Advertisement

Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 81, Issue 3–4, pp 349–361 | Cite as

Evaluation of fly ash as a soil amendment for the Atlantic Coastal Plain: I. Soil hydraulic properties and elemental leaching

  • M. Ghodrati
  • J. T. Sims
  • B. L. Vasilas
Article

Abstract

A major limitation to crop yields in the Atlantic Coastal Plain is drought stress caused by the low moisture-holding capacities of the coarse-textured soils common to the area. Because coal fly ash is comprised primarily of silt and clay-sized particles, it has the potential, if applied at high enough rates, to permanently change soil texture and increase moisture holding capacity. A series of soil column studies were conducted to evaluate the effects of high rates of fly ash on soil hydraulic properties and elemental leaching of trace metals and boron. Fly ash from two Delaware power plants (EM=Edgemoor and IR=Indian River) was incorporated in a Hammonton loamy sand (fine-loamy, siliceous, mesic, Typic Hapludults) at six rates (0, 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40%, by weight). The effect of fly ash on soil moisture holding capacity, hydraulic conductivity, and wetting front velocity was determined. Leachates from columns amended with 30% fly ash were analyzed for B, Cd, Ni, Pb, Cu, and Zn. Soil moisture holding capacity was increased from 12% in the soil alone to 25% in the soil amended with 30% fly ash. Boron and soluble salts leached rapidly from ash amended soils while only trace quantities of Cd, Ni, Pb, Cu, and Zn were detected in column leachates.

Keywords

Boron Soil Moisture Hydraulic Conductivity Drought Stress Soil Column 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adriano, D. C., Page, A. L., Elseewi, A. A., Chang, A. C. and Straughn, I.: 1980,J. Environ. Qual. 7, 333.Google Scholar
  2. Chang, A. C., Lund, L. J., Page, A. L. and Warneke, J. E.: 1977,J. Environ. Qual. 6, 270.Google Scholar
  3. Erickson, A. E., Jacobs, L. W., Sierzega, P. E.: 1987, 26:1-11. Proceedings of Eighth International Ash Ulilization Symposium, American Coal Ash Association, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
  4. Furr, A. K., Kelly, W. C., Bache, C. A., Gutenmann, W. H. and Lisk, D. J.: 1977,Environ. Sci. Technol 11, 1104–112.Google Scholar
  5. Jacobs, L. W., Erickson, A. E., Berti, W. R. and MacKellar, B. M.: 1991, 59:1-16. Proceedings of the Ninth International Ash Utilization Symposium, American Coal Ash Association, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
  6. Keren, R. and Bingham, F. T.: 1985,Adv. Soil Sci. 1, 229–276.Google Scholar
  7. Page, A. L., Elseewi, A. A. and Straugham, I.: 1979,Residue Rev. 71, 83–120.Google Scholar
  8. Ritter, W. F.: 1990, Drain Proc. 1990 Nat'1 Conf. ASAE. New York, pp. 279–287.Google Scholar
  9. Ritter, W. F., Chirnside, A. E. M. and Scarborough, R. W.: 1987, ASAE Paper No. 87-2623. Amer. Soc. Agric. Engin., St. Joseph, MI.Google Scholar
  10. Salter, P. J., Webb, D. S. and Williams, J. B.: 1971,J. Agric. Sci. 77, 56–60.Google Scholar
  11. Sims, J. T.: 1990,J. Eviron. Qual. 19, 669–675.Google Scholar
  12. Sims, J. T. and Heckendorn, S. E.: 1991, Methods of Soil Analysis 2nd Ed., Univ. of Delaware Soil Testing Laboratory. Coop. Bull. No. 10. Univ. of Delaware, Newark, DE.Google Scholar
  13. Sims, J. T., Vasilas, B. L. and Ghodrati, M.: 1995,Water, Air, and Soil Pollut. (in review).Google Scholar
  14. Townsend, W.N. and Hoggson, D. R.: 1973, In: R. J. Hutnik and G. Davis (ed.),Ecology and Reclamation of Devastated Land, Vol. 1, Gordon and Breach, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Ghodrati
    • 1
  • J. T. Sims
    • 1
  • B. L. Vasilas
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant and Soil SciencesUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations