G., Ludeke, M.K.B., Kinderman, J. and Kohlmeier, G.H.: 1989,Ecological Modelling 49, 101–124.Google Scholar
  39. King, G.A. and Neilson, R.P.: 1992,Water, Air and Soil Pollution 64, 365–383.Google Scholar
  40. Kohlmaier, M.: 1993,Water, Air and Soil Pollution (this volume).Google Scholar
  41. Koppen, W.: 1900,Geogr. Z. 6, 593–611.Google Scholar
  42. Koppen, W.: 1918,Petermanns Geogr. Mitt. 64, 193–203.Google Scholar
  43. Köppen, W.: 1936, Das geographische System der Klimate, in: Köppen, W. and Geiger, R. (eds.),Handbuch der Klimatologie, Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin, pp. 46.Google Scholar
  44. Krankina, O.N. and Dixon, R.K.: 1993,Forest management options to conserve and sequester terrestrial carbon in the Russian Federation, World Resources Review (in press).Google Scholar
  45. Lashof, D.A.: 1987,The Role of the Biosphere in the Global Carbon Cycle: Evaluating Through Biospheric Modeling and Atmospheric Measurement, Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkley.Google Scholar
  46. Manabe, S. and Stouffer, R.J.: 1980,J. Geophy. Res. 85, 5529–5554.Google Scholar
  47. Manabe, S. and Wetherald, R.T.: 1987,J. Atm. Sci. 44, 1211–1235.Google Scholar
  48. Melillo, J.M., McGuire, A.D., Kicklighter, D.W., Moore, B., Vorosmarty, C.J. and Schloss, A.L.: 1993, Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production,Nature (in press).Google Scholar
  49. Mitchell, J.F.B.: 1983,Q. J. Roy. Met. Soc. 109, 113–152.Google Scholar
  50. Mooney, H.A., Drake, B.G., Luxmore, R.J., Ochel, W.C. and Pitelka, L.F.: 1991, Bioscience41, 96.Google Scholar
  51. Neilson, R.P.: 1993,Water, Air and Soil Pollution (this volume).Google Scholar
  52. Norby, R.J., Gunderson, C.A., Wallschleger, S.D., O'Neill, E.G. and McCracken, M.K.: 1992,Nature 357, 322.Google Scholar
  53. Oberbauer, S.F., Strain, B.R. and Fetcher, N.: 1985,Physiologia Plantarum 65, 352–356.Google Scholar
  54. Ochel, W.C. and Strain, B.R.: 1985, Native species responses to increased carbon dioxide concentration, in: Strain, B.R. and Cure, J.D. (eds),Direct Effects of Increasing Carbon Dioxide on Vegetation, U.S. DOE NTIS, Springfield, Virginia.Google Scholar
  55. Olson, J. and Watts, J. A.: 1982,Major World Ecosystem Complexes Ranked by Carbon in Live Vegetation, NDP-017, Carbon Dioxide Information Center, Oak Ridge.Google Scholar
  56. Orr, J: 1993,Water, Air and Soil Pollution (this volume).Google Scholar
  57. Parton, W.J., Stewart, J.W.B. and Cole, C.V.: 1988,Biogeochemistry 5:109–131.Google Scholar
  58. Post, W.M., Emanuel, W.R., Zinke, P.J., and Stangenberger, A.G.: 1982,Nature 298, 156–159.Google Scholar
  59. Post, W.M., Chavez, F., Mulholland, P.J., Pastor, J., Peng, T.-H., Prentice, K. and Webb III, T.: 1992, Climatic feedbacks in the global carbon cycle, in: Dunnette, D.A. and O'Brien, R.J. (eds),The Science of Global Change: The Imact of Human Activities on the Environment, American Chemical Society, pp. 392–429.Google Scholar
  60. Prentice, K.C. and Fung, I.Y.: 1990,Nature 346, 48–51.Google Scholar
  61. Prentice, K.C.: 1990, Bioclimatic distribution of vegetation for GCM studies,J. Geophy. Res. (in press).Google Scholar
  62. Prentice, I. C., Cramer, W., Harrison, S. P., Leemans, R., Monserud, R. A. & Solomon, A. M.: 1992,Journal of Biogeography 19, 117–134.Google Scholar
  63. Prentice, I.C. and Sykes, M.T.: 1993, Vegetation geography and global carbon storage changes, in: Woodwell, G.M. (ed),Woods Hole Workshop on Biotic Feedbacks in the Global Climate System, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  64. Prentice, I.C., Monserud, R.A., Smith, T.M. and Emanuel, W.R.: 1992, Modeling large-scalevegetation dynamics, in: Solomon, A.M. and Shugart, H.H. (eds),Vegetation Dynamics and Global Change, Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  65. Prudhomme, T.I., Ochel, W.C., Hastings, S.J. and Lawrence, W.T.: 1984, Net ecosystem gas exchange at ambient and elevated carbon dioxide concentration in tussock tundra at Toolik Lake, Alaska: an evaluation of methods and initial results, in: McBeath, J.H. (ed), The Potential Effects of Carbon Dioxide-Induced Climatic Changes in Alaska: Proceedings of a Conference, School of Agriculture and Land Resources Management, Univ. of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska.Google Scholar
  66. Raich, J.W., Rastetter, E.B., Melillo, J.M., Kicklighter, D.W., Steudler, P.A., Peterson, B.J., Grace, A.L., Moore, B. and Vorosmarty, C.J.: 1991,Ecological Applications 1:399–429.Google Scholar
  67. Rastetter, E.B., Ryan, M.G., Shaver, G.R., Melillo, J.M., Nadelhoffer, K.J., Hobbie, J.E. and Aber, J.D.: 1991,Tree Physiology 9:101–126.Google Scholar
  68. Rotmans, J.: 1990,IMAGE: An integrated Model to Assess the Greenhouse Effect, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  69. Sampson, R.N.: 1993,Water, Air and Soil Pollution (this volume).Google Scholar
  70. Sanchez, P.A. and Bennites, J.R.: 1987,Science 238, 1521–1527.Google Scholar
  71. Schlesinger, M. and Zhao, Z.: 1988,Seasonal climatic changes induced by doubled CO 2 assimulated by the OSU atmospheric GCM/mixed layer ocean model, Oregon St. U.,Corvallis, OR, Climate Research Institute.Google Scholar
  72. Schlessinger, W.H.: 1990,Nature 348, 232–234.Google Scholar
  73. Schroeder, P.S. and Ladd, L.B.: 1991,Climatic Change 19, 283–290.Google Scholar
  74. Sedjo, R.A. and Solomon, A.M.: 1989, Climate and forests, in: Rosenberg, N.J., Easterling, W.E., Crosson, P.R. and Darmstadter, J. (eds.),Greenhouse Warming:Abatement and Adaptation, Resources For The Future, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  75. Shugart, H.H.: 1984,A Theory of Forest Dynamics, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  76. Smith, S.P., Strain, B.R. and Sharkey, T.D.: 1987,Functional Ecology 1, 139–143.Google Scholar
  77. Smith, T.M., Leemans, R. and Shugart, H.H.: 1991a,Climatic Change 21, 367–384.Google Scholar
  78. Smith, T.M., Shugart, H.H., Bonan, G.B., and Smith, J.B.: 1992b,Advances in Ecological Research 22, 93–113.Google Scholar
  79. Smith, T. M. and Shugart, H. H.: 1993a,Nature 361:523–526.Google Scholar
  80. Smith, T. M. and Shugart, H. H.: 1993b,Water, Air and Soil Pollution (this volume).Google Scholar
  81. Solomon, AM. and Shugart, H.H. (eds): 1993,Vegetation Dynamics and Global Change, Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  82. Sundquist, E.T.: 1993, The global carbon dioxide budget,Science 259, 934–941.Google Scholar
  83. Tans, P.P., Fung, I.F. and Takahashi, T.: 1990,Science 247, 1431–1438.Google Scholar
  84. Thornthwaite, C.W.: 1931,Geogr. Rev. 21, 633–655.Google Scholar
  85. Thornthwaite, C.W.: 1933,Geogr. Rev. 23, 433–440.Google Scholar
  86. Thornthwaite, C.W.: 1948,Geogr. Rev. 38, 5–89.Google Scholar
  87. Tissue, D.T. and Oechel, W.C.: 1987,Ecology 68, 401–410.Google Scholar
  88. Troll, C. and Paffen, K.H.: 1964,Erkund. Arch., Wiss Geogr. 18, 5–28.Google Scholar
  89. Vloedbeld, M. and Leemans, R.: 1993,Water, Air and Soil Pollution (this volume).Google Scholar
  90. Washington, W. and Meehl, J.: 1984,J. Geophy. Res. 89, 9475–9503.Google Scholar
  91. Wetherald, R. and Manabe, S.: 1986,Climatic Change 8, 5–23.Google Scholar
  92. Williams, W.E., Garbutt, K., Bazzaz, F.A. and Vousek, P.M.: 1986,Oecologia 69, 454–459.Google Scholar
  93. Winjum, J.K., Dixon, R.K. and Schroeder, P.E.: 1992,Water, Air and Soil Pollution 64, 213–228.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. M. Smith
    • 1
  • W. P. Cramer
    • 2
  • R. K. Dixon
    • 3
  • R. Leemans
    • 4
  • R. P. Neilson
    • 5
  • A. M. Solomon
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Environmental SciencesUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)TelegrafenGermany
  3. 3.Environmental Research LaboratoryU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCorvallisUSA
  4. 4.National Institute for Public Health and Environmental Protection (RIVM)BilthovenThe Netherlands
  5. 5.USDA Forest Service-Pacific Northwest Research StationCorvallisUSA
  6. 6.Environmental Research LaboratoryU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations